Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Auth0?

Get the report
Helped 872,098 peers since 2012

Featured Auth0 reviews

Auth0 mindshare

Product category:
As of October 2025, the mindshare of Auth0 in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category stands at 19.4%, down from 22.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Auth019.4%
Ping Identity Platform11.8%
ForgeRock10.7%
Other58.1%
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

PeerResearch reports based on Auth0 reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryCustomer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)Oct 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersOct 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAuth0 vs Ping Identity PlatformOct 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAuth0 vs Omada IdentityOct 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAuth0 vs Microsoft Entra External IDOct 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Entra ID4.3N/A95%236 interviewsAdd to research
Cloudflare One4.4N/A100%21 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business224
Midsize Enterprise110
Large Enterprise419
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Government
4%
University
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Insurance Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Construction Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Training & Coaching Company
1%

Compare Auth0 with alternative products

Learn more about Auth0

Auth0 customers

Related questions

 
Auth0 Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Manager, Customer Success at Cloudworks5.0I am a reseller whose customers use Auth0 mainly for B2B purposes, valuing its customizability and effective multi-factor authentication. While its features are excellent, the pricing could be improved with a 20-25% reduction.
CTO at Lambda-X Ophthalmics4.5I use Auth0 as an identity provider for my SaaS platform due to its ease of integration and beneficial features like social media integration. However, I am disappointed by the lack of a standard user profile with basic information.
Director Cloud Software Development at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees4.5We use Auth0 for user and role management in multi-tenant applications, benefiting from its multifactor authentication and compliance features. While it enhances security and simplifies management, it lacks robust self-managed user tools, requiring custom solutions for tenant provisioning.
Full Stack PHP/Python AWS Developer at Binary Port5.0We use Auth0 for API security and management, integrating with APIs like Salesforce and HubSpot. Its runtime-generated API keys offer strong security. While the solution is efficient, improved Salesforce documentation would help. Security benefits outweigh previous options like Google Authenticator.
Co-Founder at Product Fusion4.0I use Auth0 to simplify login and sign-up integration, benefiting from its user-friendly resources and tutorials. However, it's pricey for small developers and needs improved organizational features. Previously, I used Keycloak and am considering SuperTokens or Lock as alternatives.
Principal Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees4.0No summary available
SW Engineer at LVL2373.5Auth0 needs improvement in offering application configurations, a third-party provisioning application, and better MFA features compared to Okta and Microsoft Authenticator. It primarily relies on email-based MFA and lacks mobile apps for enhanced functionality.
System Architect at Skai4.5We use Auth0 for customer authentication due to its flexibility, powerful features, and integrations. While the Organizations feature is promising, it lacks customization. Despite some cost concerns, outsourcing authentication has overall been worthwhile and reduced support burdens.