Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Fusion Service vs SAP CRM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
Oracle Fusion Service boosts ROI by 30% through tailored payments, efficiency, loyalty, and streamlined operations, despite some unquantified returns.
Sentiment score
6.6
Sales and revenue increased; operational efficiency justifies costs, but Salesforce suits large organizations more than smaller ones long-term.
Within CRM, I have worked on B2C service and sales extensively.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.6
Oracle Fusion Service offers good support, hindered by inconsistency, but escalations often enhance service quality and response time.
Sentiment score
7.0
Customer service is responsive and reliable, with 24/7 support, although customization and response times can vary.
Sometimes the technical support is knowledgeable and helpful.
Customer service varies as sometimes I receive a good response, and other times I need to escalate issues and involve engineers from Oracle in an OWC session.
I am satisfied with their response time and quality.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Oracle Fusion Service efficiently scales from small teams to large enterprises, supporting diverse operational needs across locations.
Sentiment score
8.1
SAP CRM excels in scalability, efficiently supporting numerous users and large data volumes while integrating various business functions.
Initially, we had ten ERPs, and I have added more since.
Regarding scalability, the solution provides useful configurations that clients can utilize effectively.
In terms of scalability with data and number of users, I would give it a nine out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Oracle Fusion Service is highly stable, achieving 90% uptime with minor outages, rated 8-9/10 by organizations.
Sentiment score
8.1
SAP CRM is stable and reliable, with occasional issues, but generally offers smooth operation and minimal downtime.
If work continues for a long time without publishing, it tends to get corrupted, requiring deletion and rework from the ground up.
 

Room For Improvement

Oracle Fusion Service needs enhancements in B2B customization, UI/UX, technical support, and improving mobile application functionality and attractiveness.
SAP CRM requires UI enhancements, better integration, real-time analytics, increased flexibility, and modern tech adoption for future growth.
When dealing with bulk data uploads via a BDI process, some records occasionally fail, requiring me to debug and reprocess them.
Simpler integration capabilities.
It is currently restricted to Groovy scripting.
I am happy with SAP CRM because whenever we have requirements for changes or customization as per our needs, we get them, and the downtime is minimal.
 

Setup Cost

Oracle Fusion Service is costly with variable pricing, depending on users, data, integrations, and geographical location.
SAP CRM is costly, targeting large enterprises, with high setup costs but competitive features; price cuts could increase appeal.
Regarding licensing cost, according to each country's conditions, for Egypt, it's so expensive.
I think it's expensive, yet it does not pose a threat, making it costly for my enterprise.
SAP CRM is not suitable for small companies because of the cost.
 

Valuable Features

Oracle Fusion Service enhances customer engagement with omni-channel communication, AI tools, and scalable cloud-based architecture for seamless integration.
SAP CRM provides customizable reporting, seamless ERP integration, real-time data, enhancing customer management and improving business processes globally.
The company has invested in ERP Cloud, and the seeded APIs and VIP features allow for customization using Groovy script.
Based on utilizing Groovy scripts and JavaScript, we can integrate with other external systems.
For HCM, it makes the life of users easier for self-service, payroll run, and applying tax according to the country, where different tax laws according to the country are very easy in Fusion.
If there is any error in our machine, a log is automatically generated, and from SAP CRM, we can see that the machine has problems.
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Fusion Service
Ranking in CRM
12th
Ranking in Marketing Management
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
CRM Customer Engagement Centers (4th)
SAP CRM
Ranking in CRM
3rd
Ranking in Marketing Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Local Government CRM (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Oracle Fusion Service is 0.8%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP CRM is 3.9%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP CRM3.9%
Oracle Fusion Service0.8%
Other95.3%
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

Dhivakar I - PeerSpot reviewer
Have faced persistent configuration issues and performance delays that slow down large workflows
From a developer's perspective, it could be more open for programming language configurations. It is currently restricted to Groovy scripting. While UI and UX designs are open to JavaScript configurations, there are restrictions on certain functions that can be used. The solution could be enhanced to better serve customers when dealing with complex programs. The customer's websites face issues with loading properly, and response time gets longer when implementing larger workflows. This could be improved to achieve lower response times even with larger workflows involving multiple system integrations and complex architecture. The agent decay capabilities need improvement in future releases. Currently, there are some agent decay configurations available for developers to implement, but this area needs enhancement. Performance issues exist in the Sandbox area. The Sandbox is a trial area for configurations, but if work continues for a long time without publishing, it tends to get corrupted, requiring deletion and rework from the ground up. This has caused significant rework and effort multiple times. Technical support can be challenging to work with. When facing product-related issues or configuration problems, the support experience varies. Sometimes the technical support is knowledgeable and helpful, but often they redirect problems elsewhere and cause delays in resolution.
Srini-Dhanaraj - PeerSpot reviewer
The product is stable, it has a lot of features, and the user interface is excellent
SAP C4C is very simple. We used it for a simple module, like lead and opportunity. The integration capabilities on the cloud are a bit rigid. It is not flexible. When people visit websites, we take the cookies, try to create leads and communicate with them. Organizations that want to buy the product must consider their return on investment and why they need SAP. They must consider why they cannot use any other product. If the business process is complex and we need good integration, we can choose SAP. The solution is complex for businesses where people place orders and make payments. We will have to integrate the solution with a data warehouse for the communication to go in and out. I rate the product a five out of ten for such a scenario. If an organization only does sales and marketing, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
12%
University
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise27
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle Service Cloud?
From a developer's perspective, it could be more open for programming language configurations. It is currently restricted to Groovy scripting. While UI and UX designs are open to JavaScript configu...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Service Cloud?
I have been working on implementing Oracle Fusion Service to mainly higher education industry clients and one banking client. Before that, I was working with financial services-based solutions for ...
What do you like most about SAP CRM?
Getting the right information at the right time across different programs is important. These programs lack interaction between them. IPA is a good option to bring them together.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP CRM?
SAP CRM is not suitable for small companies because of the cost. It is suitable for medium and large enterprise companies.
What needs improvement with SAP CRM?
Recently, the price of SAP CRM has increased, which is one concern. Another issue is that sometimes we experience slow performance. Reports in SAP CRM itself can become very slow. Other than that, ...
 

Also Known As

Oracle Service Cloud, Oracle RightNow
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pacifico Seguros Generales, Elsevier B.V., Madison Area Technical College, Bigtree Entertainment, Pvt. Ltd., HM Land Registry, Walmart Stores Inc., MakeMyTrip Ltd., Orbitz Worldwide LLC, Big Fish Games Inc.
Brau Union Osterreich AG, Nu Skin Enterprises Inc., AOK Bundesverband, RAK Ceramics, NHS 24, Wholesale Sports Outdoor Outfitters, FC Bayern Munchen AG, Tumi, The Kellogg Company, MVV Energie AG, Anglian Water Services, German Football Association (DFB), Nebraska Book Company Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Fusion Service vs. SAP CRM and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.