Microsoft Dynamics AX product is an ERP solution. We provide this solution to three categories. One of them is the supply chain, one finance, and the other, retail commerce. We are implementing the supply chain through a simple warehouse model, which is finance-based. This includes the general ledger and other accounting functions. We are providing solutions for cash registers and E-commerce alongside other back-office solutions.
Business Application Group Manager at OBASE
Provides a lot of functionality
Pros and Cons
- "Dynamics AX provides a lot of functionality."
- "The product is standardised across industries so it is not a good fit for all types of sectors."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
We currently work with retail companies in Turkey. We have implemented the biggest retail company which are apparel companies and grocery companies. These companies sell 40 products, worldwide. There's a lot of change currently happening in the business. For example, there are lots of new features, new functionalities, and lots of new requests from the business side. Existing local solutions cannot handle this, or change it. All local companies and enterprise industries need new functionality to adapt to the market. Hence, there is a good business case to use Microsoft Dynamics AX. You can expand it with open-source code with the partners. This gives the customers options to extend and manage their business.
What is most valuable?
Customers want all the business flow to be contained within the application. If they're using a lot of Excel and other documents, in addition to working with several other third-party applications, the problem is that these applications cannot integrate. That's a huge problem for business. It's possible to provide a solution to this by using an interconnected ERP solution with Dynamics. It is possible to interconnect to other products such as SAP, Oracle, and other global ERP types. Microsoft Dynamics AX makes this possible. Dynamics AX provides a lot of functionality. You have all your information to hand in one application. The application provides these values into the accounting application, and the accounting application executes the rest of the workflow. It's completely integrated. This is a huge and flexible design for customers.
What needs improvement?
Flexibility with how it is used. For example, if you have a specific way of working, Dynamics AX may or may not accommodate that. Although it provides a whole solution you may have to adapt your working methods to suit the product, and not how you would like to work. Sometimes the data forms provided for specific retail applications are not adequate and do not provide enough functions as the product itself is not designed for the retail industry it is mainly designed for automotive companies and distribution companies although Microsoft tried to add a retail element into the system. The product is standardised across industries so it is not a good fit for all types of sectors.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Dynamics AX
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Dynamics AX. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been working with Microsoft using this solution for about 12 years. We are a gold partner in Turkey, and we've implemented this solution in Turkey. We have also implemented this solution in Sweden. We support the old versions. The first version we used is the AX 2009 but today we are implementing the latest versions. We prefer to implement the solution in the cloud, although for economic reasons, some customers require the on-premises solution.
How are customer service and support?
Premium support is good for the Microsoft aspect, but cloud support is not quite as good. They usually resolve issues very quickly, but sometimes do not provide key information when it is required by customers. This sometimes leads to clashes between partners and customers, as the partner is acting as first-line support.
How was the initial setup?
The time it takes is mainly due to industry type and customers expectations. Customers often make a big mistake during implementation by not providing business logic upfront when it is required. Once it is known they start to test the application to make sure it is suitable for the business logic. They are in a rush to implement ERP. Some management consulting services companies are ignored during the project implementation. We usually implement Microsoft Dynamics AX within two months. Ultimately, it depends on the customer's expectations, not how can we manage, or design the solution. This can cause a delay in implementation times, and project timelines are increased. For example, in retail, an implementation can take just 2 months or 2 years. Retail business company's logic can be different from each other. The implementation part is easy if you know your business logic but if you don't know, it can take between 1 to 3 years to implement.
What about the implementation team?
In Turkey, implementation has been difficult, as our customers are trying to reduce their IT personnel, and they want to push these services to the partners. This means the partners do not have experienced IT staff to liaise with on the implementations. The partners tend to use senior-level IT personnel working freelance, as it is not sustainable to pay the level of salaries they require permanently.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There are about 50 to 100 users, generally at each company. One of our customers has 200 stores. There's a lot of users when you calculate the number of users at each site. We negotiate licences with Microsoft. Microsoft provides a premium support agreement with partners. It's expensive for my country, Turkey. It's too expensive for customers to take this on themselves. As partners, we will buy this on behalf of the customers and then charge this value for each project.
What other advice do I have?
The solution is good. I would give Microsoft Dynamics AX 8 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Head of Controlling and IT at Melinda
Is flexible and helps with developing new functions
Pros and Cons
- "Flexibility is the best feature. Because we have the source code, we can develop our ideas. It enables us to develop new functions."
- "The on-premises and desktop versions are not user-friendly."
What is our primary use case?
We use Microsoft Dynamics AX to manage almost all our processes, beginning from finance to inventory.
What is most valuable?
Flexibility is the best feature. Because we have the source code, we can develop our ideas. It enables us to develop new functions.
What needs improvement?
The on-premises and desktop versions are not user-friendly.
The ability to automate certain processes could be added in the next release.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using it for more than 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I'd give scalability a rating of eight out of ten. We have more than 100 end users of this solution in our organization, including a few developers.
How was the initial setup?
The initial implementation was hard and not easy. It took almost a year to implement all of the processes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is not the cheapest solution, but it is also not the most expensive one. It's in between and is cheaper than SAP but more expensive than other local vendors. It is worth the cost.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend using Microsoft Dynamics AX particularly if you have a developer because you will be able to do a lot with it. Because of the flexibility, I would give this solution an overall rating of nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Dynamics AX
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Dynamics AX. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Director, Information Technology at a construction company with 501-1,000 employees
User-friendly with familiar UI but needs more presence in our region
Pros and Cons
- "It has the same UI and is very similar to any other Microsoft product."
- "Microsoft needs more presence in our region to help with management and maintenance."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for the basic functions which are required for finance and HR, and that's it.
What is most valuable?
It depends on how you deploy it and how you implement it, however, from a feature point of view, Dynamics is easy to use and very user-friendly. It has the same UI and is very similar to any other Microsoft product. Features-wise the navigation bar that they have makes it easy for exporting everything to Excel.
What needs improvement?
This is considered by Microsoft as an older product and unsupported. Microsoft is urging its clients to move to Dynamics 365, which is going to be coming into the pipeline. While it's a great product, we know that there is no support anymore for it.
The most important thing is to have compatibility with the business types. Microsoft is very rich and therefore it's possible for them to ensure it can apply to various areas.
Microsoft needs more presence in our region to help with management and maintenance.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for nine years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is mostly stable. It depends on your hardware sources much more than from an application point of view. It still requires much better infrastructure resources to be perfectly stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
You cannot scale it too much.
We have about 30 people using the solution currently.
How are customer service and support?
Microsoft doesn't support it even if you maintain the support fees on a yearly basis. It's at end-of-life. Users need to move to Dynamics 365.
How was the initial setup?
While the implementation took place before I came on board, my understanding is it takes around six to seven months to get implemented.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay a yearly licensing fee to Microsoft. Compared to the other ERPs, the pricing is reasonable.
What other advice do I have?
I'd advise new users to know first, what kind of business they are going to be, in or if that business needs to be running on top of Dynamics or not. If it's finance, then it's fine. If it's not finance, then they need to take something more industrious and geared towards a specific system.
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior IT Systems Engineer at ITL Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd
Reliable, beneficial material planning, but scalability could improve
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is material planning."
- "The older version of Microsoft Dynamics AX that we are using is not as scalable as the newer version."
What is our primary use case?
We are using Microsoft Dynamics AX for many areas, such as accounting, sales, distribution, production, operations, and inventory management.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is material planning.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Dynamics AX for approximately six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Microsoft Dynamics AX is stable.
I rate the stability of Microsoft Dynamics AX an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The older version of Microsoft Dynamics AX that we are using is not as scalable as the newer version.
We have approximately 30 to 50 users using this solution in my company.
What about the implementation team?
We required vendor support to implement the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of the solution could benefit from being less expensive.
I rate the price of Microsoft Dynamics AX a four out of five.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have not evaluated other solutions.
What other advice do I have?
This version of the solution I am using is at the end of its life.
I have been using Microsoft Dynamics AX seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
It's a great toolkit to drive efficiencies throughout your entire organization
Pros and Cons
- "AX is nearly a Tier One product, so implementations are long, but there's a lot of flexibility. Also, the ability to handle different issues found in larger organizations."
- "AX does take some time and maintenance."
Microsoft Dynamics AX is very strong in the manufacturing sector, as well as other verticals. It scales well and we've found several clients who were looking at Oracle, SAP, JD Edwards and so on who were well served at a very competitive price point (usually much less). One client was looking at a $5M SAP proposal and we got AX in just under $2M, and they were very happy with it as they have several sister companies that face $500K SAP upgrades/maintenance seemingly annually.
AX is nearly a Tier One product, so implementations are long, but there's a lot of flexibility. Also, the ability to handle different issues found in larger organizations.
There are several other MS Dynamics products for smaller companies. Our AX users were in the $200M to $400M annual revenue range. AX partners and resellers are a critical step. We found using a partner who specializes in their vertical is critical. We've also done a couple of AX rescues of clients that went with super-large practices where the consulting talent varies in skill. We tend to stick with boutique firms whose consultants we know and trust.
The cons: It's not really a con, but AX does take some time and maintenance. What you would expect with any large ERP product, it's not just a 'slam it in and you are done' project, but the type of technology you'd select if you were planning on continuous improvements and tying varying technologies together.
We had a combo contract manufacturing pharma outfit and it had some really good success in phase two of importing daily production reports from contract manufacturers that provided better visibility to finished goods, WIP, and raw materials inventory onsite at the contract manufacturers.
For a regional medical practice, we were able to link SQL tables from the practice management software to track data, such as 'which clinics were the docs practicing at on a certain day' without them having to do any actual data entry beyond what they were already documenting in patient records. This was nice.
If you're planning a major project upgrade and can take the time to put together a cost/revenue model showing AX breakeven, we generally project a break-even at less than 18 months. It's a great toolkit to drive efficiencies throughout the entire organization. If you're just looking to replace an outgrown ERP, it's probably a little big or you need a more advanced IT approach to really appreciate what you can do with AX.
There are also some good user groups and a growing development community. We understand the new Dynamics 365 Enterprise is using the AX code base and look forward to seeing that version mature in the months/years to come.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are a software selection and implementation firm - not affiliated with any software or ERP platform but have had several clients successfully implement AX in pharma manufacturing, healthcare regional practice, food & bev manufacturing and others.
AVP-Head,MIS Department at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The most valuable feature is the manufacturing module.
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature for us is the manufacturing module. It addresses our product costing for tuna canning."
- "The database requires a huge CPU and memory resources."
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature for us is the manufacturing module. It addresses our product costing for tuna canning.
How has it helped my organization?
It keeps product costing close to the actual cost of production. It also gives us better handling of the approval process (workflow system).
What needs improvement?
The database requires a huge CPU and memory resources.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using the solution since 2014.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We encountered an issue with stability. There was a problem on the workflow, which required escalation to Microsoft for resolution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We encountered an issue with scalability. Hardware requirements are quite large compared with other ERP solutions.
How are customer service and technical support?
I would give technical support a rating of 7/10.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
The previous ERP solution did not have a good local technical support facility. Escalation to the product proprietor was even worse.
How was the initial setup?
Like any other ERP system, the initial setup is straightforward:
- Business requirement analysis
- Business/office procedures
- Gathering of forms and reports
- System mapping
- Customization
- Testing
- Go-live
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
- Go for cloud implementation, if cost is critical.
- Know the solution provider's fiscal period, as you can get a better discount if the contract signing is near the end of the fiscal period.
- Identify your end-user role, as the license is based on user role/access.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated SAP and Oracle.
What other advice do I have?
Look for a solution that has multiple partners in your area (i.e., country). The system integrator should present a similar successful project implementation for reference.
Negotiate for implementation contingency (man-days). All business processes and procedures should be documented to ensure no surprises during and after implementation.
Handling change management is critical to the success of the project.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Account Executive at Lychee Integrated Solutions
Scalable product with efficient workflow management features
Pros and Cons
- "The product is easier to use and has more efficient workflow management features than other vendors."
- "The user interface could be better."
What is our primary use case?
We use Microsoft Dynamics AX for accounting, manufacturing, and hybrid deployment purposes.
What is most valuable?
The product is easier to use and has more efficient workflow management features than other vendors. It helps to respond to customer queries as well.
What needs improvement?
The product could be more accessible for small and medium-sized businesses. The license renewal cost is on the higher side. It could be improved as well. Additionally, the user interface could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Microsoft Dynamics AX for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is relatively stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is scalable. We have around 25 Microsoft Dynamics AX users in our organization. The companies we manage also have a significant number of end users.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support services could be faster.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is neither easy nor difficult. It is very technical and has average complexity. It takes around three weeks to complete, depending on the stability. Usually, one executive can deploy the product. However, in the case of implementation on cloud servers and financial processing, it requires three to five executives. For maintenance, it requires two executives.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product's license renewal cost could be better.
What other advice do I have?
I advise others to purchase the product depending on the use cases for their business. I rate it an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Chief Operating Officer at ERBrains IT Solutions Pvt Ltd
Helps with the supply chain management, operations and finance
Pros and Cons
- "I am impressed with the tool's vendor collaboration. It is also easy to connect with third-party applications."
- "The product needs improvement in procurement planning. It also needs to include a production scheduling feature."
What is our primary use case?
We use the product for the entire supply chain management that includes procurement, inventory, warehouse management, manufacturing, service management, and finance.
What is most valuable?
I am impressed with the tool's vendor collaboration. It is also easy to connect with third-party applications.
What needs improvement?
The product needs improvement in procurement planning. It also needs to include a production scheduling feature.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The cloud version is scalable and not the on-prem version. My company has 70 users for the product.
How was the initial setup?
We use the product's SaaS-based version. The solution's setup is complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product's pricing is expensive. The tool costs 210 USD per user for one month.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate the product a seven out of ten. The tool is quite a complex system if you are moving from a paper-based process to a system-based one.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Dynamics AX Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Popular Comparisons
SAP S/4HANA
PeopleSoft
Oracle E-Business Suite
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
SAP Business One
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
IFS Cloud Platform
Epicor ERP
Microsoft Dynamics GP
BST Global ERP
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Dynamics AX Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- SAP ERP or Dynamics AX?
- Dynamics AX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
- Microsoft Dynamics AXL How satisfied are you with the solution?
- Comparing ERPs: SAP vs Oracle vs Microsoft
- When evaluating ERP, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Which is the best ERP for a mid-sized AEC company?
- Infor ERP SyteLine or SAP Business All-in-One?
- What would be your most recommended cloud-based ERP system for a medium-sized enterprise?
- Dynamics AX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
- SAP S/4 HANA vs Infor Lawson M3