Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Appian Logo

Appian Reviews

Vendor: Appian
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
3,100 followers
Start review

What is Appian?

Get the report
Helped 842,466 peers since 2012

Featured Appian reviews

Appian mindshare

As of March 2025, the mindshare of Appian in the Business Process Management (BPM) category stands at 6.1%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)

PeerAnalyst reports based on Appian reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryBusiness Process Management (BPM)Mar 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 28, 2025Download
ComparisonAppian vs CamundaMar 28, 2025Download
ComparisonAppian vs Apache AirflowMar 28, 2025Download
ComparisonAppian vs Automation AnywhereMar 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)3.91.2%93%182 interviewsAdd to research
Camunda4.121.5%89%77 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
29%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
University
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Media Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Non Profit
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare Appian with alternative products

Learn more about Appian

Appian customers

Related questions

 

Appian reviews

Sort by:
Srimanta Pandit - PeerSpot user
Senior Consultant at Protiviti consulting
Verified user of Appian
Apr 22, 2024
Flexible, improves operational efficiency, and reduces the time taken to complete processes

Pros

"The tool is very flexible."

Cons

"It is difficult to set up the on-premise version."
RAVIRANJAN - PeerSpot user
Project Manager at Telus Digital
Verified user of Appian
May 25, 2022
Low-code with good reliability and good workflows

Pros

"The initial setup is easy."

Cons

"There could be a scope of enhancement for capturing the variety of use cases."
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian. Updated March 2025
842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Nitin-Agarwal - PeerSpot user
Delivery Manager (Intelligent Business Automation) - Pega at Persistent Systems
Verified user of Appian
Jan 28, 2025
Seamless integration enhances workflows while memory optimization can improve complex processes

Pros

"It is easy for me to define the process and create configurable workflows."

Cons

"If there is a very complex process that includes a lot of data transitioning and memory-centric processes, it consumes a lot of memory."
Devashish Mishra - PeerSpot user
Client Partner at Peristent Systems
Verified user of Appian
Apr 25, 2023
Product version discussed: Many versions
Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable

Pros

"The most valuable features of Appian are the VPN engine, it is fast, lightweight, and easy to set up business rules. Business teams can do it by themselves. That is a very good feature."

Cons

"Occasionally, certain pre-made modules may not be necessary and customers may desire greater customization options. Instead of being limited to pre-designed features, they may prefer a more flexible version that allows for greater customization."
Mason Turvey - PeerSpot user
Robotic Process Automation Engineer at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Verified user of Appian
Aug 6, 2022
Stands out with its integration capabilities, but the backend modeling can be streamlined a little bit

Pros

"It has good integrations. We were looking for out-of-the-box integration with both on-prem and publicly accessible data sources. We needed integration with the cloud, OData, our REST API feed, and then on-prem passthrough to go to a SQL database or on-prem APIs through Azure local deployment, etc."

Cons

"The tool itself is pretty good, but the main area that we struggled with was the backend. The frontend development is really good, but the backend modeling can be streamlined a little bit. There are good integrations, but tying them through the data layer and then up into the frontend could be improved a little bit. It does read/write on the data source, and you can configure it to just write or just read, but there is a little bit of work involved. "
Vladimir Vasilev - PeerSpot user
Digital Lead at Baker Tilly
Verified user of Appian
Apr 8, 2023
Product version discussed: 23.1
Excellent support with a quick development cycle and competitive pricing

Pros

"Technical support has been amazing overall. "

Cons

"If we could calculate the amount of data that will be realized, it would help us a lot. "
Pankaj  Khera - PeerSpot user
Sr AVP - EXL Digital at EXL Services
Verified user of Appian
Mar 8, 2024
Facilitates quick and efficient application development with minimal coding required but has limitations regarding the use of external components

Pros

"With low-code, we don't need a lot of coding, and then from the plumbing perspective, there is a complete CI/CD pipeline that exists within Appian that can be leveraged for open deployment. "

Cons

"There are some restrictions with respect to using external components within Appian. So, for example, if we do not have a particular feature available, there's a long cycle of getting approvals and all of that. That does not offer flexibility, which definitely can be improved on."
GauravJain3 - PeerSpot user
Export Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Verified user of Appian
Nov 28, 2022
Product version discussed: 22.3
Low-code, faster time-to-market, and helpful support

Pros

"The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."

Cons

"There should be more flexibility for the developers to choose the look and feel of the UI. They should have a better ability to design their widgets and customize them with different colors, shapes, and sizes. That is a limitation that could be improved upon."