Odoo Reviews

We have implemented Odoo for various sectors, including logistics, finance, and service companies. The feedback has been positive due to Odoo's capability and cost-effectiveness. 

Additionally, it is flexible in customization and allows for changes without the high cost associated with other platforms.

Odoo provides a flexible system that has grown with our clients over the years, accommodating continuously changing requirements. This flexibility reduces costs compared to other legacy systems, making it a reliable and affordable option.

The most beneficial feature of Odoo is its wide community and store, allowing users to purchase solutions and resolve any problems quickly. Odoo Studio enables users to build modules without needing to code. Overall, Odoo's flexibility, user-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness are its strongest attributes.

I would like to see Odoo provide specific solutions dedicated to mid-sized and large enterprises. Having multiple versions tailored to certain sectors would greatly benefit us. 

Also, there is a lack of resources for specialized Odoo professionals.

We have been working on Odoo since 2017.

Odoo is highly stable.

Odoo is scalable, but I would rate its scalability five out of ten due to the need for more sector-specific versions.

Odoo offers very good technical support. They have offices globally, including in Dubai, and provide fast responses to issues.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward if you have technical expertise and follow the documentation.

We work as partners with Odoo, and flexibility and community support are essential for successful implementation.

The pricing is competitive and highly cost-effective. Odoo provides an affordable and flexible service.

I recommend Odoo to others seeking an affordable ERP with solid, flexible, user-friendly, and growing features. It is best to implement it step by step to avoid resistance to change.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I use Odoo primarily as our ERP system within my organization. It serves as a comprehensive solution that meets a wide range of our business needs. Odoo's capabilities extend to areas such as accounting, inventory management, sales and CRM, human resources, and more.

I find the financial module, along with the integrations of projects and the HR human resource module, to be the most valuable aspects of Odoo.

There is room for improvement in Odoo, especially in enhancing its reporting capabilities. More robust and versatile reporting options would make the system even more efficient and user-friendly.

I have been using Odoo for six years.

The solution is stable once it is fully deployed and live. There might be some issues during the initial trial and configuration phases, but after deployment, it operates smoothly. Updates are infrequent (annually), contributing to its stability.

The solution is somewhat limited in scalability in certain cases, but it has the potential for more scalability. The clients working with the solution are primarily medium-sized businesses. It may not be the best fit for smaller or larger enterprises.

The technical support is good. I would rate it as a six out of ten. To enhance support, the support team should have a strong understanding of the system's technical aspects, enabling them to offer quick and personalized assistance to users.

Neutral

Before Odoo, I had experience working with similar tools such as Microsoft Dynamics, specifically Microsoft Dynamics AX, and NetSci. These tools are often considered more cost-effective for small and medium organizations. For example, Microsoft Dynamics AX can be quite expensive in terms of licensing and support, and deployments can be complex and time-consuming. Additionally, there is a new solution called Microsoft Dynamics Integration Center, which encompasses financial and CRM modules.

The installation of Odoo itself is relatively easy, but the configuration can be a bit challenging. It often requires some adjustments to align with the specific needs and utilities of an organization, whether it is for internal use or a customer's deployment. This feedback on the installation process is consistent across various scenarios. The installation typically doesn't take much time, usually around two weeks. However, the configuration phase can vary significantly, depending on the specific needs of the organization. Factors like financial integrations, tax modules, and other customizations influence the duration of the deployment. It is highly dependent on the organization's requirements and how they choose to set up their Odoo system. The number of people needed to deploy an Odoo solution varies and depends on factors like the company's size and specific requirements. It is primarily determined by the complexity of the project and the scope of customization. For customers with minimal requirements, especially those focused on financial aspects, deploying a basic system may not demand many resources. They might opt for the free version, involving an architect, a database administrator, and a few developers. In contrast, a full ERP deployment typically requires more extensive engagement and a larger team. Maintaining Odoo is generally straightforward, with a major focus on database backup and overall system backup processes, making it a relatively easy task. Cloud-based subscriptions are increasingly favored for their convenience, while those without cloud subscriptions can still use on-premise solutions with authentication servers. The choice between these options varies, but cloud subscriptions are gaining popularity.

For Odoo, licensing options are flexible. Clients can choose to pay for licenses on a monthly or yearly basis. Some clients opt for monthly licensing for specific project-based needs, while others prefer annual payments for the core modules. The pricing is primarily based on the license itself, without additional costs for deployment, configuration, support, maintenance, and other extras, which can be discussed separately.

My advice for those considering Odoo is that it is an excellent choice for small and medium businesses as it provides comprehensive business management capabilities, easy usability, and robust reporting. However, larger enterprises with more complex needs and a higher budget might want to explore other solutions from providers like Oracle, SAP, or Dynamics, depending on their specific requirements. The choice should align with the organization's size and needs. Overall, I would rate it as a five out of ten.

We have customized it. Our developer team customized it to cater to our use cases. I use Salesforce in the user portal. So, I primarily use Odoo for its CRM capabilities.

So primarily CRM and HR for my team.

We use it for lead generation and customer/user creation, basically as a basic CRM alongside our in-house product.

We use the HR module and the general module for document upload.

The reporting and the interface could definitely be better.

Also, improved integration with other systems would be a huge benefit.

I have been using this solution for five years. 

The stability is good. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The scalability is very good. There are over 100+ end users in our company.

If I compare it to Microsoft CRM because I'm using Microsoft, it has a very nice interface.

Interface makes it easy to build a pipeline or to complete another thing. And it has a workflow for activities and tasks.

For this moment, I actually prefer Odoo for the customization. Moreover, because it is open source and easy to customize. 

The setup is simple. 

Our deploying team took care of it. It took a few hours to deploy. 

And if there are major updates, it might take a day to roll out. 

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I definitely recommend using this solution. 

We are an accounting company that collaborates with small and medium-sized businesses, offering our expertise and consulting services to analyze their business models and information. This analysis helps in making IT changes and transformations aligned with their business plans. There are several reasons why we recommend companies adopt web-based solutions.

One of these reasons is the cost savings achieved by eliminating the need to invest in hardware infrastructure. The second reason is the avoidance of the necessity to hire system experts. Lastly, because the installations are not reliant on our hardware, the state of our infrastructure becomes inconsequential. As long as our PC is operational, regardless of the operating system it runs, and as long as we can open a browser, we can access Odoo. Similar to how CMS systems work for platforms like Webex, Odoo functions as an ERP accessible through a browser, much like Amazon and Ali Express. Odoo ensures continuous communication between accounting and the warehouse, facilitating swift and efficient communication that doesn't consume excessive time.

There are three valuable features of Odoo: a browser-based user experience, the elimination of the need for system experts, and cost savings due to not requiring hardware.

The licensing cost is also significantly lower and can be adjusted based on the number of users we possess.

Odoo operates on a subscription-based model, ensuring access to the most up-to-date version at all times.

The range of choices and functionalities has space for enhancement. For instance, Odoo currently only accommodates one barcode per item. However, in reality, if an item is being exported from China to Europe and then from Europe to the United States, that item can have multiple barcodes.

Odoo operates in a distinct manner compared to traditional ERPs. It involves utilizing modules that can be developed by third-party partners like ourselves, which can then be placed on the Odoo marketplace. Numerous functionalities within Odoo have room for enhancement, a progression I'm confident will occur due to its recent entry into the ERP market when contrasted with the classic ERPs dating back to the 1980s. This is the reason why certain features they offer are comparatively less extensive than those found in the classical ERPs.

I am currently using Odoo.

Odoo is consistently available online. The only stability concern our clients might encounter is in cases where they experience local power problems and lack a backup generator to support their operations. Organizations that utilize laptops and UPS, for example, do not face any stability issues.

Odoo is highly scalable.

I would rate the initial setup of Odoo a five out of ten. The deployment never takes less than one week. To input all of our company information into Odoo, requires extensive planning over several months, if not years, depending on the scale of the operation. Following that, there's a process of extracting data from the ERP for testing, creating training materials for the staff, conducting tests once again, and finally deploying the system. For instance, consider a small company consisting of thirteen individuals who have recently graduated from high school and are aiming to initiate a car service. In their case, they can have the system up and running in a matter of hours, similar to other ERP systems.

To commence the invoicing process, we must input all our sales items along with their names, followed by the corresponding barcodes and prices into our warehouse management system. Additionally, we need to enter both our incoming costs and profit margins.

We pay based on the number of users and the amount of data, which results in a lower cost.

I would rate the price as a one out of ten, with ten being the most expensive.

I would rate Odoo eight out of ten. My primary concern is the necessity to depend on third-party developers for modules, as we are uncertain about their long-term objectives and reliability.

For small and medium businesses, it is advisable to wait for Odoo to align with the features offered by classic ERPs, instead of investing millions in infrastructure.

For companies undergoing a transformation, the decision to use Odoo is not merely based on the potentially time-consuming nature of the deployment. Instead, it revolves around the consideration of long-term costs and benefits. This is because Odoo eliminates expenses related to hardware, software, and human support.

Odoo does have some questionable aspects. Although they are performing admirably in their field, they do have third-party modules. This setup is quite similar to CMS systems, where third parties contribute additional modules. Odoo doesn't develop many of these extensions themselves; instead, they depend on their partners for that.

We've never had issues requiring the use of Odoo's technical support. If we conduct thorough research and prepare well-formulated questions for the vendors in advance, we will have a clear understanding of what we're dealing with. So, sometimes, if there is a known bug, it might not have been deployed in the system yet. Alternatively, it could be a lack of functionality, which we can suggest as an improvement, or it might involve a third-party developer. In such cases, we might express a need for a particular feature or tool and then await the release of a new software version. It's not necessarily a problem with the platform itself; rather, it's often about missing features. However, it's important to note that Odoo is continuously growing and improving. They are expanding and enhancing their offerings every day.

I use it for my company and for my customers. So, I used the solution for a project in the USA and later for a retailer. The solution is used as an ERP tool.

The way the solution deals with POS, inventories, sales, and procurement are some of the features of the solution.

The solution lacks local API support. Also, it lacks some database integration platforms. In short, it lacks an API integration platform.

Also, we have a very strong Bitnami platform, and we need integration with Odoo. In the future, I would like Oddo to consider an omnichannel API integration with Bitnami's local platform.

I have experience with Odoo for three or four years. Also, I don't know the version. I am a customer of the solution.

The product is stable.

My customers are mostly SMEs.

The product is scalable. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

The technical support is good. I rate the technical support a seven out of ten.

Neutral

The deployment is complex because we need so many customizations to fit our business. Also, it affects the solution's cost. Since it requires a complicated effort, we deploy it.

For the implementation, three stages are followed in the first phase. For its implementation, we follow a book and apply the standard deployment procedures mentioned in it. Then, we work to set up the plans and goals before doing the customization. After that, we work out a plan to implement and deploy the solution. Four to five people are required to carry out the deployment procedure. So, we usually help your customers to implement it.

The solution's pricing should have been lower. So, Odoo should consider reducing it by another twenty percent. Currently, we pay around 5000-6,000 USD per month, though I am not sure. We have to pay additionally for maintenance and support.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We have experience with Microsoft 365, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion, and Odoo. After evaluating all four ERPs, we found Odoo to be a comfortable choice for us due to its user-friendly interface, customization options, and the convenience of working within our own environment.

With Odoo, being open source is advantageous because we have access to the source code for whatever we develop. This gives us the flexibility to make additions, deletions, or modifications according to our needs without any restrictions. There are no predefined formats that limit our customization options.        

It's too early to make a definitive statement about Odoo as we are currently in the implementation stages. Once the implementation is complete and the system is up and running, we'll be able to provide feedback on its effectiveness and suitability for our needs. The implementation is very straightforward, and the system is easy to operate, similar to working with a spreadsheet. If there's one thing that could significantly enhance the system, it would be incorporating more AI capabilities.

It is currently in the implementation stage, and we've been working on it for about three months now.

So far, it's working well. Since it's an open-source solution, we have the flexibility to integrate or develop almost anything into it. It appears to be user-friendly, and even for users with legacy systems, it seems easy to navigate and use.

We haven't reached that stage yet, but so far, the response time has been good. The real test will be when everything is fully implemented. 

Positive

I have experience with SAP HANA and SAP 355, and both are excellent. However, the choice depends on the scope of work, financial considerations, and resource availability. Odoo turned out to be the most economical and user-friendly option for us, especially considering the challenges in finding SAP resources in Pakistan.

The ease of implementation is quite good. Currently, I would rate it around seven to eight.We have completed a stage of the implementation process, and currently, we are working on meeting all the T.V. requirements. As for integrations, we are actively involved in two tasks. First, we are importing five years' worth of data into Odoo using their well-structured templates and CSV file capabilities. Second, we are integrating with Primera, and so far, the testing has been successful, and everything seems to be working well.

Odoo is straightforward in terms of costs. You pay the vendor for both the software and implementation. We selected one of the twelve certified vendors for implementation in our local area, opting for the vendor named Four Zero Five.

I would keep my rating at eight. The deployment has been smooth, with minimal changes required. However, I may have a more comprehensive assessment after Monday when the Odoo team is scheduled to explain various aspects, considering the numerous modules we have installed.

We primarily use the solution for customer relationship management, accounting, sales, human resources modules and the basic modules for a company. We deploy it on public cloud.

We have all our information centralized and automated based on finance, accounting, and purchase flows. It is more organized within the company so it has prevented us from struggling with information disseminated in different PCs or computer folders. Through this, we can pull the information from one application containing all the information needed for running our company.

There is no particular feature we find valuable as we find the whole solution valuable because it's an enterprise solution with several modules. It's convenient that we have an all-in-one holistic solution.

Each year they launch a new version, and the user experience is really good. The solution is complete and it has more than 60 modules. You can go to the community and explore more than 400,000 applications from any person that decides to develop the application. So it's a comprehensive community that adds value to the product.

There are some modules, like documents, that can be included in the community edition because they have the most important features in the enterprise edition. Sometimes, there are features that cannot be opened in the community edition and from a user perspective. We would like to have all the modules in the community edition and enjoy all the functionalities.

For example, when we are trying to use a document function for scanning an invoice, we need to buy credits for each invoice, which can get a little bit complicated. Hence, they can simplify the business model for credits related to certain specifications or modules.

We have used the solution for three years and are currently using version 13.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable.

It takes between eight hours and a day to deploy the solution.

We implemented the solution in-house, and maximum of staff are required for deployment.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by simplifying the business model for credits related to certain specifications or modules.

Odoo is very powerful in terms of accounting.

Odoo is widespread in a lot of different industries, and the most powerful feature of Odoo in the manufacturing industry is the forecast. The forecast in sales, purchases, and inventory really helps the decision-making for sales and purchases. Both sales/purchase and inventory forecasts are helpful.

On the other hand, the accounting analytic packs are the most powerful feature in the non-manufacturing sector. They can create lots of account information without creating separate master data. In contrast to SAP, they use cost centers, but the cost center is centralized and can only do so much.

Odoo’s asset management, supply chain, and advanced manufacturing should be improved. We need to customize the budgeting every time. Many companies need budgeting modules, and Odoo doesn't provide a powerful budgeting module. So we ended up creating the asset management, the budgeting, and the other adjustment for supply chains and advanced manufacturing.

A new budgeting feature is necessary because it can span across different industries. On the other hand, the most valuable thing Odoo can do is pay more attention to its partnership and everything that follows, considering the tough competition.

Unlike the other system we also use, we must compete with other Odoo vendors. There is one system principal we've been partnering with aside from Odoo that is very keen on maintaining good relationships with their implementation partners and locking clients into one particular partner. If the other partner has the solution, collaboration occurs rather than competition. I think Odoo should head towards that direction. 

I have been using Odoo for maybe one or two years, but my company has worked with it for five or more years.

Odoo is quite a stable solution.

I rate Odoo a seven or eight out of ten for stability.

The solution’s scalability is quite high, considering its cheap user license pricing and the ability to merge and consolidate other companies in one place.

The solution is mostly used by mid-sized companies wanting to expand to the enterprise level. Odoo, with its low cost, is the most suitable tool for them.

I rate Odoo a six out of ten for scalability.

Odoo's initial setup depends on the complexity of the client and the company. It can be very simple or very complicated.

On a scale from one to ten, where one means high price, and ten means low price, I rate Odoo's pricing a five or six out of ten.

Odoo's deployment type depends on the country and the cloud literacy in that area. In Southeast Asia, cloud literacy is low. Some firmly believe that on-premise is the best solution, and others use the cloud because they don't want to handle it.

Overall, I rate Odoo a seven out of ten.