Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
HuaLiu - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Support Engineer at SGM
Real User
Top 5
Automatically apply patches, is stable, and scalable
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to deploy patches to nearly all applications."
  • "SCCM should strive to enhance the accuracy of its reporting functions in order to avoid any issues with incorrect or inaccurate data."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case of the solution is to deploy patches, and applications, and upgrade our client operating systems.

How has it helped my organization?

Without the solution, we would have to manually install all patches and software and upgrade our operating system with the help of our support team, which would take a long time. With SCCM, this process is automated, making it a highly valuable feature.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to deploy patches to nearly all applications.

What needs improvement?

SCCM should strive to enhance the accuracy of its reporting functions in order to avoid any issues with incorrect or inaccurate data.

Microsoft could supply an installation guide to make setup easier.

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Configuration Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable and we have not had any issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable.

We have 100,000 people using the solution.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good. We can call the hotline or use the website to generate the tickets.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward.

What other advice do I have?

I give the solution a nine out of ten.

Maintenance for the solution is easy.

I recommend the solution to others.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1777911 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
Works very well for the endpoints, and you can tune it to do a lot of things
Pros and Cons
  • "It works well for the endpoints for the customer I'm consulting. It has a bunch of knobs, and you can tune it to do lots of things."
  • "I'm looking for a single solution for all discovery needs. It fulfills about 40% of the requirements, and I'd like to see the other 60% so that I don't have to keep doing this."

What is our primary use case?

It is used only for endpoints. We are trying to decide if it is useful for server-based evaluation as well. Like everybody else, we want to track what software is deployed. We have a one-half deployment of this product now, and I'm not sure if it's useful for what we want to do, which is server-based. It is designed to detect any PC. Thousands of people are using it this way, and it's not a new thing, but some people also seem to use the product for server-based detection, and it looks like there are modules you can download for Linux and other things to make it work beyond just the endpoint, which is what I am after.

What is most valuable?

It works well for the endpoints for the customer I'm consulting. It has a bunch of knobs, and you can tune it to do lots of things. 

It is designed to detect any PC. You can do it agent-based, or you can do it by some other method. If it is agent-based, then as long as the PC has the Endpoint Manager agent on it at the time when the batch job runs, it detects the hardware and software and puts it in the database. 

What needs improvement?

I'm looking for a single solution for all discovery needs. It fulfills about 40% of the requirements, and I'd like to see the other 60% so that I don't have to keep doing this.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been consulting in this space for five years. It has been used by the customer for years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I don't have enough data on that. While I've been observing it, it has been stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

When you buy it, you license it with a total number of devices to be managed, and that's a wall. When you hit the wall, you're going to need more licenses. So, you can scale right up to the spot where you have hit your boundary on licensing. To that boundary, it scales just fine.

How are customer service and support?

I don't have any experience with their support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

This client uses seven or eight different things to perform this function of discovery. They use two different things for networks, and they use a hodgepodge of things to track VMware and Virtual Data Images (VDIs) and basically back of the envelope to track things that are on servers.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

As far as I know, it is an annual operating expense license.

What other advice do I have?

You may need complementary products to handle the holes not envisioned by SCCM.

For what it was designed to do, I would rate it a nine out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Configuration Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1539666 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Technical Support Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Helpful reporting tool, scalable, and offers valuable organization viability
Pros and Cons
  • "I have found the solution to be scalable. We have around 50,000 users using the solution."
  • "I currently need to increase my compliance level in the patching processes which this solution could improve on."

What is our primary use case?

This solution helps to manage different areas. For example, asset inventory and software inventory. You are able to patch products, do software deployment, and software packaging. 

What is most valuable?

I have found some valuable features to be the built-in reporting tool, the ability to get visibility on your organization, compliance reports, software remitting for all your products in your organization, and the management of all machines in your environment including a new domain and workgroups.

What needs improvement?

I currently need to increase my compliance level in the patching processes which this solution could improve on. For this purpose, I am looking for another solution to perform more efficiently and to work faster to cover this part specifically.

There should be more visibility to integrate more products other than Microsoft products. For example, Adobe and Google Chrome. You need to do a lot of manual intervention to cover all non-Microsoft products for patching at the moment. There are third parties working on these gaps in this solution. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for 12 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable most of the time.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have found the solution to be scalable. We have around 50,000 users using the solution.

How are customer service and technical support?

We were satisfied with the support sometimes. There were occasions when we have had an engineer that was not experienced in the particular problem we encountered to be able to help efficiently. This could be improved by having better-trained engineers.

How was the initial setup?

The specifications for the SCCM and the organizational capacity can make the installation complex otherwise it can be easy.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment took a long time. We required a team system engineer from Microsoft to be allocated with my team to complete any configuration.

What other advice do I have?

We are currently looking for another solution to work in parallel to cover some of the gaps in functionality.

I rate SCCM an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Network Engineer & System Administrator at Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics
Real User
Top 20
Provides software and hardware inventories and helps users to monitor the assets in the organization
Pros and Cons
  • "The dashboards have information about our assets."
  • "The solution is crowded with information."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution to monitor our servers and clouds. We also use it for software and hardware inventories.

What is most valuable?

Hardware and software inventories help us discover the resources and assets in our organization. The dashboards have information about our assets. We use the reports for decision-making. The tool gives good information about our resources in the organization.

What needs improvement?

The solution is crowded with information. It is complicated to search for things.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for almost six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is excellent. I have had no problems. I rate the product’s stability an eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have around ten users in the organization. The product serves only the environment where we install the agent for each client. We have almost 2000 clients. I rate the product’s scalability a nine out of ten.

How was the initial setup?

The implementation is easy. It took three to four hours.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Since we are a government organization, money is not an issue. There's an agreement between the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology and Microsoft.

What other advice do I have?

I will recommend the tool to others. It is helpful for organizations. Overall, I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Abul Fazal - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at Almoayyed Computers
Real User
Top 10
Easy to implement with good patching and has lots of new features in the pipeline
Pros and Cons
  • "Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace."
  • "We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for client management, especially for day-to-day operational activities, like access management or software deployment.

What is most valuable?

The main key feature that we find the most valuable is the patching. The remote desktop is a very useful feature as well. The software deployment aspect is helpful too. These are the three core features from which we see the customers really benefit if they have a System Center Config Manager. This is especially true for enterprise organizations here.

Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace. 

What needs improvement?

We are okay with all the available features.

In the future, we're looking for tighter integration with cloud solutions like Windows Intune. It is already there, however, it's still in need of some improvements. It's not straightforward in terms of the administration on offer. 

We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users.

It offers a very difficult cloud gateway when it comes to cloud management.

The solution does need a lot of configuration and fine-tuning, so a company will need a dedicated person who's knowledgeable in the product to manage it.

A few people complained that SCCM is very complex without CPS, depending on the SQL database, and when using SQL as a backend service. Sometimes updating the dashboard and getting the reports, can be slow. They're not getting an instant update on the database. That is where most of the customers tend to complain. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution since version 2.0 or something close to that. It may be at least 15 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We don't have very many issues in SCCM. It's not a plug and play software, however. From time to time it does require fine-tuning. You need the right management and administrative people in place to manage the product. This is essential in order to keep it running correctly.  

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have clients in both the private and public sectors. 

The solution requires fine-tuning and configuration tweaks. In order to scale it, you will need a knowledgeable person to manage the process.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support from Microsoft has been good. We've been satisfied with their level of service.

How was the initial setup?

We don't find the initial setup to be complex. We've done many implementations a this point, and we find it to be straightforward. Our team is very much experts at this point. They know all the processes and they go through everything step by step. 

In terms of how long it takes to deploy the solution, this question is very tricky. It's all dependant on the customers, and their environment as well as the customer's readiness to proceed. If it's a POC, where I don't have any dependencies on the customer side, that everything will be within the private network, isolated environment, I can handle a deployment within two days. We can install, configure, and make everything ready in that short amount of time simply because we don't have customer dependencies.

You do need to have the correct people in place to manage it once it's up and running. They need to be experienced and dedicated to the product.

What about the implementation team?

We're an integrator and service provider here in Bahrain, so we have done more than a couple of installations, so where our team is very confident in our ability to implement the solution on behalf of our clients.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We're actually looking at ServiceNow as a potential product to use in the future.

What other advice do I have?

We are a Microsoft gold partner.

We're noticing many users in our country moving away from Microsoft and towards AWS.

We tend to use the latest solution, or something close to that. We always are trying to keep it up to date in all the customer database and systems. Whenever there is the latest update available, we update everything immediately for our customers. The latest version may be 19.06.

While all the customers we have are currently on-prem, we are looking for cloud-based solutions going forward, due to the fact that our customers tend to gravitate towards the cloud. They are like looking for something they can easily manage. That's all clients, irrespective of whether they are in the office or are our mobile users. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I really like the product, however, there's always room for improvement.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
AlfonsoNaranjo - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technology Consultant at SoftwareONE
Vendor
Top 5
Offers access to different tools in a single solution
Pros and Cons
  • "Microsoft Configuration Manager gives different tools in one solution."
  • "The tool's deployment is complex and depends on the architecture you want to implement."

What is most valuable?

Microsoft Configuration Manager gives different tools in one solution. 

What needs improvement?

The tool's deployment is complex and depends on the architecture you want to implement. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The tool is scalable. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate Microsoft Configuration Manager a ten out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1798314 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Stable, good online support, and integrates well with Microsoft solutions
Pros and Cons
  • "Microsoft has done a good job with authentication solutions, such as single sign-on, or open authentication."
  • "The downside of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's an on-premise-based solution. With the pandemic coming on board the need to support users across the globe has increased. For a while, we would use the in-built Microsoft Teams screen sharing feature but the disadvantage of that is you cannot perform privileged access. Microsoft does not give you access to that. That's where you need cloud-based tools, such as BeyondTrust or Freshservice."

What is most valuable?

Microsoft has done a good job with authentication solutions, such as single sign-on, or open authentication.

What needs improvement?

The downside of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's an on-premise-based solution. With the pandemic coming on board the need to support users across the globe has increased. For a while, we would use the in-built Microsoft Teams screen sharing feature but the disadvantage of that is you cannot perform privileged access. Microsoft does not give you access to that. That's where you need cloud-based tools, such as BeyondTrust or Freshservice.

There are many aspects of this solution that can be improved, such as security.

The integration could be better with other software packages.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager for approximately three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Having Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager available only on on-premise creates limitations. If you want the best scalability options then you will have to move to the cloud to a solution such as Microsoft Intune.

We have approximately 1,000 active endpoints using this solution.

How are customer service and support?

Microsoft has a lot of support available for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager. When we open a support ticket Microsoft solves them in the set out the time frame in the SLA.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using other solutions previously.

How was the initial setup?

The installation is not easy. As with most on-premise solutions, they are not easy to install. Microsoft documentation is complicated and goes on and on. It's a lot to try to assimilate the information. With a cloud solution, it makes it a bit easier. However, even with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager being on-premise with Intune, it's still not straightforward. The time the implementation took for us to complete was a couple of weeks with a five-person team.

In recent times, a lot of companies have begun to move away from Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager. The endpoint configuration is very convoluted to implement. In most companies, you need to have a very large dedicated team to manage the solution on the back end. 

A lot of companies are looking to cost savings. With the advent of cloud solutions, companies have the opportunity to receive a lot of cost savings. There are a lot of ITSM tools that will do asset management for you, change management, converged asset management, and updates. There are other ways to configure updates and deployment. The solution is a bit convoluted and expensive.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is expensive.

I have a very good idea of what my present workplace pays for this solution because it's usually a mixture of different solutions. For example, if you have an Azure P2 license, it tends to cover Microsoft 365 E5. We have a number of licenses. 

The licensing is typically paid monthly or annually as part of the agreement by the customer.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others if you're an Azure-centric organization. If you have your workloads on Azure and are a Microsoft-based organization. For example, you have Microsoft servers, Microsoft endpoints, Azure workloads, BD VMs, Data Factory, and SQL.

I would advise others to use online help forums instead of Microsoft documentation because they can tend to be complicated and lengthy.

I rate Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1054521 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Systems Engineer at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Great patch management, extremely responsive technical support, and very efficient
Pros and Cons
  • "We have found the scalability to be quite good."
  • "In terms of the monitoring, the timeframe it takes to actually report back on the compliance of a device after it has been patched is a bit too long."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for patch management, application deployment and operating system deployment.

How has it helped my organization?

It has improved our ability to remediate against critical CVE's in a timely manner across the enterprise.

What is most valuable?

The patch management is great. The ability to be able to centrally purchase servers is quite useful.

The ability to monitor only after you have rebooted devices allows you to see if they have compliance or not.

The efficiency - as opposed to patching once you have the time - of having a central repository to manage everything you need is very helpful.

The solution is quite stable. 

It's perfect for enterprises.

We have found the scalability to be quite good.

What needs improvement?

In terms of the monitoring, the timeframe it takes to actually report back on the compliance of a device after it has been patched is a bit too long. That could be better. Sometimes you could be looking at a screen and may take about five to 10 minutes before you get back the actual compliance status and that could be reduced.

Having a cloud solution is better in a lot of ways. For the deployment of the operating system, with InTune and modern end-point management, you no longer have to image machines and waste a lot of hours. You no longer have your technicians spending four, five hours imaging machine sessions for drivers and things like that. You can make use of an autopilot, which reduces resources and can cut down the timeframe drastically. There's a lot of wins with the cloud technology that's coming forward, that enterprises and organizations can make use of.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution over the three years. It's been in our organization for the past six years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a very stable product. It is definitely an enterprise-grade patch management solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is very scalable. When we have migrations and we bring on additional devices, such as during an acquisition of companies, it's great. We can bring them right into our environment. It's very scalable in terms of deploying and adding a new division to the solution. 

Currently, we have it deployed to support over 20,000 PCs.

Likely, we will increase usage. There are also new tools that are modern tools that we are starting to make use of. As much as you're doing something for patch management, where you need to enter the discussion is you need to start looking at modern endpoints, which is InTune, for example. We will start making use of InTune for the patch of end-points. We could also do scheduling of those patches as well from the cloud to the client. We are using, a hybrid approach. Generally, our goal is to expand usage.

How are customer service and support?

In terms of technical support, once you have a Microsoft agreement, the level of support would be the same across all our products. We have an enterprise-grade level of support. Therefore, once I create a critical case, I get support within the hour. We are quite satisfied.

How was the initial setup?

We have had a deployment in our enterprise for more than five years. It's a relatively complex deployment due to the fact that we have a large organization.

I am one of the enterprise engineers. I make deployments happen at a new location and it may just be a matter of training the onsite technician at that new division on how to make use of it. We have an enterprise-grade deployment and we have divisional deployments where divisions can make use of it to still manage their in-house shops.

What about the implementation team?

A consultant would've assisted in the initial deployment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We do pay a licensing fee on a yearly basis. 

There is a license cost and it is licensed per deployment. We do pay licensing costs for all of the deployments that we have on our end, across the enterprise.

With the way everything is moving to the cloud, you need to have all of these licenses in place.

What other advice do I have?

We're partners with Microsoft.

For people looking into implementing Configuration Manager at this point, I would recommend it. They should also look at InTune, which is more of an endpoint deployment. For the servers, you can still look at what we have, however, just the way, how things are developing, I can see the industry and patch management moving away from on-prem management to more like making use of the cloud and use of our Microsoft for business in terms of managing the updates, ease of updates and things like that. What is happening now is a paradigm shift.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. It's great for enterprises.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Configuration Manager Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Configuration Manager Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.