Bizagi vs TIBCO Business Studio comparison

"Very, very stable."

"One of the features I like is that when drawing any task, when putting a task on the process model canvas, I can simply click on it and see the other task icons for that task. It's just one quick, simple, straightforward connectivity from task to task."

"The visualizations and attachments provided by the product are valuable."

"The user interface is pretty good."

"Business process modelling and simulation."

"The initial setup is super simple."

"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand."

"Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"There could be more documentation."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"Can be difficult for new users."

"I don't know if it's a problem with my operating system or a Bizagi problem, but many times I see that when I try to connect different activities, they show up as not connected."

"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."

"The solution needs to make it easier to use RPA products on it. They may need an RPA specific interface. It would be better than having to make an RPA tool to use for viewing. Most of our work is about making RPA tools with the Bizagi, not using Bizagi itself."

"It needs some better notation functionality."

"Difficult to export in formats other than PDF."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"The interface is actually quite confusing."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"I used to be very pleased with the pricing. Now, it's a bit more complicated. I don't remember exactly, however, it might be $10 a month per user."

"The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."

"It is not expensive."

"I think that its price is reasonable."

"We use the free version of the solution because the price is in dollars, making it expensive for where we are in Brazil."

"The modeling part of the software is free. Most of the time, it is used for this purpose."

"This is a free solution."

"It is only necessary to pay for licenses when ready to deploy applications to production."

"For my company, the tool costs about 2,0,000 Euros for three years...If one is bad and ten is good, I rate the price as one out of ten."