We performed a comparison between Marketo and Oracle Eloqua based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Marketing Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The smart campaign looks quite interesting and useful."
"The main highlights of Marketo are its support structure, the documentation available, and the features mainly related to forms, landing pages, and leads. Although other platforms like Oracle Eloqua have similar features, Marketo's support structure, lead generation, and segmentation features are easier than those of different platforms."
"The most valuable features are the Marketo emails, both sending and tracking."
"The product has been stable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is Smart Campaigns."
"One of the most important things about Marketo is its focus on GDPR compliance. It helps you follow GDPR and CAN-SPAM rules. For example, with Marketo, I won't accidentally target audiences without their consent. Firstly, the Marketo Insights system will highlight new customer segments that I should engage with."
"One feature I like is the user interface. Compared to other tools I've used, it's much more friendly and easy to navigate. Additionally, it offers a wide range of features, which makes tasks like segmenting data much simpler."
"The main feature of Marketo is sending out emails, so that would be the most valuable feature."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"Lead scoring has helped with the process of qualifying leads."
"It provides good support for really large databases."
"The ease of maintenance is the most valuable feature."
"The solution's engine framework is quite simple, giving you the agility you need in the business."
"I like the insight part, where we can pull the reports. Oracle Eloqua can generate reports on the activities that customers take or that we do. That is one interesting part that I enjoy working with."
"It is a user-friendly product."
"I've used other marketing automation tools, like Marketo, that require more technical knowledge. Eloqua is straightforward and user-friendly."
"Adobe, the parent company, needs to improve on getting more information published to allow users to educate themselves on how to use the solution."
"The user experience needs improvement, particularly in terms of ease of use and navigation between projects."
"I had an issue while integrating JavaScript with forms. When you embed JavaScript, you can either embed it in a landing page or some other self-contained management system like WordPress. Currently, it provides you access to CSS, where you can customize your form design, but there is no option for JavaScript modification for a particular form. This area needs to be improved where you can integrate JavaScript, and it has the JavaScript functions for that particular form. There are a lot of other areas of improvement. In the design area, they can give us more testing options instead of relying on email testing alone. It would be great if they can provide responsive testing where email clients can be tested within Marketo. It would be also helpful if they can implement some in-built options for users or forms for blocking a generic email ID such as Yahoo or Gmail. Similarly, it would be helpful to have JavaScript features and forms as well as the option to add Google analytics and a header and footer for the landing pages."
"I have encountered issues when I had to use filters repeatedly. It would have been helpful if I could duplicate them directly, instead of dragging them. Also, having an option to save filters for future use would have saved a lot of time, especially when dealing with multiple filters."
"One limitation is the user limit. For bigger organizations with large audience sizes exceeding, let's say, 500k, the solution may not be as efficient as larger enterprise platforms like Salesforce or Oracle Eloqua. However, Marketo is one of the best platforms for mid-scale and small-scale organisations."
"Its APIs need to be more flexible because there are some things that are not available in the API."
"Marketo should give more power to the users for data manipulation."
"Revenue management, attribution, and ABM can all be improved."
"The solution could improve by having a more user-friendly interface."
"Eloqua doesn't have built-in features for WhatsApp marketing or SMS functionality."
"The solution does not have a good database architecture."
"There are some things where improvement is needed. For me, it would be great if they integrated a tool like AI configuration capabilities within Eloqua itself."
"The solution should consider adding functionality related to event listening, such as webhooks."
"Reporting is very clunky and not user friendly."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"The product's initial setup process could be better."
Marketo is ranked 4th in Marketing Automation with 20 reviews while Oracle Eloqua is ranked 3rd in Marketing Automation with 35 reviews. Marketo is rated 8.4, while Oracle Eloqua is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Marketo writes "Useful for lead capture and engagement across social media platforms". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Eloqua writes "A well-known and flexible solution that provides a lot of features for B2B email marketing". Marketo is most compared with Salesforce Marketing Cloud, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Pardot, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Teradata Customer Interaction Manager, whereas Oracle Eloqua is most compared with Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Pardot, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle CRM and Zift Solutions. See our Marketo vs. Oracle Eloqua report.
See our list of best Marketing Automation vendors.
We monitor all Marketing Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.