SAP ERP Reviews

Predominantly, we are using SAP as an ERP solution.

It's a good ERP system.

Agility is an area that needs to improve. The speed to build and the speed to deliver could be better.

I have been using this solution for two years.

It's a stable product.

This solution is scalable.

We are looking for different options to connect to SAP.

I would rate SAP ERP a seven out of ten.

As a manager/team leader and developer with a strong technical background, I work with all aspects of the system in various industries and use cases.

SAP ECC consolidates five to seven back-office systems under one platform in our organization.

The power of ABAP Development Tools is the main valuable feature in the SAP ECC system. Every couple of years SAP upgrades ABAP technology significantly, which facilitates developers' work.

The user interface has room for improvement. SAP is working on it and the improvements are on the way.

I encountered issues due to human error. SAP support solved the problems. Technical support for customers has improved a lot. It includes live chat support so, in some cases, you can get answers to solve your problem immediately.

SAP ECC is not cheap but I consider it the best system for managing an organization's data and processes.

SAP ERP is the best product for managing all back-office processes in a large organization. All data is stored in a single system which includes one database.

We use two modules. Materials Management (MM) handles the procurement-to-payment process, from inventory through final invoice receipt and verification. Master Data Governance (MDG) centrally creates, changes, and distributes or consolidates master data across the complete enterprise system landscape.

It gives us full control over each change, to the level of the individual field in a master record, including certificates.

MDG provides a central location for governance of the creation/updating processes of master data. It allows you to change several fields in the same object. For example, we can change a field on the purchasing view and change another field on an accounting view to the same material at the same time.

The UI could use improvement.

• Procurement
• Warehousing
• Inventory management

SAP ERP has created a paperless environment for us. We used to have an electronic system but at some stage it was required to be recorded manually on paper. Also there were some other issues, for the maintenance approval, a hard copy was required but now these sort of approvals are through the system.

Every activity creates its own unique Document Number even in the same line of action. For example, if it issues some materials using activity code 201, and then a reversal using code 202 our reference # should be the same, with the same line number. In the backend, a separate document number can be created.

Also PR should be the reference number from creation until the materials are received by the common users.

Since 2010.

Data transfer was an issue.

No

Satisfactory.

6 out of 10

Yes, and the decision to switch came from management.

Complex as there was a lot of data conversion involved

We used a vendor team, expertise was 6/10.

Good

Not known but costly.

DBS, and ASI were also considered but management chose ERP.

Positive solution.

We use SAP ERP for finance, manufacturing, and purchasing.

It integrates most of the areas from a financial point of view and helps the company track operations on a global level.

I like that SAP ERP is very robust and stable.

It could be more flexible, and the company should be able to adapt the system. Not the other way around. It's very rigid and difficult to change. Reporting could also be better.

We have been using SAP ERP in our company for 15 to 20 years.

SAP ERP is a stable solution.

It's very scalable. It's just a matter of cost. We have 100 to 150 users at the moment.

Technical support is available anywhere, and it's easy to find.

The initial setup is very complex.

SAP ERP is expensive.

I would tell potential users that the implementation could be very complex. It's key to have clarity about the company processes from the beginning before implementing SAP ERP. If you don't, the company processes will have to be adapted to the SAP standard way of working.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give SAP ERP a seven.

We mainly use SAP ERP for business and business process improvements.

SAP ERP has a good user interface with a lot of functionalities and good interface options.

It would be better if SAP ERP offered more competitive pricing. It would also help if it were more open, more flexible, with more standard products.

I have been using SAP ERP for the last 15 years.

SAP ERP is a stable solution.

The scalability of SAP ERP depends on different modules.

SAP ERP technical support has been really good. All SAP support has been really good. Response time is good, and they have a good understanding of the product.

It wasn't easy to install SAP ERP. It has its own sequence of steps that we need to follow, but it isn't that complicated.

The licensing costs are slightly on the higher side. They need to make it more competitive.

I would recommend SAP ERP to potential customers.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give SAP ERP an eight.

I worked with some other ERPs previously and I am a computer engineer. I find it to be very stable in comparison to other systems. There is no downtime. That's important to us due to the fact that we have companies around the world and don't have specific service hours. It needs to constantly be running, and it can do that beautifully.

The architecture of the solution overall is great. It's great for development, testing, and production. I've worked with solutions where the architecture wasn't as strong and it was a disaster.

The integration of the solution is great.

The system is very big. It is not exactly user-friendly, due to the fact that it's so massive and complex.

You need to put a lot of data into the system in order to get something out of it.

The solution is expensive.

Our company began using SAP during its first installation in Slovenia. We've used it since 1998. It's been more than 20 years at this point, so more than two decades of working with the solution.

The solution is stable. There are no concerns there. We don't have bugs or glitches. It works extremely well and it reliable.

The solution is very scalable. It's quite a sizeable product, to begin with. Users would have no problem expanding it out if they need to.

We have around 1,000 users on the solution currently.

Technical support has largely been very supportive of our company. If we need an SAP developer, we're able to get one. However, the solution has been so stable so far there have been very few problems in general, so we haven't needed much help. Overall, we are satisfied with the level of support we get.

We require 10-12 people to handle the maintenance on the solution.

The pricing of the solution could be a bit lower. It's on the more expensive side, as far as solutions go.

We're just a customer. We don't have any kind of business relationship with SAP. We aren't consultants or resellers.

We use SAP ERP, and on the other side, on the office side, and the user side, we are straight Microsoft.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's not exactly user-friendly and is quite a sizeable solution. If it weren't for that and the high price tag I might rate it a bit higher.

We run our entire business from order receipt to invoicing. We also do manufacturing, purchasing, invoice control, billing, and reporting on SAP.

It integrates everything into one process.

There will always be something within our business that it won't fit.

The scalability is good.

They have dealt with our issues well. The technical support is good.

Think of processes as not being linear. Think of them as being three dimensional. You have to consider not just what you want to achieve out of processes, but also if there are secondary consequences.

Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: Whether the product is compatible with SAP.