Zephyr Enterprise Reviews

I use it for test management within Jira.

This tool boasts an incredibly user-friendly interface that integrates seamlessly with other Jira tools. I particularly appreciate its intuitive features for designing test plans, creating test cases, and executing test cycles.

It's mostly used for sales and customer verification. We gather customer information and verify that it's a real person.

Security is always a top priority in the IT business. We would like to see improvements in the security measures to ensure that customer information is protected.

We use the solution for test case management.

The solution does its job well. It doesn't have many errors.

We have been working with DFS for almost six or seven years. We have a lot of automation in our own framework, and DFS is supporting that framework. We have integrated DFS with our automation framework.

We moved to JIRA because of the cost. We needed a test management solution, and we are in the process of finalizing Zephyr for that. The management is yet to decide whether we move to Zephyr or continue with DFS. We are still using DFS for most of our projects. For some of the projects, we are using Zephyr. We are using continuous integration while doing the deployment to Bamboo.

It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications.

We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management.

It's very simple to use, which is beneficial. 

It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money.

The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there. Those are most likely the two major areas.

We use Zephyr Enterprise for the entire testing process from beginning to end.

Zephyr Enterprise has improved how our organization functions. In the guide itself, they give us different kinds of processes that can be implemented. There is the mature process, the initiated process, and the over the structure process.

The guidance is already there and the process depends on the organization's needs. With a mature process, you can get a lot of test metrics out of it. I would say our organization wanted the highest maturity process.

We use the solution for test case management. 

Zephyr Enterprise needs to redesign the reporting. 

Test repository is our primary usage. It was working fine, especially with the waterfall approach. With waterfall products, it worked but now we are transitioning to an agile model. This is where we are having challenges, and one of the reasons that we are looking for a different tool.

Earlier test artifacts used to be maintained either in a shared drive or somewhere in Excel spreadsheet. Now, we are getting consolidated reports in one place. We have all our metrics and repository together, and this is helpful.