Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo

Top 10 Trend Micro Smart Protection Alternatives

Vendor: Trend Micro
4.0 out of 5
295 followers
Post review

Top Trend Micro Smart Protection Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trend Micro Smart Protection based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Trend Micro Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Trend Micro, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with real-time threat intelligence and cloud-based architecture for quick threat responses. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection offers robust endpoint protection and efficient malware detection. CrowdStrike Falcon is highly valued for speed and real-time updates. Trend Micro has extensive features and competitive pricing.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, which offers a more affordable implementation fee.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, which offers a more affordable implementation fee.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection offers comprehensive threat detection with straightforward deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in integration with Microsoft 365 and advanced threat analytics, making it worth the higher cost despite its complex initial setup.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trend Micro Smart Protection incurs a lower initial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost reflecting its extensive features.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Smart Protection incurs a lower initial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost reflecting its extensive features.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete's advanced automation appeals to users seeking streamlined protection, whereas Trend Micro Smart Protection's extensive threat detection attracts those prioritizing comprehensive security. In comparison, SentinelOne's quick deployment contrasts with Trend Micro's complex setup requirements, catering to different operational needs and preferences.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection. Trend Micro Smart Protection offers a more affordable initial setup, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection. Trend Micro Smart Protection offers a more affordable initial setup, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection offers comprehensive threat intelligence and real-time protection. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient provides advanced firewall and VPN capabilities. Trend Micro Smart Protection is known for competitive pricing, while Fortinet FortiClient's extensive features justify its higher cost.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trend Micro Smart Protection has a higher setup cost, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is more budget-friendly with lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Smart Protection has a higher setup cost, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is more budget-friendly with lower initial expenses.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection excels in affordability and cost-effective ROI. In comparison, Cortex XDR impresses with advanced threat detection and endpoint security integration. Trend Micro offers straightforward deployment and robust customer service, whereas Cortex XDR excels in comprehensive analytics and superior threat detection.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trend Micro Smart Protection has a high setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides a more affordable setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Smart Protection has a high setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides a more affordable setup cost.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security excels in robust data protection and threat detection, making it suitable for those prioritizing comprehensive coverage and data loss prevention. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection offers advanced machine learning and cloud security, appealing to tech buyers seeking proactive threat prevention and cost-effective solutions.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is higher, whereas Trend Micro Smart Protection offers a more budget-friendly option. Trend Micro's setup process is often described as straightforward, while Symantec is noted for its comprehensive installation steps.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security's setup cost is higher, whereas Trend Micro Smart Protection offers a more budget-friendly option. Trend Micro's setup process is often described as straightforward, while Symantec is noted for its comprehensive installation steps.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection excels in support and pricing. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint is favored for its robust features. Trend Micro Smart Protection is easier to deploy with excellent service; in contrast, Intercept X Endpoint offers more advanced threat protection and better long-term ROI.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trend Micro Smart Protection has a lower setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint tends to be pricier but includes more advanced features for security.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Smart Protection has a lower setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint tends to be pricier but includes more advanced features for security.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is favored for ease of deployment and pricing while Trend Micro Smart Protection is noted for advanced features. Trellix provides comprehensive threat protection; in comparison, Trend Micro offers superior malware detection. Both have room for improvement but differ in functionalities and pricing.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, with Trend Micro being generally more expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, with Trend Micro being generally more expensive.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers strong threat detection and encryption, making it a budget-friendly choice. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection excels with cloud-based security and AI-driven threat intelligence, providing better long-term value. Kaspersky's integration improvement needs contrast with Trend Micro's documentation enhancement requirements.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a higher setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium provides comprehensive security and endpoint management with high customer service ratings, while Trend Micro Smart Protection focuses more on advanced malware detection and threat intelligence. In comparison, Trend Micro offers simpler deployment and better ease of use, though both offer strong support and solid ROI.
Download Tanium vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Tanium has a complex initial setup cost, while Trend Micro Smart Protection offers a more straightforward, budget-friendly setup option. Tanium is often seen as requiring a higher investment compared to the relatively lower initial costs of Trend Micro Smart Protection.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a complex initial setup cost, while Trend Micro Smart Protection offers a more straightforward, budget-friendly setup option. Tanium is often seen as requiring a higher investment compared to the relatively lower initial costs of Trend Micro Smart Protection.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is favored for its robust threat prevention and endpoint visibility, making it cost-effective. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection stands out with advanced threat detection and integrated data loss prevention, providing superior long-term ROI despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is noted for being straightforward and affordable, while Trend Micro Smart Protection's setup cost is often seen as higher but justified by its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is noted for being straightforward and affordable, while Trend Micro Smart Protection's setup cost is often seen as higher but justified by its advanced features.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security offers user-friendly threat isolation and secure browsing, ideal for efficiency. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection excels in advanced threat detection and multi-layered protection. Tech buyers choose HP Wolf for easy deployment and Trend Micro for its comprehensive feature set and strong ROI.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
HP Wolf Security incurs lower setup costs than Trend Micro Smart Protection, but Trend Micro offers a broader range of features.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security incurs lower setup costs than Trend Micro Smart Protection, but Trend Micro offers a broader range of features.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet excels in automated threat detection and response, praised for its straightforward deployment and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Trend Micro Smart Protection offers extensive malware protection and comprehensive threat intelligence. Trend Micro Smart Protection prioritizes feature-rich offerings, despite more complex setup and higher costs.
Download Cynet vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Users report that Cynet setup costs are significantly lower, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious installations, while Trend Micro Smart Protection's higher setup costs are justified by its advanced feature set and robust performance.
View comparison
Pricing
Users report that Cynet setup costs are significantly lower, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious installations, while Trend Micro Smart Protection's higher setup costs are justified by its advanced feature set and robust performance.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.6 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection offers robust threat detection and real-time protection, appealing to tech buyers seeking simple deployment and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business excels with advanced integration and comprehensive features but demands higher investment and faces challenges in setup complexity.
Download Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trend Micro Smart Protection is praised for its low setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Business users report moderate setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Smart Protection is praised for its low setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Business users report moderate setup expenses.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection excels with its comprehensive threat intelligence, robust malware protection, and minimal system impact. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security's advanced threat detection and real-time protection stand out. Trend Micro offers better customer support, while Seqrite's cost-effective pricing attracts budget-conscious users.
Download Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trend Micro Smart Protection has a slightly higher setup cost compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Smart Protection has a slightly higher setup cost compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Micro Smart Protection excels in affordability, robust threat detection, and customer support. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced machine learning, behavioral analysis, and versatile deployment. Trend Micro is ideal for those focused on cost-effectiveness, while Bitdefender appeals to those requiring sophisticated, comprehensive security features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trend Micro Smart Protection presents a higher initial setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective setup solution. Trend Micro includes more advanced features, while Bitdefender focuses on affordability without compromising essential functi...
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Micro Smart Protection presents a higher initial setup cost, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers a more cost-effective setup solution. Trend Micro includes more advanced features, while Bitdefender focuses on affordability without compromising essential functi...

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Identity Management (IM)