HCL Domino vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

"The most valuable feature of HCL Domino is how robust it is."

"The most important benefit is security. The security architecture is very good. It's the best part of the solution."

"HCL Domino is an application development and collaboration platform with strong stability and security. Deployment of this platform is easy and takes only 10 minutes."

"The DAOS feature is the most valuable. It helps to save some of my storage."

"HCL Domino is the best product from a security point of view."

"The email system is the most valuable feature."

"It serves as a centralized solution that fulfills all my requirements from operating my email server to managing various aspects of my operations."

"For workflow applications or general applications, the rapid development capability is what we value most."

"Network NG Modules are valuable to us."

"The stability is good and keeps getting better with each new update."

"The configuration is simple."

"A lot of other products like Microsoft Exchange offer email or collaboration features, but they are not as fast as Zimbra."

"Zimbra Collaboration has a good web interface."

"One of the most valuable features involves the solution's automatic backup, which I find to be pretty simple and straightforward, and obviates the need for additional software."

"The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is the cost."

"The backup and storage management features of Zimbra Collaboration are valuable."

"From the Domino side, it should support DKIM and DMARC."

"HCL Domino could improve by having integration with other solutions, such as Microsoft 365."

"Designing a new template could provide a refreshed visual experience for users without significant changes to the underlying functionality."

"They should provide its integration with other AI applications."

"The speed of the Notes client is an area that could be improved."

"HCL Domino needs to be more user-friendly."

"Many people are not very happy with its speed."

"When you compare with Microsoft Exchange, the UI could be more user-friendly."

"In the next release, Zimbra Collaboration should include a security feature to allow access for mobile device administrators."

"Zimbra Collaboration's video conferencing could be improved."

"It does have a few bugs."

"The solution’s forums don't have much information or documentation on administration tasks."

"We have had an issue with security."

"I would like to see a Microsoft schedule function added."

"The tool should improve its multi-cloud feature."

"Zimbra must improve its solution to make it easy so that the users don't have to use webmail to connect to their accounts and log in to webmail every time. This is something that is lacking in Zimbra Collaboration. They should provide a better way to easily connect email applications on the desktop to the Zimbra server. They should also try to have more functionality for storage management, like Microsoft Exchange. Currently, the management of the email data must be done manually in Zimbra Collaboration, which we are finding very difficult. They should provide a way to save emails so that you can have more space on the server and storage. Because of the lack of this functionality, we are planning to migrate to Microsoft Exchange. Microsoft Exchange provides a better way to manage storage than Zimbra Collaboration. You cannot have a mail solution without storage management because emails will always increase. Zimbra Collaboration also needs tools for management. More back-office tools are required to manage the whole mailbox and space. You don't only manage emails but also the documents attached to the emails. Therefore, you require tools to select and decide what do you want to save or how do you want to free up space in your infrastructure."

"My company's customers need to make monthly or yearly payments towards the license charges of the product."

"HCL Domino is costly, but it still depends on how your organization views it price-wise."

"While I don't have precise pricing information at hand, my understanding is that it tends to be on the higher end."

"We're happy with the price of our license — it's pretty standard."

"We pay annually for the use of this solution and it is only a standard fee."

"For 30 licenses, we pay $1,500 every year. It is not an expensive product."

"We chose to pay for our licensing fees annually."

"The license for Domino is yearly. The price is high."

"The solution is not expensive compared to other products."

"We do not pay for licenses to use this solution."

"The solution is competitively priced."

"I use Zimbra Collaboration's community version. We may move to the enterprise version since prices are affordable."

"When it comes to the licensing of Zimbra Collaboration, my license covers the servers and I find its terms to be much simpler than those of Microsoft Exchange."

"Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate."

"If you choose the network edition, it is a little pricier. They have the open-source edition too which is only community supported."

"Zimbra Collaboration offers a good price-to-feature ratio."