Microsoft Intune Reviews

The solution affords data protection on mobile device management. It also provides functionality for data protection on one's laptop and desktop. But, this requires a different ecosystem for the provision of full data protection. A person can utilize this if he has a cloud proxy and something in his infrastructure.

MM and MDM are two useful features that we employ.

It would be great to see on-premises mailboxes and for the solution to have geofencing capabilities.

As it is a next generation product, the patching abilities should also be addressed. 

We have been using Microsoft Intune for the last three or four years.

As the solution is a software as a service, the scalability is unlimited. 

We are satisfied with the partner and community support of Microsoft.

The initial setup can be a bit complex, although this ultimately depends on the requirements of the business. If a proper framework is established then the solution is simpler to deploy. 

Moreover, the company culture impacts the complexity of the deployment. There are times when we must provide guides or that user training is required. When deploying in the developer community, in which the participants are tech savvy, the process will be easier. Conversely, when doing so in a non-developer community, this process can take awhile. 

The licensing costs we leave up to the customer and these vary from one to another. This is because it depends on whether or not the customer will opt for an open license enterprise agreement. 

The solution is solely cloud-based.

We work with medium and enterprise businesses.

I rate Microsoft Intune as an eight out of ten.

I am using Intune to manage both mobile devices and PC devices. I deploy applications and manage the security landscape.

The most valuable feature for us is the security, including risk analysis and patch management. The management is very important for us.

The configuration could be better by consolidating options and making it simpler. I would like to have one option in one place that corresponds to one feature, which I can check off and move onto the next one. As it is now, there are a lot of options. For example, when configuring security, I find that it is too much because you have to configure one task in one place, then switch and it is against in another place, and so forth.

In the future, I would like to see support for security and compliance management. I would also like to see iOS management options.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for five years.

This is a stable product.

Being a cloud-based solution, it is very easy to scale.

We have approximately 30,000 users.

I have contacted the Microsoft technical support lots of times. It is okay and I am satisfied with it.

We did not use a different solution for the same purpose before implementing Intune.

The initial setup was simple and it took us about two days to deploy it.

Intune only supports mobile devices in the cloud version. Because a number of my clients have both PCs and mobile devices, I deployed it in a hybrid model.

I am responsible for configuration and deployment, and sometimes maintenance. Our help desk also handles the maintenance.

The price of Intune is often included as part of a bundle with other Microsoft licenses, which makes it somewhat cheaper.

Microsoft Intune is cost-effective and easy to use, so I can recommend it. That said, it is not perfect, so I think that they can improve a lot of things.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We are using this product for enterprise development within our organization.

The primary use is for building Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) capabilities.

The most valuable feature is the UEM capabilities.

The user interface should be improved because it is a little bit slow.

It does not have support for containerization.

There is no catalog for mobile access management (MAM) security.

I have been working with Microsoft Intune for more than six or seven years.

Because we are doing a PoC, there have been no issues with scalability as of now.

We started with a user base of 5,000 and are aiming to have 30,000.

Because we are still in the PoC, we are only testing it with a few users.

We have not been in touch with Microsoft technical support.

The configuration is straightforward and there is nothing complex about it.

Intune is a good product for UEM, which is helpful for Windows 10 management. However, for MAM, there is lots of improvement needed. For example, the application catalog should be there.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

We use this for management of all mobile devices.

We would like to see support for Chrome and/or devices for Chromebooks.

I have been using this solution for about three years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. We currently have tens of thousands of users within our organization using the solution.

I think customer support is quite good, we have enterprise support and premier support agreements.

Initial setup was straightforward.

Potential users should run a proof of concept. This can be done easily because Microsoft is offering a free trial period of one month.

I would rate this an eight out of ten.

We use Microsoft Intune to secure our mobile access when you're assessing your data from your mobile. Additionally, we use the solution to limit people from transferring files to people that are not part of our domain, and secure company data from exposure.

The one feature we find most useful is the Mobile Application Manager. There are two types, we have the complete MDM and the Mobile Application Manager(MAM). We don't give our users phones, it is their own personal phone, and we need to allow them to have access to the company detail on their phone. We need to create a balance between their own personal data and the company data. We deploy the  Mobile Application Manager for them so that we won't be able to interfere with their own personal data.

We are always working with Microsoft on improvements. Improvement is not something that is static, we are always looking for a dynamic way of working with Microsoft. We have a support and enterprise agreement with Microsoft. Every quarter, we review the performance of all our solutions and then we ask for further improvement.

In the next release, I would like a feature to be able to properly lock down the device. For example, if an attacker or somebody steals the phone, you can be sure that the pin cannot be broken.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for approximately four years.

I have found Microsoft Intune to be stable.

Microsoft Intune is scalable.

The installation is not complex.

I would advise others to ensure that the technical people are well versatile and trained, especially the technical people that will implement Microsoft Intune.

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.

We use this primarily for security on our devices. We use this product because it came with the bundle from Microsoft.

By using Microsoft Intune, I can control my Outlook on my phone. Whenever I try to open any file attatchment, it will be more secure. There are additional security precautions it provides with photos, as well. 

The security features are valuable to us. We have a BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) policy at our organization. Many employees need help managing these devices. Microsoft Intune helps us manage MDM (Mobile Device Management).  We find it provides MAM (Mobile Application Management) to a lesser degree.

The MAM feature could be improved. In addition, the security of photo sharing could be improved. 

It is very scalable. Our organization has over 26,000 employees. 

Microsoft Intune is a cost effective choice.  It is less expensive than other products on the market. 

We also looked at VMware AirWatch. 

We have several different use cases. We have a BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) policy for corporate owned devices, and managing those devices is our responsibility.

It is a very helpful and easy solution. When deploying different configuration policies and compliance policies it is helpful. In addition, deployment of applications on devices is a valuable feature.

I think that there is room for improvement with the reporting. If this is done, it will be a better product.

I have not encountered any issues with stability of this product.

It is quite scalable. It is quite easily able to extend the capabilities of whatever you want to do. And, it is not always visible to the end customer.

I have used technical support in the past. When considering the seniority level of the tech support, I think they are quite good in comparison to other products. They are quick to respond to our needs.

We previously used VMware Airwatch.

The purchase of the product was handled by someone else in our company. I do not have experience with pricing of the product.

We received Intune with a bundle of Microsoft products.

The use case for this solution varies depending on the user's requirement. Some are only interested in MDM, while others are interested in managing Windows plus Mac. It really depends. We are partners and provide on-prem, cloud and hybrid services to our customers. I'm tech lead infrastructure operations. 

Lately I've been working on the Remote Wipe and Autopilot. Autopilot is one of the best features because we can use it during remote migration. It especially helps in this pandemic situation where we don't need any end-user computing engineer support. If someone wants to remix a machine, we can initiate it remotely.

An improvement would be if we were able to leverage more iOS device management internally. My goal is to manage all the tools in one centralized tool. Intune does 30 percent of Mac management, but if it could have complete management including patching and automating for Mac devices, that would be good.

I've been using this solution for three years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

I have been trying to contact technical support but haven't been able to reach anyone. I have a couple of questions to which I haven't been able to get any answers. 

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

The cost is fair but it would be helpful if they would segregate the licenses. There are a lot of features that many of our customers don't need but have to pay for because it comes as a bundle package and we're unable to exclude anything that is not necessary.  

I also work with Jamf Pro but you can't compare the two because Jamf Pro doesn't have real-time features and it doesn't do most of the things that Intune does. 

If a customer is looking for a macOS solution, I would for sure recommend Jamf Pro. If it is for Windows and macOS in a combined environment, then I would recommend Intune for managing it. The consideration is based on the customer's macOS family, based on how many users they have. If they have 100 users, then we can still manage it through Intune. If it's a complex environment, for sure we'd need Jamf Pro.

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.