Microsoft Teams Reviews

We use the product for meetings and trainings. 

The solution is perfect and works pretty well. It gets your streaming and helps to get your calls. I like it a lot. 

I have faced issues with connection. Maybe, it's an issue from my side. The company accounts in Teams has some issues as well. I could not establish calls with certain domains, and then the product asked me to buy a professional account. The problem with Teams is that they are split between professional or company accounts and personal accounts. It's not very clear how you can go from one to another. That's the main issue with teams.

I have been working with the product for a year and a half. 

Teams is better and more polished than Zoom. 

The product's installation is easy and took only a few minutes to complete. 

I did the solution's installation by myself. 

The product's pro accounts are cheap. 

I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

The solution is being used for Collaboration. 

The Audio Call feature is its most valuable feature. Through this feature, seamless discussions can take place, files can be shared through one single application and the voice quality is also good. Organizations can also build their org chart and share information through emails and phone calls.

The Teams functions can be improved and some other package should be introduced. 

I have been using Microsoft Teams for two years. 

It is a stable solution. I rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

It is a scalable solution. Three hundred users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten. 

I used Slack previously. 

The initial setup is straightforward. It only took a few minutes to deploy Microsoft Teams. I rate the setup a ten out of ten. 

I would like to recommend this solution because it's a native package of Office 365. Once you have combined your ADAP account, you can use it directly. You log in to your Office 365 account and then launched the application. Also, the solution is very simple to use.

I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. 

The solution has the best feature for video calling effects. Also, its collaborative perspective allows us to integrate different calling features. We can dial out international numbers as well.

The solution's screen-sharing feature could be better compared to Webex and Zoom. There could be more accessibility control for screens shared by other representatives in a work meeting.

We have been using the solution for three to four years.

I rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten. We recently encountered some interruptions with its availability.

It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability a ten out of ten.

We have never come across any challenges with the solution's technical support. Although, from a technological perspective, there will always be room for improvement.

Positive

The solution's initial setup is easy. I rate the process a ten out of ten.

The solution is moderately expensive than other Microsoft products.

I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We use the solution as collaboration software to schedule meetings with our core team members.

The solution allows us to invite members to attend the meeting efficiently.

The solution's user interface needs to be friendlier. It is challenging to navigate the setting when I want to stop the screen-sharing feature.

We have been using the solution for a year.

We have 220 solution users in our organization.

We have never contacted the solution's technical support team, as our organization has a dedicated support team for Microsoft 365. They handle all the queries.

The solution's initial setup process is easy.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

We use Teams for customer team meetings and partner team meetings. We also use it for internal communication.

The most valuable feature for me is the chat. It is what I use the most because if I have to reach a team member, given that we are all working remotely, it is the easiest way to do it. 

The user interface needs to be improved. After six months of working with it, I still find the UI a little clunky when it comes to sharing content and moving around between features like the calendar and files. Sometimes, when I'm on a call and somebody asks if I can share a file or a link, I find it clunky to get to where those pieces are. Overall, navigation is a little sticky.

We have been using Microsoft Teams for about six months.

For what we do, it is absolutely stable. We have an enterprise team and it is used constantly.

We have had some fairly large meetings on here and I think that it scales fine.

I have never needed to contact technical support.

Prior to using Teams, we were using WebEx. We still use WebEx from time to time, but for the most part, we use Teams. It is better for us because Teams is integrated with all of the backend Microsoft environment that we already have. For example, we use SharePoint, ShareFile, and others. It has files integrated as well, so we can place internal files for review on Teams.

WebEx is more of a platform just for jumping on a call with a few people.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for communication within our function teams. We use it for project organization, etc.

The chat functionality is the solution's most valuable feature.

We occasionally have issues with synchronization between different dates. This aspect of stability needs improvement.

The solution could be better integrated with SharePoint and have better workflows especially for writing drafts for review and release. 

The solution is largely stable, but we do face issues around synchronization between different devices.

The scalability is good. It's not a problem to put more users onto the solution. We do plan to increase usage, but we'll take some time before doing so.

We previously used Skype occasionally for team communication.

The initial setup was easy. The company-wide deployment took several months.

We had an internal team handle the implementation.

I'd recommend the solution.

I'd rate the solution 7.5 out of ten.

I use Microsoft Teams on a daily basis for conference calls and chatting. Additionally, I use Microsoft Teams for managing emails.

Sharing documents in real-time has been incredibly helpful. I can share documents with my colleagues and make changes directly, which enhances our collaboration. The platform is user-friendly and has positively impacted our communication, allowing us to communicate with people from different countries and cities in real time.

Microsoft Teams could be improved through more synchronization with other platforms like Calendly and Gmail, as we also use these platforms.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for around a year.

I find Microsoft Teams to be quite stable.

I believe Microsoft Teams is pretty scalable.

I used Gmail before switching to Microsoft Teams because it was a decision made by my company.

The initial setup was easy for me.

It's a mix of both positive and negative.

I did not evaluate other options.

Microsoft Teams is pretty good, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.

The primary use case of this solution is as a collaboration platform. We use it extensively for online meetings, chat, creating specific team related sites, and sharing content between the team members.

The most valuable feature is the ability to collaborate.

Web conferencing needs improvements.

The biggest issue is web content.

We would like to have a caller's telephone number easily available to the team members.

We have been using Microsoft Teams for three to four months.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.