Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Lansweeper based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include ServiceNow, Qualys VMDR, and ServiceNow Discovery.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Lansweeper Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Lansweeper, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
ServiceNow excels in customization and integration for IT and business management, ideal for companies needing tailored solutions. In comparison, Lansweeper prioritizes user-friendly asset management, offering detailed insights and cost-effectiveness for organizations focusing on precise IT inventory tracking.
Qualys VMDR offers extensive scanning and integration features, making it great for comprehensive security management. In comparison, Lansweeper excels in asset visibility and inventory for better network oversight. Qualys VMDR's efficient customer service benefits deployment, while Lansweeper's pricing ensures quicker ROI for tech buyers.
Qualys VMDR's setup cost is discussed as high while Lansweeper is noted for its lower setup cost. This significant difference positions Qualys VMDR as a premium option compared to Lansweeper.
Qualys VMDR's setup cost is discussed as high while Lansweeper is noted for its lower setup cost. This significant difference positions Qualys VMDR as a premium option compared to Lansweeper.
ServiceNow Discovery offers comprehensive integration with ITSM and ITOM, suitable for complex IT environments. In comparison, Lansweeper is ideal for small to medium businesses with its flexible asset management. Lansweeper excels in cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, while ServiceNow Discovery supports diverse cloud environments.
ServiceNow Discovery often incurs higher initial setup costs, focusing on complex IT environments, whereas Lansweeper generally offers a more affordable setup, appealing to smaller businesses with less intricate infrastructure needs.
ServiceNow Discovery often incurs higher initial setup costs, focusing on complex IT environments, whereas Lansweeper generally offers a more affordable setup, appealing to smaller businesses with less intricate infrastructure needs.
Freshservice supports ITIL-compliant processes through automation and analytics, ideal for centralized IT services. In comparison, Lansweeper focuses on IT asset management, providing inventory tracking suited for large networks, appealing to those prioritizing cybersecurity compliance.
Device42 focuses on security and relational mapping, making it ideal for security-focused IT environments. In comparison, Lansweeper excels in detailed inventory, appealing to large organizations prioritizing asset management. Device42's robust support contrasts with Lansweeper's cost-effective pricing, catering to diverse tech buyer needs.
Device42 has a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, highlighting the differences in initial investment. Lansweeper offers a more cost-effective setup option, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers.
Device42 has a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, highlighting the differences in initial investment. Lansweeper offers a more cost-effective setup option, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers.
Spiceworks excels with minimal setup in ticketing and network integration, ideal for SMBs. In comparison, Lansweeper delivers extensive IT asset management, crucial for cybersecurity. Spiceworks offers a free model; Lansweeper provides broader, scalable features for growing enterprises.
Spiceworks offers no setup cost, making initial deployment straightforward, while Lansweeper includes a variable setup cost, which can affect budget planning.
Spiceworks offers no setup cost, making initial deployment straightforward, while Lansweeper includes a variable setup cost, which can affect budget planning.
BMC Helix Discovery offers advanced features like application dependency mapping and high security, appealing to those seeking comprehensive infrastructure visibility. In comparison, Lansweeper provides detailed IT asset management and affordability, ideal for small and medium businesses needing flexible deployment.
BMC Helix Discovery incurs a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, which is more budget-friendly. This cost difference might affect the decision for businesses prioritizing upfront financial expenditure.
BMC Helix Discovery incurs a higher setup cost compared to Lansweeper, which is more budget-friendly. This cost difference might affect the decision for businesses prioritizing upfront financial expenditure.
BMC Remedy's robust asset management features and scalability appeal to larger enterprises. In comparison, Lansweeper excels in ease of deployment and affordability, making it ideal for small to medium businesses seeking efficient IT asset management. BMC Remedy's technical support contrasts with Lansweeper's simplicity.
ManageEngine IT Asset Management provides strong compliance management and easy integration, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Lansweeper offers a centralized management dashboard and efficient customer service, ideal for those valuing comprehensive asset discovery and a user-friendly setup process.
ManageEngine IT Asset Management incurs higher setup costs, while Lansweeper offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
ManageEngine IT Asset Management incurs higher setup costs, while Lansweeper offers a more economical initial setup, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
BMC Track-It! emphasizes straightforward IT management with accessible deployment and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-minded buyers. In comparison, Lansweeper excels in network scanning and extensive features, making it ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive asset visibility and advanced integration options.
BMC Track-It! requires an initial setup cost, while Lansweeper offers a more flexible pricing structure with relatively lower costs. BMC Track-It! may incur higher initial expenses, setting it apart from Lansweeper's cost-effective approach.
BMC Track-It! requires an initial setup cost, while Lansweeper offers a more flexible pricing structure with relatively lower costs. BMC Track-It! may incur higher initial expenses, setting it apart from Lansweeper's cost-effective approach.
Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance is ideal for those prioritizing efficient automation and customer support. In comparison, Lansweeper offers superior inventory management and lower upfront costs, catering to complex IT environments. Each solution presents unique benefits for various organizational needs.
Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance offers a more predictable setup cost due to its all-inclusive pricing, while Lansweeper provides a flexible, potentially lower initial expense with its pay-as-you-go model.
Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance offers a more predictable setup cost due to its all-inclusive pricing, while Lansweeper provides a flexible, potentially lower initial expense with its pay-as-you-go model.
