Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo

Top 10 ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Alternatives

Vendor: ESET
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
2,520 followers
Post review

Top ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Cisco Secure Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, comprehensive device management, and user-friendly interfaces, ensuring robust cybersecurity solutions tailored to businesses of all sizes with exceptional reliability and support.

ESET Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ESET, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
ESET offers comprehensive endpoint protection with low resource impact, appealing to smaller businesses. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in AI-driven threat management, catering to large enterprises with advanced detection and cloud-native architecture for seamless, scalable security across environments.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a competitive setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon is noted for a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a competitive setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon is noted for a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is valued for its lightweight resource usage and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, justifying its higher price with extensive features and improved productivity.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers more budget-friendly setup options, making it a more economical choice for businesses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers more budget-friendly setup options, making it a more economical choice for businesses.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals to those seeking affordability and reliable support, excelling in malware detection and low system resource usage. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint's advanced threat intelligence and integration with other Cisco products justify its higher cost, benefiting large enterprises with detailed reporting.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, making it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, making it a more budget-friendly option.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
Both ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and SentinelOne Singularity Complete offer strong endpoint security solutions. ESET provides comprehensive malware protection with an affordable setup. In comparison, SentinelOne excels with advanced autonomous response and real-time forensics, making it ideal for users needing advanced functionalities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers effective malware protection and user-friendly management, making it cost-effective. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient features advanced threat protection and integrates with Fortinet's security suite, providing strong ROI despite higher setup costs. Choose ESET for simpler deployment, Fortinet for comprehensive features and support.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a slightly higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, emphasizing a contrast in initial investment requirements for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a slightly higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, emphasizing a contrast in initial investment requirements for deployment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in ease of use, deployment, and support, making it suitable for straightforward security needs. In comparison, Cortex XDR offers advanced threat detection and prevention, ideal for complex environments requiring superior threat intelligence and automation features, despite a steeper setup learning curve.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a more cost-effective setup option. ESET users reported a more complex installation process compared to the simpler setup of Cortex XDR.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a more cost-effective setup option. ESET users reported a more complex installation process compared to the simpler setup of Cortex XDR.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is praised for affordability, simple management, and minimal system impact. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security stands out for advanced threat protection and detailed reporting, justifying its higher cost for those requiring comprehensive features and proactive security measures. ESET's smooth deployment contrasts Symantec's complex configuration yet strong support.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a low setup cost and straightforward installation, while Symantec Endpoint Security has higher initial expenses and a more complex setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a low setup cost and straightforward installation, while Symantec Endpoint Security has higher initial expenses and a more complex setup process.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is favored for its ease of deployment, competitive pricing, and strong threat protection. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint’s advanced security features, such as anti-ransomware and machine learning, appeal to those needing superior protection despite higher costs and complexity.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Intercept X Endpoint, which offers a more budget-friendly setup solution.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Intercept X Endpoint, which offers a more budget-friendly setup solution.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in antivirus capabilities and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security impresses with advanced threat intelligence and integration. ESET has easier deployment, while Trend Vision One requires a larger initial investment but offers long-term benefits through extensive features.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is preferred for its affordability, simple deployment, and comprehensive threat detection. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security offers advanced threat analytics and automated responses, justifying its higher cost and complex configuration for those seeking top-tier security features.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform requires minimal setup costs while Trellix Endpoint Security demands a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform requires minimal setup costs while Trellix Endpoint Security demands a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive security, light footprint, and ease of use. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business excels in advanced threat detection and integration capabilities. ESET focuses on simplicity and efficiency, while Kaspersky provides extensive protection features worth the higher price.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business incurs higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business incurs higher initial costs.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust antivirus capabilities and ease of use, making it ideal for organizations with limited IT resources. In comparison, Tanium excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive IT management, catering to complex needs, with a higher return on investment for large-scale implementations.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Tanium Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers straightforward setup, while Tanium requires a more complex initial configuration. Tanium's higher setup cost contrasts with the streamlined and more affordable setup of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers straightforward setup, while Tanium requires a more complex initial configuration. Tanium's higher setup cost contrasts with the streamlined and more affordable setup of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers lower cost, comprehensive threat detection, and responsive customer service. In comparison, BigFix excels in powerful patch management and detailed reporting capabilities. ESET is easier to deploy, whereas BigFix provides more configuration options despite higher complexity.
Download BigFix vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost according to user reviews, whereas BigFix reviewers mention higher setup costs. This difference in initial investment is a key consideration for companies with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost according to user reviews, whereas BigFix reviewers mention higher setup costs. This difference in initial investment is a key consideration for companies with budget constraints.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust threat intelligence and competitive pricing. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in advanced threat prevention and zero-day protection, making it worth the higher investment. ESET is praised for straightforward deployment, while Check Point provides superior customer service.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform setup cost is often described as straightforward and affordable, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint is noted for being higher but justified by comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform setup cost is often described as straightforward and affordable, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint is noted for being higher but justified by comprehensive features.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive malware detection and user-friendly configuration, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and robust incident response, attracting those prioritizing superior security features despite higher costs.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive threat detection and strong anti-malware tools with lightweight system impact. In comparison, HP Wolf Security excels with isolation technology, running tasks in micro-VMs. ESET is ideal for broad security needs, while HP Wolf provides enhanced isolation.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. HP Wolf Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is known for its higher initial setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is known for its higher initial setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly setup.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is valued for strong malware detection and low system impact. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) provides advanced threat prevention and robust firewall capabilities. ESET is preferred for simple deployment, while Trellix's extensive features justify its higher cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has low setup costs, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) incurs higher setup costs. ESET is more budget-friendly for initial deployment compared to Trellix.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has low setup costs, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) incurs higher setup costs. ESET is more budget-friendly for initial deployment compared to Trellix.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in virus detection and low system impact, offering robust endpoint management and affordability. In comparison, Cynet's automated threat detection and advanced analytics provide comprehensive protection. Cynet's features justify its higher cost for those needing advanced security and AI-driven insights.
Download Cynet vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is lower compared to Cynet, which has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is lower compared to Cynet, which has a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.6 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is valued for advanced threat detection and low impact on performance. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business offers seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems. ESET appeals to those needing robust customization, while Microsoft Defender attracts users prioritizing cohesive security with existing Microsoft tools.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is praised for its low, upfront setup costs, whereas Microsoft Defender for Business requires higher setup expenses. ESET's affordability makes it more accessible compared to Microsoft's more substantial initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is praised for its low, upfront setup costs, whereas Microsoft Defender for Business requires higher setup expenses. ESET's affordability makes it more accessible compared to Microsoft's more substantial initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in pricing and support, appealing to cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Malwarebytes offers advanced threat detection and remediation features, making it suitable for enterprises needing robust security and ROI. ESET is preferred for affordability, while Malwarebytes is chosen for superior features.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Malwarebytes Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform users appreciate its affordable setup costs, while Malwarebytes users highlight its initial setup expenses as slightly higher but worth the investment. The distinct setup cost experiences set these solutions apart for potential buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform users appreciate its affordable setup costs, while Malwarebytes users highlight its initial setup expenses as slightly higher but worth the investment. The distinct setup cost experiences set these solutions apart for potential buyers.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust antivirus and low system impact, making it cost-effective and easy to deploy, with excellent customer service. In comparison, Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response promises advanced threat detection and remediation, justifying higher costs for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive, customizable security.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform setup cost is generally lower compared to Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, making ESET more cost-effective for initial deployment. Cybereason, however, might offer advanced features that justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform setup cost is generally lower compared to Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, making ESET more cost-effective for initial deployment. Cybereason, however, might offer advanced features that justify its higher setup cost.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals with its attractive pricing and strong customer support. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity stands out for its advanced AI-driven threat detection. A tech buyer might prioritize ESET for cost-effectiveness or BlackBerry Cylance for its cutting-edge capabilities.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a straightforward setup cost, while BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity requires a more complex setup investment. ESET’s cost-efficient approach contrasts with BlackBerry’s need for a higher initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a straightforward setup cost, while BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity requires a more complex setup investment. ESET’s cost-efficient approach contrasts with BlackBerry’s need for a higher initial expenditure.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers extensive feature sets, innovative malware detection, and strong ROI. In comparison, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform emphasizes reliable threat detection and superior antivirus capabilities. Panda excels in deployment ease, while ESET justifies higher costs with comprehensive security and dependable performance.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 often indicates a higher setup cost compared to ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, which users consider more cost-effective.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 often indicates a higher setup cost compared to ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, which users consider more cost-effective.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in threat detection and system efficiency, making it a strong choice for organizations prioritizing security performance. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security offers extensive features like asset management and advanced device control, appealing to those needing a broader range of functionalities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features straightforward setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a significant cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features straightforward setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a significant cost difference.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive protection and real-time monitoring, making it ideal for those seeking straightforward deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Deep Instinct Prevention Platform excels with advanced AI-driven threat detection and minimal false positives, suitable for those valuing superior technology and long-term benefits despite higher costs.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform requires a lower initial setup cost compared to the Deep Instinct Prevention Platform, which involves higher upfront fees.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform requires a lower initial setup cost compared to the Deep Instinct Prevention Platform, which involves higher upfront fees.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Norton Small Business
4.4 out of 5
ESET is favored for its pricing and straightforward deployment, enhanced by strong anti-malware features. In comparison, Norton Small Business, though pricier, offers a comprehensive feature set including strong identity protection and cloud backup, with superior customer service and perceived value justifying its cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Norton Small Business Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher setup cost, whereas Norton Small Business offers a more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher setup cost, whereas Norton Small Business offers a more affordable setup option.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
3.9 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive threat protection with advanced machine learning, excelling in robustness. In comparison, Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is praised for its fast scan times and efficiency. ESET provides extensive support, while Webroot's straightforward deployment appeals to those seeking simplicity.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is noted for its affordable setup costs, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is recognized for its competitive pricing that ensures value for small and medium businesses. ESET offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is noted for its affordable setup costs, while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is recognized for its competitive pricing that ensures value for small and medium businesses. ESET offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals for its strong malware detection, minimal system impact, and straightforward deployment, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers superior threat intelligence and centralized management, justifying its higher cost with advanced features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is relatively low, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost. ESET offers a cost-effective solution compared to Bitdefender's higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is relatively low, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost. ESET offers a cost-effective solution compared to Bitdefender's higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is appreciated for comprehensive threat detection and ease of managing devices. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client is praised for advanced threat protection and seamless integration. ESET emphasizes user-friendly management, while SonicWall focuses on advanced security protocols, justifying its higher cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust antivirus protection and responsive support, ideal for efficient deployment. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection excels in advanced threat intelligence and comprehensive security management. Users may prefer ESET for lower costs and reliable performance or WithSecure for advanced features despite higher expenses.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is known for a more complex installation process and higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is known for a more complex installation process and higher setup expenses.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager excels in endpoint management with competitive pricing and straightforward deployment. In comparison, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers superior malware detection with high ROI despite its complex setup. Tech buyers might choose Ivanti for cost-effectiveness or ESET for advanced security.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly setup costs of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly setup costs of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust malware protection and is cost-effective with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides advanced threat detection and detailed analytics. ESET meets budget-friendly needs, while Kaspersky caters to complex security requirements.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which typically involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which typically involves a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is noted for efficient malware detection and low system impact. In comparison, Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection excels with auto-containment technology and advanced threat prevention. ESET offers straightforward deployment, while Comodo can be challenging to configure but provides superior customer support once set up.
Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection requires a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection requires a higher setup investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is recognized for its user-friendly interface, effective malware detection, cost-effective pricing, and solid ROI. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites offers advanced threat protection and data loss prevention, making it ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive features and long-term value.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a cost-effective initial setup, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites involve a higher upfront expense. ESET's competitive pricing highlights its affordability compared to Trend Micro’s more premium offering.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a cost-effective initial setup, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites involve a higher upfront expense. ESET's competitive pricing highlights its affordability compared to Trend Micro’s more premium offering.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Xprotect
1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Xprotect
1 out of 5

As part of the ColorTokens Xtended ZeroTrustTM cloud-delivered, software-defined platform, ColorTokens Xprotect utilizes a proactive Zero Trust architecture to provide complete processlevel control for endpoints. In a Zero Trust architecture only good behavior is allowed and any deviations from normal behavior are automatically blocked. Xprotect is designed with intelligent algorithms for in-depth analysis of every running process and file present in the endpoint system. The running processes are analyzed with the known good processes and
combined with contextual behavioral analysis to detect and stop suspicious activity. Xprotect enables businesses to easily deploy and manage endpoint security from the cloud-hosted
console, providing real business value in minutes.

View comparison
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Kaspersky Total Security
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust support and favorable pricing, making it a cost-effective option desired for straight-forward security management. In comparison, Kaspersky Total Security excels in comprehensive features and advanced protection, appealing to those valuing extensive security tools and versatile functionalities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Kaspersky Total Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform's setup cost is generally described as moderate, while Kaspersky Total Security tends to have a higher initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform's setup cost is generally described as moderate, while Kaspersky Total Security tends to have a higher initial setup cost.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.5 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals with its affordability and robust support, ideal for enterprise environments needing quick deployment and ease of use. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels with superior advanced features and granular control, fitting enterprises prioritizing long-term ROI over initial cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has lower setup costs, while WatchGuard EPDR offers more affordable long-term pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has lower setup costs, while WatchGuard EPDR offers more affordable long-term pricing.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud
2.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is praised for its user-friendly interface and effective implementation and support, excelling in malware detection and comprehensive management. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud offers advanced control features and device compatibility, though users seek improvements in support and false positives.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has higher setup costs compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud, making ESET suitable for larger enterprises while Seqrite offers a more budget-friendly option for cost-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has higher setup costs compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud, making ESET suitable for larger enterprises while Seqrite offers a more budget-friendly option for cost-conscious businesses.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Anti-Malware Tools