Workspace ONE UEM Reviews

We are using VMware Workspace ONE for Mobility management.

The solution's single plane of glass approach is beneficial. The endpoint management is very good and specific. One of their competitors is Intune, and you have leaks from other services within the Microsoft ecosystem.

I have been using VMware Workspace ONE for approximately three months.

The scalability is good.

VMware Workspace ONE is scalable.

The support was good.

I have used Microsoft Intune.

We had no problems setting up the solution.

VMware Workspace ONE is expensive.

Based on our environment, VMware Workspace ONE was easy enough to use in some cases. In other cases, there were some challenges.

I rate VMware Workspace ONE a six out of ten.

We use it for managing mobiles at a very elementary level. Basically, we want to control mobiles and allow a limited number of apps.

It is like any other mobile solution. It gives us the ability to control remotely, and that is what we like. We can wipe out and deploy remotely.

They do have a good integration, but there is a long way to go as far as integration is concerned. They need to integrate with the cloud solutions a little bit more. We are looking for Azure integration.

I have been using this solution for a year at the most.

It is stable. There are no stability issues.

It scales well. Everybody in our organization is using it.

They are perfect. They are available whenever we need them.

We didn't use any other solution previously.

It was simple.

Its pricing was okay for our company.

I don't have any experience with other similar solutions, so I can't compare it with others. We decided to go with it and stick with it. It served the purpose in my previous organization. It is also serving the purpose in this organization. It is pretty good. VMware is one of the leaders.

I would rate VMware Workspace ONE a nine out of ten.

We use this solution simply for the management of iPads.

The remote management and location capabilities are good. We don't use the Find My iPhone app, so this has helped a lot.

The app installer is something that they should really change. It creates a lot of confusion for the user. The app installer will notify you when an update is available, but it doesn't tell you what's going to be installed. So if you tell the user to update, they won't do it because if they look at the app installer, they're going to see that they have the latest version.

They also need a different UI for the app installer.

I have been using this solution for three to four years.

It's stable. Every now and then you have some hiccups, but overall, it's a stable product. In regards to stability, I would give it an eight out of ten.

It really depends on the issue that you have. Some support members can really answer the questions, and some of them seem really lost regarding what to do; then you get escalated from one department to another, so it really depends on what's going on.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give VMware Workspace ONE a rating of eight.

We use it for managing BYOD devices and also for government-furnished devices - we support the Department of Energy. We use it for about 1500 devices.

It makes us more efficient in managing these devices, in lieu of not having it, that's for sure. We can also impose cybersecurity requirements.

For the most part it works, that's valuable to us. 

We're unhappy with the quality of support we get for it. We're unhappy with how upgrades occur, so we are migrating away from it. We have an on-premise AirWatch solution and for us to do upgrades we have to call AirWatch to be able to perform the upgrades. They're busy, and scheduling it is not timely enough for us.

There are features that we want like the ability to use Derived Credentials and things like that, which we can do with AirWatch, but doing so we move up into a different tier of licensing and the cost increases dramatically. To get the features we want, we can do the same thing with Microsoft Intune and we're going to see a product savings of over $70,000 a year.

• Mobile provisioning
• Security
• Some mobile application provisioning

It lets us see whether users have rooted their phones, and set standards before letting phones on our network. It has minimal OS levels, and provides the abilities to enforce security.

• Application-level support
• Per-app VPN coming together

It hasn’t always been good, but getting better. We do quasi-hosted situations, so getting it to the right level took a while.

I don't have the visibility of this.

We haven't had to use it.

I wasn't involved in the setup.

We chose Airwatch because it has a good setup, is easy to administer, and the POC was good.

I would recommend it, as it's very stable and robust. Make sure you stay current with it, and up to date.

We use this solution for our client, a university. We use it in the lab for the students.

The solution is easy to deploy. It's got a straightforward implementation that isn't hard to execute.

The product offers very good performance. 

We're able to use HTML for the web connection, which is quite helpful.

The solution has proven to be very stable.

We find the solution is rather scalable.

It would be very helpful if we could integrate it directly into the database.

It's a costly product. It would help if they could offer it at a discount.

It would be ideal if the solution could enhance the user interface and make a modern dashboard.

I've been using the solution for just one year. Previously, we used Horizon 7. I haven't been using this solution for very long.

The solution is stable. It doesn't have bugs or glitches that affect its performance. It doesn't crash or freeze at all. It's pretty reliable.

The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it should be able to do so without issue.

Technical support for this solution is very good. They are knowledgeable and responsive. We're pretty happy with them so far and have been satisfied with the level of service we receive.

The solution is not too complex to set up. We found the implementation fairly easy.

The solution is quite expansive.

We're a VMware partner.

Overall, I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It's quite good, however, it's also quite expensive.

We use it against security breaches. We have a lot of corporate information, which is highly confidential. We don't want that information to be leaked. We have AirWatch to avoid allowing everybody access to all the information and using it. Once an employee's device is enrolled, everything is under security, so there won't be any opportunities for security breaches.

We are sending emails from one person to another person in the same domain. This falls under security. We need there to be no security breaches, when we are sending emails which are confidential. There can be no points of leakage. If an outside person tries to track or hack information, it is not possible without us being notified.

1. Application management: Apply application to users via a catalog or app store.
2. Content management: Attachments, documents, PDFs, etc. and emails should be encrypted.
3. Device management: Basic troubleshooting.
4. Email management: Avoid email hacks.

The console comes bunched together as a package and inbuilt. Its called Workspace ONE. Whenever we have an issue, we contact the service provider, and instead of a fix, we are just getting the next version of Workspace ONE.

It is stable.

I use this solution as a single sign-on, and I can join other domains in my environment. You can also get permission from the users to access something from my desktop or portable.

The most valuable feature is that it will use my credentials to access various parts of the infrastructure or other solutions, such as vRealize.

If some kind of disaster happens then it is possible to restore the identity manager database from a backup.

I would like to integrate this solution with VRE and VDI. They can now be installed, but they operate as separate components.

Many of the features that exist in Active Directory do not exist in Identity Manager, which means that people depend on Active Directory.

This is a scalable solution. We can have dual or multiple identity managers and replicate data between them.

The technical support is good and we have had no problem with them.

The initial setup of this solution is straightforward.

This is a solution that I recommend.

For the purpose that this solution is designed for it works great, but it doesn't compare well with other solutions.

I would rate this solution a five out of ten.