Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Huntress comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
9.0
Huntress support is praised for prompt, knowledgeable, and proactive service, consistently rated excellent by users for reliability and responsiveness.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.9
Huntress needs enhanced reporting, better integration, expanded features, improved dashboards, and seamless AV and endpoint protection integration.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Huntress scales efficiently with rapid deployment, high responsiveness, and minimal expansion effort, supporting diverse user needs and endpoints.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Huntress is priced per endpoint, seen as fair due to consistent development, with adaptive, cost-effective enterprise pricing.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.6
Huntress is highly rated for stability and reliable performance, with minor compatibility issues, ensuring seamless low-impact integration.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.6
Huntress provides 24/7 threat detection, automatic remediation, and AI-enhanced security, ideal for small to medium businesses.
The automated remediation feature also provides significant value.
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Huntress
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
9th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (10th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is 3.4%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Kevin Mabry - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides telemetry, risk assessment, and behavior monitoring
I like the risk assessment tool built into Bitdefender GravityZone EDR because I'm really into risk assessments and vulnerability testing. I think that is crucial and needed, and I don't see that often with most EDRs. The telemetry I get from the tool can be used in a SOC I use. The solution has behavior monitoring that allows you to monitor people's specific behaviour and practices. You can then ask the person to stop or start doing something. You can also do application management and access management. You can do many things within Bitdefender GravityZone EDR because it is like a one-stop shop scenario.
Andy Larin - PeerSpot reviewer
Effortless to use and is one of the easiest products to deploy
Huntress is effortless to use. It's one of the easiest products to deploy. Pushing out through our RMM is simple, and using it is straightforward once it's on a machine. The end user doesn't have to do anything. Everything comes back to us. I love that the alerts are human-curated. They take a look at alerts before we get them. Other products are very noisy. They'll send you an alert about anything. About 95 percent of those alerts go to Huntress first. They check to make sure that it's real and only alert us if it's actionable, something that requires our attention. When I get an alert from Huntress, it must be looked at. I love that. It saves a ton of time for my people. It can fix low-severity threats. Their team is 24/7, whereas my team is not. We want them to take action on known bad things. Sometimes, that means fixing the problem or isolating the machine so multiple machines aren't getting hit. I love that they can address those issues within a very short time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra?
They need to improve the dashboard by adding a dedicated executive view. This view should provide executives with a clear overview of what's happening. Also, the UI needs to be more user-friendly, ...
What do you like most about Huntress?
It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry.
What needs improvement with Huntress?
One issue is the managed antivirus. Huntress takes control of the antivirus built into Windows Defender, but it doesn't if, for some reason, Defender isn't working properly and doesn't attempt to f...
What is your primary use case for Huntress?
We roll Huntress out across the board. It's in our base security shield, so we use it everywhere. We also use ThreatLocker. It's an application for allowlisting and blocklisting. It blocks any soft...
 

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, Bitdefender GravityZone
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mentor Graphics, Rudersdal Kommune
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Huntress and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.