Microsoft Teams Reviews

We use Microsoft Teams for any work-related activities.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that it is integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem.

Because it's cloud-based, sometimes Microsoft Teams will have outages. The solution's customer support should be faster and more responsive.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for four years.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten for stability.

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. Around 50 users are using the solution in our organization. I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for scalability.

The solution's initial setup is easy.

Microsoft Teams takes only a few minutes to deploy, and just one person can download and install the solution. The solution does not require any maintenance.

Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution. I rate Microsoft Teams a five out of ten for pricing. The product has a monthly license, and there are no extra costs besides the license fee.

I recommend other users to use Microsoft Teams as it is a really good software from Microsoft.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten.

I use Teams for meetings, chats, and outgoing calls.

Teams' most valuable feature is the ability to choose from multiple numbers to show when calling.

Teams doesn't always sync to show as Do Not Disturb during Outlook meetings. In the next release, it would be useful to see other users' availability.

I've been using Teams for a year and a half.

Teams is stable, though there are very occasional problems with flashing when screen sharing.

We previously used Skype, but Teams is more user-friendly and syncs with Outlook.

The initial setup was challenging because Teams was a new platform for us, but it was that hard, and the training provided helped us understand better. Deployment took three months.

Teams is really user-friendly and not that complex. I would give it a rating of nine out of ten.

• Collaboration
• Meetings
• Voice, video calls, and chats

It has allowed for collaboration during the COVID-19 situation (work from home).

• Calling
• Setting up teams
• Meetings
• File transfer

Whiteboard should be standard rather than an app.

Six months.

We use the solution for communication purposes such as video calls. 

The solution is easy to use and helps me to communicate with my students. 

The solution's stability can be better. 

I have been using the product for a year. 

I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. 

I have about 100 students and there are no issues with the tool's scalability. 

I use the solution's web version and there is no problem in setting it up. 

I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good for meetings and team collaboration. 

We use the solution for business communication with our clients and other companies. 

The tool is simple to use. 

The only issue is that inside the Outlook link, you sometimes do work. So it has to be opened outside Windows.

I have been working with the solution for two to three years. 

The product is stable and would rate it a nine out of ten. 

The solution is scalable and we have five users for the product. 

I have used Zoom and Google Meet before. We switched to the product since we are using the MS suite. 

The tool's setup is easy and we use the desktop version. The tool's deployment gets completed in a few minutes. 

The tool's price is part of MS Office 365 and I would rate its pricing five out of ten. The tool's licensing costs are monthly. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

We use the solution for corporate calls and meetings. 

It is simple to schedule meetings in Teams. There are also plugins available from the Microsoft store that can be integrated with the solution. You can edit documents in the tool itself. 

Sometimes, other participants cannot see the shared screen during meetings. The tool also needs to automatically switch to devices as we change them. When I try to switch audio from speaker to Bluetooth, I have to manually do that. 

I have been using the solution for a while. 

The solution's scalability is great and I would rate it a ten out of ten. 

The product's setup is easy. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

We use Microsoft Teams for group communications.

The solution’s pricing could be improved.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for more than three years.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten for stability.

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for scalability.

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for its ease of initial setup.

The solution's deployment is done by minimal staff in 30 to 45 minutes.

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for its pricing.

We are using the latest version of Microsoft Teams. The solution is deployed on the cloud in our organization.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten.

Our company is small, with only six people. I work out of my home, and one of my colleagues does as well. The two of us used this solution for instant messaging and bits and pieces like that. We didn't actually use the full service because we're not a big company. We don't have an instant messaging infrastructure, so we use Teams instead. My other colleagues did not use it because they are mobile and do not sit at a desk during the day.

We stopped using it because my coworker is on maternity leave and will be off for another year. However, when she returns, we will probably go back to using Teams.

Microsoft Teams gave our small group the ability to chat via instant messenger.

The most valuable feature for us was instant messaging. I did like the fact that you could start various teams so that if you wanted to instant message certain individuals, you could have the group chats going on in the background. But again, we were such a small company, we didn't actually use it. I think if it was a large company, fantastic because you've got large multiple groups feeding in. For a small company, no.

I liked the idea of being able to share, but we used Dropbox, so we found that we didn't need to share documents. It would have provided another layer, but our team is not large enough to warrant a group of individuals, multiple locations, all feeding into one document at different times. We didn't actually have a need for that.

I didn't know that Teams is part of Office 365, so I think that it should be better advertised with its features and capabilities. It would be helpful for it to be more visible and what the benefits of it are. Documentation on its capabilities and guidelines on its use would also be helpful.

This solution would be improved with more functionality built into the interface. If you compare Teams to Lync, Lync is just a little box in the corner and it pops up and alerts you if someone is trying to contact you. With teams, you have to physically go in and look to see what is going on. The interface could be improved so that we don't have to manually check for things such as who is online.

I used Microsoft Teams for about four months, but I no longer use it.

This is a stable solution.

There were only two of us in the company who were using this solution. As such, we never need to scale it.

In this company, we did not use another solution prior to Teams. This was a quick and easy solution for instant messaging that was part of Office 365.

In my previous company, which was larger, there was an instant messenger called Lync that we used constantly.

Once I knew to look for it, I searched for it and started it. The deployment took a couple of seconds.

I set it up on my own.

As an instant messenger, Teams is not as good as Lync. However, it was built into Office 365 so we used it. We were only using it as an instant messenger, essentially trying to fill a hole rather than use it to its full capacity, 

My advice for anybody researching this solution is to look on YouTube to get an idea of what it can do, and use it to its fullest capacity. That is what I did because it wasn't really clear what we could do with the product or how I could use it.

I would rate this solution a five out of ten.