Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle CRM vs Oracle Fusion Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle CRM
Ranking in CRM
9th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Marketing Automation (5th)
Oracle Fusion Service
Ranking in CRM
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
CRM Customer Engagement Centers (3rd), Marketing Management (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Oracle CRM is 3.1%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Fusion Service is 1.1%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

Omair Bokhari - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps business track their customers, sales leads, and opportunities
An area for improvement is the vendors' inability to understand the customers' requirements and communicate them to Oracle. When we started to implement the tool, and during the very initial phases of the product, when Oracle launched it, our company opted for it. We faced a few challenges related to the product speed associated with some functionalities that were not available when the tool was just launched, but later on, it became available, and right now, we are actually using it. The tool is fulfilling our requirements. There were no major hiccups or challenges due to the tool. The solution's mobile app needs to be enriched with more functionalities in the future.
MahaboobPasha - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration enhances efficiency with good ERP Fusion Console that helps with centralization
When it comes to ERP Cloud, performance has always been an issue, especially when calling an API or a VIP publisher. I experience timeouts, which Oracle needs to improve. There have been many service requests around this, particularly last year. Although progress has been made, performance is still a concern for me. When dealing with bulk data uploads via a BDI process, some records occasionally fail, requiring me to debug and reprocess them. Enhanced performance is something that I would be interested in.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I find the reporting features impactful."
"CRM's performance is good, we've never faced any issues with it."
"It has a wide variety of use cases."
"Oracle CRM integrates seamlessly because it's an end-to-end solution."
"It helps our company interact with our customers, track leads and opportunities, determine how many opportunities are transferred into actual sales, and other such areas."
"The most valuable features of the solution are that it is user-friendly and the fact that the database handling is much better, like any other Oracle solution."
"Technical support is very fast. It's customer friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically enrich deals by connecting to APIs. This allows me to gather additional information about companies, number of employees, and data from the previous year. Having this information helps me understand the size of the company better and tailor my proposals accordingly."
"It offers a seamless experience with quick deployment—eliminating prolonged implementation and installation processes."
"The solution changes the way clients work to make it easier and faster."
"It supports various APIs and connectors, enabling seamless communication with other systems, including both Oracle products and third-party applications."
"Oracle offers a wide range of applications, each capable of delivering significant value to our business."
"There is a focus on maintaining efficiency, and it is a significant time saver."
"I find the ERP Fusion Console valuable since it centralizes all the modules like order management."
"I find the ERP Fusion Console valuable since it centralizes all the modules like order management."
"Oracle Cloud Services integrates well. It has lots of APIs to integrate with other solutions, like the PBX we use from Cisco. The ability to integrate Siebel data with Cisco PBX was nice."
 

Cons

"The performance could be better."
"The cost can be a bit more expensive compared to other options."
"It’s complex to customize the tool."
"The product is not intuitive."
"The initial setup is complex, it could be improved to be more simplified."
"Our infrastructure is set up for an on-premises deployment of this solution and I am concerned that the online deployment that we are moving to will not perform as well as our current on-premises storage systems. It could cause some problems, such as latency delays."
"The one thing that I hate about it is when you pay for services for a certain amount of time, the service ends just before it should be over. For example, I may pay for a month of service, but it will tell me the service is over before the month ends."
"A specialized team is required for managing Oracle, which is extra overhead for the customer."
"I would like to see more AI usage, enhanced personalization capabilities, and simpler integration capabilities."
"Delivering the solution to clients can be quite complex and requires highly trained technicians with expertise."
"We built some custom code to make a few functions easier. Oracle needs to look at what the customers do and integrate them into the product."
"Oracle Service Cloud could improve the integration for older platforms."
"Oracle counts users for licensing purposes, regardless of their roles or usage patterns. This process could be better."
"There are specific areas that would be beneficial to enhance and improve, especially its financial functionality, search capabilities, chat features, and content articles."
"One suggestion I have is to shorten the IT team's response time. When we submit an ASR or similar request, it takes a while to receive a response, and this can be seen as a drawback."
"The vendor must provide a user-friendly mobile application."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Shifting from traditional licensing and monthly maintenance fees to a subscription-based, pay-as-you-use model offers several advantages. This approach only charges me for my transactions, aligning costs with business performance. As my company grows, the software provider's revenue grows proportionally to the increased usage. The cost and suitability of Oracle CRM depend on factors like location, industry, and compliance needs. It may be more common for US companies to use Oracle CRM and European ones to use SAP."
"The pricing for licensing is pretty expensive. If you need one particular feature it becomes expensive to have to continue paying for it."
"The solution is expensive."
"The costing for this solution is very high. It targets top tier companies. This solution can be split up into multiple modules to cater to the low tier customers."
"We have annual licenses to use this solution that are quite expensive. For example, we have approximately four types of licenses and we have one annual contract for the number of licenses we use for Oracle CRM and the loyalty system."
"The product’s pricing is very high."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a twelve. Oracle CRM is on the expensive side."
"There is a license required to use this solution. The price is reasonable for a CRM."
"Licensing fees are on the higher end and I rate them an eight out of ten."
"This is definitely an expensive product compared to others on the market."
"The tool is reasonably priced."
"There are no extra licenses, everything is included in the subscription, and the price is fixed."
"Oracle Fusion Service is more expensive than Workday."
"The product has average pricing."
"Oracle Fusion Service is a cheap and flexible solution."
"Oracle's pricing is quite high, and this cost can be a significant barrier, especially for smaller companies."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
University
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
81%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle CRM?
The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically enrich deals by connecting to APIs. This allows me to gather additional information about companies, number of employees, and data from the...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle CRM?
The price of Oracle CRM in Vietnam is high, which is a concern. Clients must buy the license once, and if there are updates in the year, they need to buy the new version.
What needs improvement with Oracle CRM?
Oracle CRM should improve in terms of AI capabilities and user interface design. Compared to Salesforce, it lacks advanced features in these areas and is not as user-friendly.
What needs improvement with Oracle Service Cloud?
I would like to see more AI usage, enhanced personalization capabilities, and simpler integration capabilities.
 

Also Known As

Market2Lead
Oracle Service Cloud, Oracle RightNow
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Turk Telekom, yoo Ltd , Mobilitec, Sanipex Group, ec4u expert consulting AG, Hover Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Lawn Tennis Association, Geodis, Freedom Technology
Pacifico Seguros Generales, Elsevier B.V., Madison Area Technical College, Bigtree Entertainment, Pvt. Ltd., HM Land Registry, Walmart Stores Inc., MakeMyTrip Ltd., Orbitz Worldwide LLC, Big Fish Games Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle CRM vs. Oracle Fusion Service and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.