Bizagi vs TIBCO Business Studio comparison

"I like the ease of use and the fact that you can download and use their free version, which is unlimited. However, while it's unlimited use, some features aren't available."

"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."

"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard."

"The main feature of Bizagi is the speed to which we can automate processes and how we can modify them without a strong impact on the end users."

"The ability to write our own code inside each activity is beneficial. Sometimes we need to create functionality that doesn't come out of the box, and this allows us to do that."

"The most valuable feature is that it is compatible with Visual Studio and .NET, and we can program it. Its speed is very good, and it is also stable and easy to deploy."

"The visualizations and attachments provided by the product are valuable."

"The user interface is pretty good."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"The setup cost is definitely reasonable."

"In business process mapping, you have pools and dark pools. I don't see that Bizagi differentiates between a regular pool and a dark pool."

"Also, the tool sometimes feels not so mature when we find random deploy errors from testing to production environment."

"The solution's interface could be a bit more user-friendly and I would like to see more integrations with other Office products, not just Office 365."

"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."

"It needs some better notation functionality."

"The on-premise software has some bugs."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"It works slowly on the cloud, sometimes."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"The interface is actually quite confusing."

"An artificial intelligence feature that evaluates the quality of the code developed with one click would definitely be good."

"The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."

"It has a very high price. Many clients complain about the price for maintaining the application on Bizagi."

"It is not expensive."

"For the prices, we didn't try a negotiations about licensing or pricing, but if i can say a word about this, I find Bizagi prices to be well thought out."

"Pricing is good value for money."

"My company uses the free version of the product."

"We use the free version of the solution because the price is in dollars, making it expensive for where we are in Brazil."

"I think that its price is reasonable."

"For my company, the tool costs about 2,0,000 Euros for three years...If one is bad and ten is good, I rate the price as one out of ten."