Microsoft Teams Reviews

We use Microsoft Teams for meetings, calling, and chatting.

Arranging online meetings is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams.

The solution’s stability could be improved.

Microsoft Teams should provide integration with Microsoft Office 365 tools.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for about one year.

I rate Microsoft Teams a five or six out of ten for stability.

I rate Microsoft Teams a seven or eight out of ten for scalability. Around 200 users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization.

I rate Microsoft Teams a five or six out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

The deployment of Microsoft Teams takes a couple of minutes.

Microsoft Teams is deployed on-cloud in our organization.

Microsoft Teams is quite convenient to use, and it's integrated with other Microsoft software.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten.

We primarily use it for meetings and office communication. Also for creating groups, channels, and virtual environments.

One valuable feature is the ability to edit a message that you've posted so you don't have to repeat yourself. 

Another feature I enjoy is the integration with the task planner in Outlook and Teams, which allows me to manage tasks across platforms.

There are some issues with stability. The stability could be improved. 

Moreover, the pricing could be made more affordable for users with different licenses.

We use the cloud-based version, Office 365.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. Sometimes it doesn't work well.

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

Setting up Teams was not difficult.

The standalone license is not cheap. The pricing could be made more affordable for users with different licenses. 

I would recommend giving it a shot. Overall, I would rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten. 

In my company, we use Microsoft Teams for one-to-one interaction with team members or to schedule meetings. One can also have stand-up calls or have meeting rooms in Microsoft Teams.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is its UI.

There are a lot of frequent updates, which is a shortcoming of the tool. For improvement, there should be a lesser amount of frequent updates in Microsoft Teams.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for three years. I don't remember the version of the solution.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

I don't remember the name of the solution I used in the past.

The initial setup of Microsoft Teams is straightforward since you just need to install it from Microsoft's website.

The solution's deployment can be done in three to four minutes.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

The installation phase of Microsoft Teams can be done in-house.

I would recommend the solution to those planning to use it.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We use Teams for meetings because it comes with features for collaboration and document management.

The tool makes it easy for us to book meetings. It seamlessly integrates with the Office application which we are using for the last four years. 

The solution needs to be more stable. I have found Zoom to be more stable than Teams. 

My company has six users for Teams. 

Microsoft's support is good enough for me. 

Positive

I use Zoom but find it to be less competitive than Teams. Zoom does not offer integration with documents, calendars, etc. 

Teams' setup is easy and takes less than a day to complete. There isn't much configuration involved since everything is on the cloud. The solution's deployment is not a rocket science. 

The solution's pricing is fair enough and not expensive. Teams' licensing costs are yearly. However, Zoom is less expensive. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. You will get the full benefits of the solution if you use collaboration and document management. 

We run most projects in Teams. We use it for file sharing with customers and internally. We also use To Do on Teams to follow up.

File sharing is the most valuable feature. It is so simple to send a file in chat or a team’s site. It is very useful.

To Do tasks’ ease of use should be improved. It should be simplified. The product should also enable users to mention people on tasks.

I have been using the solution for probably two years.

The solution is stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The product pulls some computing power. More than 40 consultants, developers, and customers use the solution in our organization.

Setting up a Teams site and a project in Teams is straightforward and easy. The solution is deployed on the cloud in our organization.

If someone wants to use the product, they could look at the add-ons provided by it. It has quite a few add-ons. Overall, I rate the product an eight or nine out of ten.

We use the solution for recording meetings and preparing education for our YouTube channel.

It's a very flexible program.

We can do screen sharing very easily.

It's good for recording sessions. 

Sometimes, I can't see if a person came into the meeting; however, when I go and look at the session at the end, I can see who has come and gone from the meeting.

The transcription feature is great. I can copy it and create a document out of it. 

It's quite stable and issue-free.

The solution can scale. 

The room feature could be better. I like the visibility we get when we use Zoom, for example. I'd like the rooms to be set up more like that. I'd like more room management features. 

I'd like Microsoft to start adding more AI functionality into Teams.

I use Teams all of the time for work. I've used it for about two years at this point.

I've never had any issues with stability. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash.

The solution scales well. It's easy to implement new users.

We all use Teams in my company. We have about 80 people using it. 

I've never had any issues with the product. I've never had to reach out to technical support.

I have used Zoom in the past for virtual meetings. I only use it occasionally. I have noted some stability issues with it that I haven't noted in Teams. I don't have a license for Zoom. I haven't seen the backend administration features.

I did not handle the setup process. It was automatically deployed to my laptop. 

We do not have to do any maintenance tasks. However, we do have an administrator. He may have maintenance tasks. 

We have an Office 365 license which includes Teams in the product. I'm not sure of the exact cost of the solution. 

I'm an end-user.

I'm not sure which version we're using. 

We save our meetings in the cloud when we use the solution. 

I would recommend the solution to others. I know that Microsoft has begun to add AI to its products. However, this hasn't happened in Teams just yet. Once they start adding AI, it will become even better - and it's already very good.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I am a freelancer. The decision on what solution to use is determined by my customers. Some of my customers have over 5,000 employees who are using Teams.

Teams is a virtual meeting solution. We use Teams to work with our clients purely with video conferences.

This is a stable solution, I have not faced any problems using the video conferencing.

As an app installed, Microsoft Teams is resource-consuming. When using it from their browser-based application, I experienced login problems.

For future releases, I would like to see Microsoft Teams make a lighter application and drop some features.

Microsoft Teams has all the features it needs, however, I noticed on some laptops that the features are not available. For example, if you want to change your virtual background, not all laptops have the hardware configured to link with that feature. The solution should make all features available irrespective of hardware configuration.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for two years.

This is a stable solution, I have not faced any problems using the video conferencing.

Microsoft is always scalable, it depends on the level of licensing an organization has purchased.

The initial setup of Microsoft Teams is easy. I would rate setup a 5 out of 5 as the solution is straightforward.

I have had concerns with login and resource consumption using Microsoft Teams, I would consider Zoom or Cisco WebEx as better solutions.

Organizations should consider what features they want to utilize. If they want all features to be available, they need to have an enterprise category system. Logging in from a home segment device will not have all features available. 

I would rate the solution an 8 out of 10.

We use Microsoft Teams to communicate with colleagues via scheduling meetings and calls.

Microsoft Teams could log in faster.

We have 100 Microsoft Teams users in our organization.

I use Zoom and Google Meet as well.

The initial setup process is straightforward for technical executives.

I rate Microsoft Teams a ten out of ten.