Microsoft Teams Reviews

We use Microsoft Teams for internal calls and customer-facing calls.

The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are the calendar integration and the integration of chat and chat history into events. The integration of chat and chat history into events that I don't attend is useful because it allows me to find the dialogue in a call easily. It also allows me to go back and view recording videos.

Microsoft Teams should include better integration of the multi-viewer webinar-type system.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for probably three years now.

Microsoft Teams is a stable solution. I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for stability.

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for scalability. Around 1,000 users are using Microsoft Teams in our company.

We previously used Webex and Zoom. We switched to Microsoft Teams exclusively since it is included in the Microsoft package and subscription and has improved features.

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution because it's included in the Microsoft 365 suite.

We are using the latest version of Microsoft Teams. I recommend Microsoft Teams to other users.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for all the meetings that we used to have on premise. In the current situation, Teams is a good alternative. We are customers of Microsoft and I am chief specialist of MMS. 

I think the screen sharing feature is the most valuable. 

I think it would be helpful if the whiteboard tool was embedded in the solution rather than having to deploy or download a tool for this. I also don't like it that the toolbar sticks to the screen during meetings. There should be an option to remove or at lease minimize it as it obstructs the view. 

We've been using this solution for four months. 

Stability is very good, we've had minimal crashed. In fact, the internet infrastructure that we have is also good, so I haven't had any problems.

I have also used Zoom which I think is more popular than Teams in terms of being able to include more people and ease of use in video conferencing. Nevertheless, I think both are good tools.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward even if you're not an IT person. It's just a matter of downloading the application and it will be set up on your desktop. There are probably close to 500 users in our company that use it regularly. 

I'm a business user so I'm not talking from an IT perspective but I believe there has been a return on investment because Teams has seamlessly allowed us to continue to do our work over the lockdown period. I can't put a value on that but it has benefited the company.

There is some room for improvement, so I would rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

Our company is moving from their Skype for Business to Teams. So I've seen it, I've looked at it, I've used it somewhat enjoyed the UI. Teams has been very friendly. I have no qualms about going to Teams from Skype. I have yet a lot to discover.

There's one thing that I was disappointed in when I was trying to invite my whole team to a meeting. I had to type the team members versus being able to set up a team's group of names as you can do with Outlook. It would be nice if you could take the ones that dial in with their phone numbers and it had some type of translation. The idea is to get the name of the person dialing in. I don't know if they can get tricky and pick up a name that's associated with that number or prompt the user as they do on Skype.

I'm a new user of Microsoft Teams, I've only used it for a week.

I haven't encountered any stability problems at this point

I would rate Microsoft Team on an even par with Skype for Business. I would give it an 8 on a scale from one to10.

I use the Teams for internal communication like to reach my colleague and share information. 

I like the video call and document-sharing features. 

The solution needs to be integrated with Microsoft Planner. I have also faced issues with stability in the first month. 

I have been using the product for five to six months. 

The product is stable most of the time and I would rate it around six to seven out of ten. 

The solution is very scalable and my company has 400 users for the product. 

The product's support is good. 

Positive

Teams' setup is easy and I would rate it around eight to nine out of ten. 

I use Teams' free version. 

I would rate the product a seven out of ten. Teams works very well for a medium to big company. I don't think the tool is the best when you are the only person and want to reach anybody. 

We mainly use Teams for meetings and video chatting.

In general, Teams allows me to connect with anyone in the organization and share files with the team.

The call quality could be better sometimes. Microsoft could improve the quality of the backgrounds. File sharing could also be smoother. It takes a lot of clicks to download and copy the links. It should be only one click. 

It's also problematic to get people outside the organization into the chat or groups. I can define my own team irrespective of the organizational structure. Still, if I need to work with external partners or colleagues at my company and want them on one team, it's relatively complicated to add external people to the team.

I've been using Teams for about four years. 

I can't say that Teams isn't stable. The only issue we have is the call quality. Sometimes it blurs, or the video stops. However, that could be a connectivity issue that isn't directly connected to the tool. 

I rate Microsoft Teams eight out of 10. 

Our use case is mostly for screen sharing and video conferences. I'm a solutions architect/systems engineer and we're a customer of Microsoft. 

The video conferencing would be the best feature. One of the main reasons for moving to this solution is that it's included with our Office365 subscription. As a company we were already paying to use it. 

I would like to be able to see a larger number of participants in the gallery view, that would improve the product. I think the ability to integrate with other team's scheduling, for example, with people outside the organization would be a good feature. For example, most of our business partners work for Dell and EMC and they also use Teams. It would be great if we could pop on a video conference with them where screens were shared and we could at least see information on each other's calendars or some sort of external scheduling feature.

I've been using Teams for the last seven months. 

It's a stable solution. 

The scalability is pretty good, our entire company uses it and we're about 60 people which includes engineers, sales, administrative, accounting, shipping and receiving.

We used Skype previously and switched because Teams is included in our Microsoft package so we were paying for it anyway. 

The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's part of an easy to manage subscription.

(November 2020)   Now, several months and a pandemic since my original review, I'm happy to say that the product has improved with better performance and increased functionality.

The features in this solution are better than Skype for Business.

The group chat is very good.

In the next release, I would like to have the interface modernized and brought more up to date.

This is a stable solution.

Scalability and adding licenses is a straightforward process. We have had no issues at all.

We have a hundred or more people using this solution. They are all end-users.

We have an enterprise agreement with premium support for this solution. We haven't had an issue but we're covered in case we do. I would not be able to judge the quality of support for a normal user.

We were using Skype for Business, but Microsoft has stopped supporting it. In 2020, they will only provide new features for Teams, and not Skype for Business, which is why we switched.

The initial setup of this solution is straightforward.

The helpdesk configured this solution for the users.

We are satisfied with the price of this solution. We have an enterprise agreement.

This is a solution that I recommend. Neither myself nor the end-users have had issues since we began using this solution.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to share documents easily.

It is challenging to sign up for a new device for the solution. It could be better.

We have been using the solution for three years. At present, we use the latest version.

I rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten.

We have more than 2000 solution users in our organization. I rate its scalability a seven out of ten.

The solution's initial setup is easy. I rate the process a nine out of ten.

The solution is very secure. I rate the solution an eight out of ten.