ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Reviews

We are using ESET Endpoint Security to protect our PCs.

Most of our clients are not hooked directly to the internet limiting the chance of threats.

The most valuable feature in ESET Endpoint Security is the game mode to restrict notifications.

The user interface of ESET Endpoint Security could be more user-friendly and more features could be added.

I have been using ESET Endpoint Security for approximately 10 years

ESET Endpoint Security is highly stable.

The scalability of ESET Endpoint Security is good. We can buy more licenses if we add a computer or two.

I have used the support from ESET Endpoint Security.

I rate the support from ESET Endpoint Security a five out of five.

I have not used another solution other than ESET Endpoint Security.

The initial setup of ESET Endpoint Security is very simple.

We do not have any maintenance costs because it is a stable solution. We do not have notifications and we do scans when needed. 

I rate the price of ESET Endpoint Security a five out of five.

The price of the solution is very good compared to other solutions.

I rate ESET Endpoint Security a five out of ten.

We are customers and resellers of ESET. 

We use all the features that ESET offers, and I particularly like the endpoint feature. 

We are constantly facing new threats and if ESET could incorporate an implementable feature that wouldn't require us to buy an additional product to protect the endpoint, that would be very good. 

I've been using this solution for almost four years. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable, we've implemented it in every workstation in the company. We have close to 350 licenses. We have just one person dealing with maintenance, the solution updates every day from the internet. Any new upgrades self-implement. 

Our administrator is usually the one that has contact with technical support. We can email them when necessary and we have a good relationship with them. It's very good for us.

We previously used a different endpoint solution but I don't remember the name. We switched for two reasons. Firstly, in the previous solution, the implementation of the different versions to the endpoint was a little complicated. And secondly, the price. ESET is a more reasonably priced solution for us. 

I know that Cisco also has good endpoint products and it's something we would evaluate and consider. We'd like to see if it can be implemented in our company.

It's important to read all the documentation as it will make implementation easier.  

I rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

I install the solution in mobile devices to secure smartphones and to manage these devices as ESET has MDM, Mobile Device Management. I also use the product for data encryption.

I like the central console and the Cloud platform.

The solution has very useful MDM features. 

The solution is quite stable. It offers good performance.

The solution scales well if you need it to.

I found the installation process to be quite quick.

There are some new antivirus technologies that rely on AI, artificial intelligence. ESET does not have this technology right now. Maybe it's going to. It would be ideal if they followed the lead of other products and added AI into their service offering in the future. Adding AI would allow them to add extra security and to have more intelligent protection services.

I've recently installed the product. It's only been a few days. I've tried the product before and have worked with it on and off over the last 10 to 12 years or so.

The stability has been very good so far. It doesn't crash or freeze. I haven't noted any bugs or glitches. It's been good.

The product has the capability to scale. If a company needs to expand it, it should be able to do so without any issues.

I've only tried about ten devices so far, however. Therefore, I haven't really attempted to scale very much just yet. We have about 50 users on the solution right now. We do plan to increase usage in the future.

We don't have any experience with technical support. We've never used them. I can't speak to their level of knowledge or responsiveness.

We previously used Kaspersky.

The initial setup is not complex. It's pretty straightforward.

Overall, the deployment process is quick. It took a few minutes.

We have about three administrators that can handle any maintenance if it is required.

I handled the installation myself. I did not need a consultant or an integrator to assist me.

We do have to pay a license fee in order to use the solution. I can't speak to the exact costs.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we are using. I don't have the version number on-hand. As I installed it a few days ago, it's likely I have downloaded the latest version.

I'd recommend the solution to other organizations. For the most part, we've had a very positive experience.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

We use the tool to protect Microsoft 365. 

The tool offers great detection. You need time only to setup the environment. After that, it is just plug-and-play to get the solution up and running. We can also control the PC remotely from the cloud and get all the information in one place. 

The tool needs to explore security possibilities to secure iOS and Mac devices. 

I have been working with the tool for ten years. 

The tool is stable. 

The product is scalable. You can change the license model quickly. My company has 100 users for the product. 

The product's support responds within two hours once you write an email to them. The support of other alternative products takes around five days to respond. 

The product's standard configuration is straightforward. For the advanced version, you will need a lot of time to complete. You need one day for the basic setup and testing process. Another two days are needed for advanced setup due to security policies. You just need one person to handle the deployment process. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. You need to keep one administrator for the solution due to security reasons. You also need to test the product in your environment before start using it. 

I am using ESET Endpoint Security mainly for endpoint protection.

The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Security is that it is light on resources. It has a very low impact on the system. It uses low memory and the setup size is very low.

I have been using ESET Endpoint Security for approximately five years.

ESET Endpoint Security is highly stable.

I rate the stability of ESET Endpoint Security a five out of five.

The scalability of ESET Endpoint Security is good. If customers want to add more licensing, they can increase them.

We have approximately 45 people using the solution at all levels in my company.

I rate the scalability of ESET Endpoint Security a five out of five.

The support is good ESET Endpoint Security. My engineers on occasion find the information they need online.

I was previously using Seqrite. Our internal team has done POC for ESET Endpoint Security and found many positive points. It was for an international company and the migration was simple.

After we did the initial setup of ESET Endpoint Security, we had to inform users about popups. This solution comes with an in-built software firewall and there can be some popups coming. We must tell the user not to keep, allow, or block anything. That is the main issue on the user side we have faced. The user's experience may not be as good.

We did the implementation of ESET Endpoint Security which took approximately  10 minutes to complete per system with two engineers.

ESET Endpoint Security is valuable for the money spent because it is lightweight on the system. We don't need to upgrade existing systems or resources, such as CPUs and memory. If there is an older system, it can run efficiently or function as required.

The price of  ESET Endpoint Security is affordable.

I rate the price of ESET Endpoint Security a four out of five.

I recommend this solution to others.

I rate ESET Endpoint Security a nine out of ten.

ESET Endpoint Security can be used for a small non-enterprise company.

The features seem to be alright.

The solution's console management and deployment don't compare to Sophos. There is a general perception that ESET Endpoint Security is not an enterprise-grade product. The solution’s console management and scalability should be improved.

I have been using ESET Endpoint Security for many years. But it's not a product that we push actively. We will support if the customer has it, and I'll encourage the customer to move on from there. I personally would not encourage somebody to use this solution. If a customer uses it, I will do my best to convince them to go to Sophos suite.

The stability of the solution seems to be alright.

I don't think this solution is as scalable as Sophos or Check Point. I would rate the scalability of ESET Endpoint Security a six and a half out of ten. We have three customers working with ESET Endpoint Security. I am currently using one engineer for the deployment and maintenance of the solution.

I have never used ESET Endpoint Security’s customer support.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. But since our approach includes XDR, EDR, firewalls, and email encryption, Sophos works pretty well for us. The time taken to deploy the solution depends on the size of the customer at the end of the day. But the deployment is very quick, straightforward, and takes about an hour.

The deployment process is customer-dependent and product dependent. It will be around the portal, including the portal for the customer, licensing the portal, and then deploying the agents based on our deployment strategy.

Customers buy the ESET Endpoint Security license for a year, two years, or thirty six months.

Overall, I rate ESET Endpoint Security between six to seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for endpoint protection. It protects end-users and small companies as well.

It can keep PCs and devices secure. We can see if there are any issues from outside sources or emails that are a threat.

We have found we don't have many threats. We can look at the history and see which actions get declined. 

The price was very reasonable. 

It's light. I almost don't know that I am using it. The solution is stable. 

I can't speak to any missing features. 

It's not scalable in that you cannot use a license for multiple devices. 

We'd like the solution to make even more updates to ensure protection from the latest threats. 

I've been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. 

The solution is scalable in that you pay for a license per device. If you need more licenses, you just buy them. That way, you can expand your coverage as needed. 

However, you cannot use a license on multiple devices. 

We have five users on the solution so far. 

I've never used technical support. 

I did not previously use other solutions. 

The setup is easy. It was preinstalled on the computer. It took two minutes to put it as "active," and it would start working.

You do not need anyone to manage deployment and maintenance tasks. 

We have witnessed an ROI in terms of security. It saves money by having users avoid recovery costs when a device is attacked. 

The product pricing is very reasonable.

You need to pay for a license for every device.

We pay an annual fee to use the solution. 

I'm likely using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. 

The software is stable and runs without any issues and users can check the actions that are taken and detected. It's easy to use. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

We used ESET Endpoint Antivirus for the workstations to prevent Trojans, worms, and malware.

I liked that ESET Endpoint Antivirus was light, easy to install, and easy to integrate.

Online security could still be improved in ESET Endpoint Antivirus because security is threatened by phishing.

We used ESET Endpoint Antivirus for three years, but then we moved to a different solution. We used it in the previous year before we moved to Microsoft Defender.

ESET Endpoint Antivirus was easy to scale.

We didn't contact the ESET Endpoint Antivirus support team.

We didn't use a different solution previously, because we started with ESET Endpoint Antivirus.

The initial setup for ESET Endpoint Antivirus was straightforward. We installed it on many workstations.

We deployed ESET Endpoint Antivirus with our in-house team.

You need to pay for the ESET Endpoint Antivirus license monthly or yearly, whichever you choose.

We used the latest version of ESET Endpoint Antivirus.

We had one engineer who was responsible for the maintenance of the solution. We had fifteen users of the solution before we shifted to ESET Endpoint Protection Advanced.

I would recommend ESET Endpoint Antivirus to others, but currently, we're using Microsoft Defender.

I'm giving ESET Endpoint Antivirus a rating of seven.