

Box and Hyland OnBase are prominent contenders in the content management and collaboration sector. Box stands out for its user-friendly interface and collaboration features, while Hyland OnBase is favored for handling complex business processes with robust customization.
Features: Box provides collaboration tools, robust security, and extensive third-party integrations, making it ideal for diverse environments. It's recognized for being device agnostic and simplifies file sharing. In contrast, Hyland OnBase is known for its comprehensive content management solutions, adaptable to various industries, with a strong focus on security, stability, and growth capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Box users desire enhanced search capabilities, better integration, and improved role management, noting performance issues linked to security settings. Hyland OnBase users suggest improving the usability of its interface, expanding both localization and OCR capabilities, and simplifying workflows and migration processes. Concerns regarding pricing models and regional pricing inconsistency are also highlighted.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Box offers flexible deployment in both public and cloud environments, with responsive customer support, though accessing higher-tier assistance can be difficult. It is noted for positive user experiences. Hyland OnBase focuses on on-premises deployments with room for extensive customization but can require additional training to address deployment complexity.
Pricing and ROI: Box appears cost-efficient, particularly for educational bodies, with perceived high initial costs offset by its feature-rich offering. It provides notable ROI through operational efficiency and compliance risk reduction. Although perceived as expensive, Hyland OnBase's modular nature allows for detailed customization to optimize business processes, with recognized ROI in workflow efficiencies despite regional pricing disparities.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
I have been able to see a return on investment as the time for approvals has been reduced, and since they are centralized, everything is in one place.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I would describe the customer service and technical support of Hyland OnBase as being based on the partner that is used.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
I am uncertain about its effectiveness at an enterprise level, where SharePoint might be preferred.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
Box was very stable and did not have any latency issues.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
If Box had an AI feature to summarize and identify documents based on their contents, it would significantly enhance usability.
To open and see who is accessing the document now and see my movements across the document or the file we are sharing together.
Collaborative editing was challenging if multiple people were in a document at once.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.
The experience with the platform's learning curve is quite steep, especially for less technical staff.
I found the pricing reasonable because when I was working for an IBM partner, Box was free for us.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
The main factors that influenced my decision to choose Hyland OnBase over other options available on the market were the cost compared to others and the high document-handling capacity that Hyland OnBase can provide.
Box's security features have helped my organization meet compliance needs.
The best features of Box for me include the structured file organizing, which is the most important part I found.
The stability and latency were excellent, and there were no issues encountered, ensuring efficient file storage and retrieval.
The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The best features that Hyland OnBase offers are the security it provides to control permissions and the traceability of documents.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyland OnBase | 5.1% |
| Box | 3.8% |
| Other | 91.1% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Box offers seamless integration with third-party apps, strong collaboration tools, and secure content distribution to enhance productivity across devices.
Box is a powerful platform for file storage and collaboration, known for its security, ease of use, and advanced integration options. Supporting seamless synchronization and real-time editing, Box facilitates effective teamwork and secure sharing of content both internally and externally. Though it faces challenges such as folder-level security and collaboration speed, Box remains a preferred choice for enterprises seeking efficient document management and secure file transfers. Its robust feature set, including metadata management and customizable permissions, supports remote work and facilitates easy access to stored documents and workflows.
What are the key features of Box?
Why do users appreciate using Box?
In industries like finance, healthcare, and legal, Box is employed for secure document storage and sharing, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Teams leverage its features for secure project collaboration, e-signatures, and handling large files, making it invaluable in sectors requiring strict data management protocols.
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.