We primarily use this solution for retail purposes, including finance, inventory, and warehouse management.
We are using Microsoft Dynamics AX R3. This solution is deployed on-prem.
We primarily use this solution for retail purposes, including finance, inventory, and warehouse management.
We are using Microsoft Dynamics AX R3. This solution is deployed on-prem.
A valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is that it is stable.
This solution could be improved with more expert resources and an easier implementation process.
I have been using Microsoft Dynamics AX for five years.
This solution is stable.
This solution is scalable.
We have approximately 1,200 users of this solution in our organization.
The installation process, particularly for on-prem deployment, is not easy. For installation, I believe that the cloud is better than the on-prem deployment. We have an on-prem environment, but we are facing many issues.
Our company pays for licensing yearly.
I rate this solution a nine out of ten because the implementation was complex. I would recommend this solution to others, as long as they have the money for it.
We use this product for finance applications.
The good thing about this solution is that it is easy to use. If anyone is familiar with Microsoft products then they can handle it easily.
The manuals are available for learning about the functionality.
There should be the capability for users to enhance the application by using a low-code or no-code product from the Microsoft family.
Scaling is complex and is something that can be improved.
In the future, I would like to see more applications.
I have been using Microsoft Dynamics AX for approximately seven years.
The core of the product is stable but for additional features, stability depends on the partner.
It is not very easy to scale because you have to deal with the partner at the time. You need to spend some effort in order to scale.
I have not been in touch with technical support because I'm not dealing with any issues.
The initial setup is straightforward, but of course, you have to add a lot of features on your own because it will not provide everything.
The suitability of this product depends on your business environment and industry.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Annual ROI = 7%
The finance and finance reporting features are good. The ability to use it with Excel means you can get the reports you need.
I would like to see improvements in manufacturing. We had a meeting with the person in charge of manufacturing last year in which I took six pages of notes regarding MRP/materials requirements planning. The implication was that the system can handle what we needed it do, but the person is charge of manufacturing is quite busy. I did not hear back after sending the notes, and I never helped implement it.
I do not think we have implemented it, and I think we still do it outside the system.
Some of the companies owned by the same parent company cannot implement this solution due to constraints on manufacturing.
It was a busy day when I toured the facility, and I had little time to discuss this solution. I just gathered that they could not make it fit for them.
We have used this solution for a year.
We encountered stability issues.
The installation was complex. There are many settings to configure.
We previously used SAP.
First evaluate if to see if it meets your manufacturing needs. In many settings, it does not.
I've used it for seven years.
There were some issues.
No issues encountered.
No issues encountered.
It needs improvement.
Technical Support:It needs improvement.
I was using Dynamics NAV, and we switched to AX due to limitations in Dynamics NAV.
It's complex, in terms of data migration, but the latest version has improved a lot on this front.
We did it in-house with involvement from a vendor team.
The pricing model does not really fit all customers that I offer consulting too.
The product required extensive functional expertise for a successful implementation on all the areas, failed implementations of Dynamics AX has always lacked functional exposure
Master planning is the most valuable feature.
Moving our production process from forecasting only to a master plan, including demand forecast and supply forecast wish, is great progress.
I have been using it for one year and it works perfectly.
In the beginning of our project phases, we faced a lot of issues related to collecting the master data but after that, every thing goes smoothly.
We have not encountered any stability issues related to the database; just some connection issues due to VPN connection stability.
We have not encountered any scalability issues yet.
Customer service needed more improvement.
Technical Support:For all of the issues we faced, we found solutions in TechNet and handouts.
We previously used MS Dynamics GP. Production and master planning is better in Dynamics AX.
We are using the solution for a small organization.
One of the valuable features of the solution is how easy it is to use.
The integration could improve for the future.
I have been using the solution for approximately 10 years.
In my experience, the solution has been stable.
I have approximately 50 people using the solution in my organization.
The technical support is satisfactory.
We have a couple of technicians that do the deployment.
I will continue to use the solution in the future and I recommend it to others.
I rate Microsoft Dynamics AX a nine out of ten.
We have implemented it for retail companies (e.g., fashion, toys, etc.). We have also implemented the same solution for FMCG and supermarket business models.
All its features are valuable.
It needs better financials and reporting from the system, not through Excel.
We're seeing a lot of AX clients bring on Host Analytics, Adaptive Insights or more recently, Anaplan for advanced reporting, closing and reconciliation, FP&A and the like. We're also seeing traction from Workiva for SEC reporting - in the past I was used to seeing clients go with BI tools to do the advanced reporting but it seems to have shifted of late.
I had some clients go through the same issue - the AX manufacturing is generally good and we have some pharma mfgs doing process manufacturing and others doing discreet mfg - but AX is a LOT of work to configure and it takes a lot of consulting dollars.
So the issue is simply getting to the mfg implementation - I had one client that took 2 years before they brought everything up.
People are attracted to AX because it's so much less expensive than SAP or Oracle, but it's still a Tier One system - or very close to it.
So the best practice is to do the ROI study and come up with how it's going to make mfg less labor intensive - or whatever - and when the entire company sees the return, they will finally get behind the project and move forward.