Microsoft Exchange Online Reviews

I am using Microsoft Exchange Online for efficient mail deployment the additional file security. Additionally, we can do a collaboration.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange Online is its ease of use.

Microsoft Exchange Online could improve the overall protection of the solution.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online for approximately three months.

The stability of Microsoft Exchange Online is very good.

Microsoft Exchange Online is highly scalable.

We have approximately 10 people using this solution. We have plans to increase the usage in the future.

I have not used the support from Microsoft Exchange Online.

The initial setup of Microsoft Exchange Online is quick.

The price of Microsoft Exchange Online security could improve. The overall price of the solution is reasonable.

I rate Microsoft Exchange Online a nine out of ten.

I am using Microsoft Exchange Online for email.

Microsoft Exchange Online is an easy-to-use solution.

We would like to have more automation with Microsoft Exchange Online.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online for two years.

We have approximately 3,000 used in my company using this solution.

The solution is scalable.

I have not contacted support.

I have not used other solutions previously.

There is an annual license required to use this Microsoft Exchange Online.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Exchange Online an eight out of ten.

I am an implementer of this solution. My clients use it as an email solution.

There are many valuable features such as email, calendar, and the ability to share your calendar and documents with coworkers. Knowing that the emails go through the EOP filtering service is nice as well.

I would like to have the option to have my electronic signature posted on my emails by default. I am able to add it manually but cannot get it by default.

It's a stable solution.

Microsoft always has nice support. You are able to create some tickets on the  Microsoft support pop up, it's quite simple.

On-premise setup for one server took about seven hours in total - I would expect this time to double, triple, etc. depending on the number of servers that you have.

I would expect cloud deployment to be significantly faster - maybe two hours for 100 email boxes.

We used an in-house team of one senior engineer and one junior engineer.

I think that the price is a little high, especially considering that Google have a similar, free email solution.

If you are looking to deploy on-premise, make sure that you have a small data center, or even a small room for physical security. Otherwise, you should deploy Exchange online.

My primary use case for this solution is for clumping emails, and group emails according to the conversation. It helps us sift through 100s of emails.

This solution helped us reduce a lot of overhead. 

I would love to have a feature that transfers my notes that I have written on my laptop to my mobile device. Also, I think the mobile app on the forms you can improve a little bit more.

I have not encountered any issues with stability of the product at all. 

We have roughly 500 people using this product in our organization. We have had no problem scaling it with our users.

The initial setup was straightforward. But, it took a bit of time because we had a lot of PST files with the users, and we had to migrate them batch by batch.

I am familiar with Google and G Suite. I do not have personal comparisons between the two.

We used the solution for emails and communication.

The solution was better and faster than Microsoft Mail. It was versatile. Integrating with the domain users was very simple. It was very easy to connect to other technology. The product was simple to use. It had all the features I needed.

It will be much better if the tool is integrated with OpenAI. Integrating with OpenAI will make all the options available to the users. It will be helpful for administrators.

I have used the solution for six years.

The product was quite stable.

We had 100 users in my previous organization. We needed two engineers for the maintenance of the solution.

I recently joined a new organization. I am currently using BigRock. I am planning to migrate to Microsoft Exchange. I have recommended it to our management.

The initial setup was very straightforward. I required emails and domain connectivity for the users. I wanted all the users to be able to send emails locally and to external users. I also wanted the server to communicate with the ISP. It was easy to configure the solution. A team of engineers deployed the tool.

I recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the product a ten out of ten.

 I primarily use Exchange Online to communicate with other users.

Exchange Online's scalability could be improved.

I've been working with Exchange Online for four to five years.

I would rate Exchange Online's stability nine out of ten.

I would rate Exchange Online's scalability eight out of ten.

The initial setup was straightforward

We have seen a return on investment from Exchange Online.

I would recommend Exchange Online to other users and rate it eight out of ten.

I primarily use this solution for an email bank for my organization. 

From the security point of view, you can specify the IP range from the area your system should be connected. You can have the authentication based on the user certificates of your Active Directory. This improves the security, as well. There is a flawless integration. This is something I like about Exchange.

I think there should be an incorporation of DLP on the business premium version of Exchange as well.

There have been some occasional deviations, but overall it is a stable product.

We have 3,000 users. We have not encountered any issues with scalability of the product. 

A long time ago we used Zimbra and Postmaster. In comparison, in terms of manageability there was a concern with those solutions. Exchange excels in comparison.

The implementation only took us about an hour. You just connect easily, set up the domain, and you are good to go! We implemented it for 3,000 users. 

The price is a bit high. It is especially expensive in the Indian market. 

When we were looking at other solutions, we noticed that Exchange has a better collaborative approach with SharePoint, as well. That is important for us. In terms of the DLP, others are using endpoint DLP, but not the email DLP like Exchange is currently doing.

I use the latest version. 

The solution obviates the need for infrastructure. The model is pay-per-use. We are not talking about a single email but a complete collaboration suite. One gets very well integrated IT which is tightly stitched with collaborations. One can chat and field calls. As such, it is not only Exchange Online coming on, but Office 365 Suites, which Microsoft provides the users. This availability ranges from first-line workers to CEO level users, depending on one's requirements. All the industry needs are covered. One can take the model best suited to him and tailor his solution to his investment capacity needs. 

This means that the solution offers complete scalability and flexibility. A business user who occupies a very small portion of the industry can pay less for a suite. The desktop and web versions are also options. The solution's handy. One can use it on his mobile, or any other devices, including multiple devices and single identity. So, the picture is comprised of many components. 

The solution should have more integration with other platforms. It is more integrated to the collaboration suite and other document management systems. 

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online for the last couple of years.

The solution boasts complete scalability. 

As the solution is cloud-based, there is no installation required. There is no need to worry about its applications and no license. We are talking about per-user subscription-based use. 

When it comes to the license, we are already talking about Microsoft. There is also provisioning. Otherwise, it's just plug and play. There are not many administrative tasks involved.

The model is one which is pay-per-use go. There is no license. We are talking about per-user subscription-based use.

When it comes to the license, we are already talking about Microsoft. There is also provisioning. Otherwise, it's just plug and play. There are not many administrative tasks involved. 

A business user who occupies a very small portion of the industry can pay less for a suite. The desktop and web versions are also posibilities.

The solution is an SaaS cloud-based solution. 

There are a thousand-plus users making use of the solution in our organization. 

I would recommend the solution to others, although this depends on the capacity one is interested in and whether he utilizes another solution. For someone who wants the complete bouquet of the solution, he can go with Office 365. There are others solutions which are geared to one who is only interested in email capabilities. There are many cloud-based solutions available, although these vary with the needs of the organization. Office 365 is geared towards someone who is looking for a complete collaboration suite. Someone who is not looking for this is advised to go with another solution. 

I rate Microsoft Office Exchange as an eight to nine out of ten.