SharePoint Reviews

SharePoint offers high value by reducing costs through the elimination of multiple cloud services. Many organizations have experienced significant financial benefits, including streamlining operations and moving towards paperless environments. Users report enhanced document management and improved efficiency through centralized data control. SharePoint's capability enables departments to develop applications and create dedicated sites for various business needs, allowing widespread access to essential files and information. Organizations find it cheaper and more useful than larger management systems.

SharePoint pricing and licensing vary significantly based on organization size, usage needs, and existing agreements with Microsoft. Office 365 can provide a cost-effective solution, especially for smaller companies, while larger enterprises might prefer the on-premises option for flexibility. Licensing can be complex, needing careful planning and potentially involving additional costs for features or third-party integrations. A customized approach with professional guidance can streamline setup and ensure business alignment with SharePoint's offerings.

• "The solution's pricing is relatively expensive because it's bundled with other products."
• "It comes bundled with the Microsoft 365 pricing plans."
• "The product is reasonably priced."

Organizations primarily utilize SharePoint for document management and collaboration, serving as a central repository for document sharing, multi-user collaboration, and content management. It supports Intranet and Extranet functions, integrating with various systems like Office 365, Power Apps, and D365 for workflow automation and project management. Many companies use SharePoint for storing and sharing internal and client-specific documents, facilitating efficient communication and data organization across different departments and teams.

SharePoint's customer service and support vary greatly. Some find it satisfactory, citing Microsoft's professional approach, online resources, and community support. Others experience challenges, particularly due to high costs or slow response times. Support quality often depends on the individual's interaction, contractual agreements, or third-party providers. For some, direct Microsoft assistance requires additional purchases, leading them to use Microsoft partners or internal resources. There is consistent praise for the robustness of community forums and external consultants.

Initial setup experiences with SharePoint varied significantly. Many found it straightforward, aided by Microsoft's wizard and documentation, while others experienced complexity, especially with proper planning or for large-scale environments. Complexity often arose from understanding roles, infrastructure requirements, and user profiles. Some users found migration processes slow or experienced challenges with permissions and architecture. Professional assistance or prior knowledge in IT helped streamline the process, while cloud-based setups were easier for some organizations.

SharePoint scales well when properly configured, especially in virtual environments. Some experience challenges with specific features or site limitations, but others find the system handles growing user numbers and data loads effectively. Organizations utilizing Office 365 report smoother scalability experiences. Planning and configuration remain crucial, as varied experiences highlight the importance of IT expertise in implementation. Many praise its scalability strength while addressing some hurdles related to cost and infrastructure planning.

SharePoint stability is generally satisfactory for many users, though challenges may arise due to infrastructure, large data volumes, or specific updates. Some users experience outages or performance degradation associated with Microsoft services or updates. Proper deployment and adherence to best practices significantly enhance stability, while failures often stem from poor planning or incorrect setup. Notably, many emphasize a robust infrastructure and governance, reporting a stable experience. Users often rate stability highly, attributing issues to external factors.