Microsoft Exchange Online Reviews

I am an implementer of this solution. My clients use it as an email solution.

There are many valuable features such as email, calendar, and the ability to share your calendar and documents with coworkers. Knowing that the emails go through the EOP filtering service is nice as well.

I would like to have the option to have my electronic signature posted on my emails by default. I am able to add it manually but cannot get it by default.

It's a stable solution.

Microsoft always has nice support. You are able to create some tickets on the  Microsoft support pop up, it's quite simple.

On-premise setup for one server took about seven hours in total - I would expect this time to double, triple, etc. depending on the number of servers that you have.

I would expect cloud deployment to be significantly faster - maybe two hours for 100 email boxes.

We used an in-house team of one senior engineer and one junior engineer.

I think that the price is a little high, especially considering that Google have a similar, free email solution.

If you are looking to deploy on-premise, make sure that you have a small data center, or even a small room for physical security. Otherwise, you should deploy Exchange online.

We use this solution for planning tasks. We need to upgrade 5,000 computers and we have to assign that to several different teams of people. As the tasks are completed, we are expecting updates regarding the status and other relevant information.

We are not very happy with this product.

The most valuable feature is being able to assign an individual a task. 

This product is too complex to use.

It could be more streamlined because it offers an overabundance of features. It's simultaneously offering you to do 10 different things and it's confusing as to what we should do first.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online for about two years.

We have had no issues with stability.

We have a couple of thousand users. 

The initial setup is pretty simple.

We have an enterprise agreement for licensing.

I would rate this solution a five out of ten.

We have 2,000 users supported by this solution. 

The best part of this solution is the security it offers. Where we are able to determine which mailboxes have been blocked, or which mailboxes cannot be allowed to send traffic because of a violation. 

This solution involves a lot of work for an administrator. It is not always easy to find exactly what you are looking for within the system. Microsoft can do better in terms of security and offer solutions to deal with phising, BOMB and viruses.

I have been using this solution for two years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution, especially if you make use of many Microsoft products. 

The technical support for this solution is really good. I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

The initial setup is very complex. 

This is an expensive solution. 

We did evaluate other options including Zimbra. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of of ten. 

I primarily use this solution for an email bank for my organization. 

From the security point of view, you can specify the IP range from the area your system should be connected. You can have the authentication based on the user certificates of your Active Directory. This improves the security, as well. There is a flawless integration. This is something I like about Exchange.

I think there should be an incorporation of DLP on the business premium version of Exchange as well.

There have been some occasional deviations, but overall it is a stable product.

We have 3,000 users. We have not encountered any issues with scalability of the product. 

A long time ago we used Zimbra and Postmaster. In comparison, in terms of manageability there was a concern with those solutions. Exchange excels in comparison.

The implementation only took us about an hour. You just connect easily, set up the domain, and you are good to go! We implemented it for 3,000 users. 

The price is a bit high. It is especially expensive in the Indian market. 

When we were looking at other solutions, we noticed that Exchange has a better collaborative approach with SharePoint, as well. That is important for us. In terms of the DLP, others are using endpoint DLP, but not the email DLP like Exchange is currently doing.

Exchange Online's best feature is its webmail platform.

Exchange Online has issues with its mail flow and content search.

I've been using Exchange Online for two years.

Exchange Online is stable.

Exchange Online is very scalable

The initial setup was very basic.

I implemented Exchange Online myself.

We have a yearly license for Exchange Online.

I would recommend Exchange Online to other users and rate it nine out of ten.

My primary use case for this solution is for clumping emails, and group emails according to the conversation. It helps us sift through 100s of emails.

This solution helped us reduce a lot of overhead. 

I would love to have a feature that transfers my notes that I have written on my laptop to my mobile device. Also, I think the mobile app on the forms you can improve a little bit more.

I have not encountered any issues with stability of the product at all. 

We have roughly 500 people using this product in our organization. We have had no problem scaling it with our users.

The initial setup was straightforward. But, it took a bit of time because we had a lot of PST files with the users, and we had to migrate them batch by batch.

I am familiar with Google and G Suite. I do not have personal comparisons between the two.

I like that Exchange Online is easy to use and that I do not need to maintain the previous Exchange Server. I also do not need to worry about the security of the Exchange Server. If there are any issues, then it will be the service provider's problem and not mine.

Microsoft needs to lower the price of the extra production add-ins for Exchange Online.

I just switched to Microsoft Exchange Online two months ago but have been using the on-premises version for a year.

It has been stable so far.

I believe that it is scalable. At present, we have three users.

It's very easy to set up. It can be done in one hour by one person. Also, one person can handle the maintenance as well.

I would rate this solution at nine on a scale from one to ten and would recommend it as well.

 I primarily use Exchange Online to communicate with other users.

Exchange Online's scalability could be improved.

I've been working with Exchange Online for four to five years.

I would rate Exchange Online's stability nine out of ten.

I would rate Exchange Online's scalability eight out of ten.

The initial setup was straightforward

We have seen a return on investment from Exchange Online.

I would recommend Exchange Online to other users and rate it eight out of ten.