Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Moogsoft Logo

Top 10 Moogsoft Alternatives

Vendor: Dell Technologies
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Moogsoft Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Moogsoft based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, Datadog, and Dynatrace. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Moogsoft surpasses its competitors by offering advanced AI-driven incident management, real-time collaboration, and automated root cause analysis, enhancing operational efficiency and reducing downtime for businesses seeking superior performance in IT environments.

Dell Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Dell Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Moogsoft Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers robust open-source monitoring with extensive customization and scalability, ideal for infrastructure management. In comparison, Moogsoft focuses on AI-based incident management with strong event correlation. Zabbix excels in cost-effectiveness, while Moogsoft integrates multiple tools for comprehensive event management.
Download Moogsoft vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers lower setup costs, ideal for budget-conscious users, while Moogsoft requires higher initial investment, justifying it with advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers lower setup costs, ideal for budget-conscious users, while Moogsoft requires higher initial investment, justifying it with advanced features.
Moogsoft Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers versatile analytics and dashboards appealing for diverse environments. In comparison, Moogsoft excels in incident reduction with AI-driven insights, ideal for complex networks. Datadog's cloud-based model facilitates quick platform integration, whereas Moogsoft provides cost-effective AI ops with on-premise licensing.
Download Datadog vs. Moogsoft Report
Datadog's setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its robust infrastructure, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to smaller teams or startups.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its robust infrastructure, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to smaller teams or startups.
Moogsoft Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers expansive monitoring and advanced AI features for comprehensive insights. In comparison, Moogsoft focuses on event correlation and noise reduction, offering cost-effective pricing, making it ideal for efficient IT operations across various environments with significant business impact.
Download Dynatrace vs. Moogsoft Report
Dynatrace offers a higher setup cost, contrasting with Moogsoft's more budget-friendly initial investment. This cost difference highlights Dynatrace's premium positioning compared to Moogsoft's accessible approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace offers a higher setup cost, contrasting with Moogsoft's more budget-friendly initial investment. This cost difference highlights Dynatrace's premium positioning compared to Moogsoft's accessible approach.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security focuses on threat detection and data management, ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive insights. In comparison, Moogsoft provides AI-driven event correlation for streamlined incident management, appealing to dynamic IT settings with its cost-effective, consumption-based model.
Download Moogsoft vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost may be higher than Moogsoft due to its extensive features, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly option with simpler setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost may be higher than Moogsoft due to its extensive features, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly option with simpler setup requirements.
Moogsoft Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Moogsoft excels in AI-driven incident detection and automation, offering competitive pricing and personalized support. In comparison, New Relic provides comprehensive application monitoring and extensive analytics with a seamless cloud platform, justifying its higher cost for businesses seeking detailed insights and long-term value.
Download Moogsoft vs. New Relic Report
Moogsoft has a moderate setup cost, while New Relic offers a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has a moderate setup cost, while New Relic offers a more flexible pricing structure.
Moogsoft Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive application performance insights, ideal for detailed transaction analysis. In comparison, Moogsoft is valued for its noise reduction and real-time event correlation, streamlining IT environments effectively. Splunk AppDynamics excels in diagnostics, while Moogsoft focuses on operational efficiency.
Download Moogsoft vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs than Moogsoft, making it a pricier choice for initial implementation. Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup, attracting those conscious of upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs than Moogsoft, making it a pricier choice for initial implementation. Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup, attracting those conscious of upfront expenses.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Moogsoft excels in real-time incident response and AI-driven anomaly detection, supporting efficient incident management. In comparison, Elastic Observability emphasizes powerful search and visualization tools, offering comprehensive data analysis capabilities for organizations needing robust monitoring across diverse platforms.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Moogsoft Report
Moogsoft's setup cost is competitive, offering potential budget advantages, while Elastic Observability provides a higher setup cost with distinct feature advantages, highlighting different value propositions between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft's setup cost is competitive, offering potential budget advantages, while Elastic Observability provides a higher setup cost with distinct feature advantages, highlighting different value propositions between the two solutions.
Moogsoft Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM offers extensive features like SNMP-based monitoring and modular pricing, making it ideal for multivendor environments. In comparison, Moogsoft emphasizes AI-driven insights and event correlation, appealing to organizations with complex monitoring needs and flexible pricing requirements.
Download Moogsoft vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM requires a higher setup cost, suitable for businesses seeking comprehensive network monitoring, while Moogsoft offers a lower initial investment, attractive for organizations prioritizing budget-friendly solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM requires a higher setup cost, suitable for businesses seeking comprehensive network monitoring, while Moogsoft offers a lower initial investment, attractive for organizations prioritizing budget-friendly solutions.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers real-time monitoring and NetFlow capabilities, appealing for its flexibility across server environments. In comparison, Moogsoft's AI-driven event correlation and noise reduction enhance incident management. PRTG's pricing varies, while Moogsoft provides a competitive consumption-based model.
Download Moogsoft vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor typically incurs lower initial setup costs compared to Moogsoft, which can involve higher expenses. Moogsoft may appeal to enterprises seeking comprehensive features despite greater upfront financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor typically incurs lower initial setup costs compared to Moogsoft, which can involve higher expenses. Moogsoft may appeal to enterprises seeking comprehensive features despite greater upfront financial commitment.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in comprehensive features like monitoring and custom dashboards, attracting tech buyers needing robust integration. In comparison, Moogsoft offers automatic event correlation and AI-driven noise reduction, appealing to those prioritizing effective event management with competitive pricing.
Download Moogsoft vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher setup investment, while Moogsoft is more cost-effective, reflecting their focus on advanced analytics versus streamlined incident management.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher setup investment, while Moogsoft is more cost-effective, reflecting their focus on advanced analytics versus streamlined incident management.
Moogsoft Logo
LogicMonitor
4.3 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
LogicMonitor
4.3 out of 5
Moogsoft offers proactive incident detection and AI-driven insights. In comparison, LogicMonitor provides extensive infrastructure monitoring capabilities. Moogsoft is cost-effective with flexible deployment, while LogicMonitor offers seamless integration and robust features, appealing to businesses prioritizing comprehensive monitoring and efficient support despite a higher entry cost.
Download LogicMonitor vs. Moogsoft Report
Moogsoft setup costs are lower, while LogicMonitor offers more comprehensive setup support.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft setup costs are lower, while LogicMonitor offers more comprehensive setup support.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Moogsoft excels in operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness, appealing to smaller businesses with features like automated anomaly detection. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management attracts larger enterprises with its comprehensive suite offering workflow automation and integrated IT dashboards, justifying its higher investment.
Download Moogsoft vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management Report
Moogsoft has a lower setup cost and offers straightforward configuration, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management presents a higher initial setup cost with advanced integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has a lower setup cost and offers straightforward configuration, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management presents a higher initial setup cost with advanced integration capabilities.
Moogsoft Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers extensive customization for organizations needing diverse monitoring, while Moogsoft excels in AI-driven incident management. In comparison, ScienceLogic provides flexible deployment options, whereas Moogsoft offers affordability in AI ops solutions, appealing to tech buyers with cost-effective needs.
Download Moogsoft vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic's setup cost is typically higher, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup option suitable for smaller enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic's setup cost is typically higher, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup option suitable for smaller enterprises.
Moogsoft Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Moogsoft appeals with affordability and efficient AI-driven incident management, suiting cost-conscious organizations. In comparison, OpsRamp targets businesses needing extensive functionalities, offering detailed infrastructure management and scalability for a higher investment, making it suitable for comprehensive IT operations.
Download Moogsoft vs. OpsRamp Report
Moogsoft requires a moderate initial investment with a streamlined setup, whereas OpsRamp involves a higher setup cost with a slightly more complex configuration process.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft requires a moderate initial investment with a streamlined setup, whereas OpsRamp involves a higher setup cost with a slightly more complex configuration process.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
PagerDuty Operations Cloud
4.4 out of 5
PagerDuty excels in alert management with seamless integration and versatile notification systems. In comparison, Moogsoft leverages AI for noise reduction and incident correlation, enhancing operational efficiency. PagerDuty suits automation-focused buyers, while Moogsoft appeals to those prioritizing AI-driven analytics.
Download Moogsoft vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud Report
PagerDuty Operations Cloud has a straightforward setup cost, while Moogsoft features a more flexible pricing approach, highlighting distinct initial investment differences.
View comparison
Pricing
PagerDuty Operations Cloud has a straightforward setup cost, while Moogsoft features a more flexible pricing approach, highlighting distinct initial investment differences.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
Moogsoft's effective pricing and superior support services suit cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications justifies its cost with comprehensive features. Moogsoft simplifies incident management, while VMware offers advanced analytics for deep operational insights, meeting diverse business priorities.
Download Moogsoft vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Moogsoft has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMware Aria Operations for Applications, which can represent a significant upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMware Aria Operations for Applications, which can represent a significant upfront investment.
Moogsoft Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight integrates diverse IT assets with robust event management but faces complexity in deployment. In comparison, Moogsoft focuses on AI-driven event correlation, simplifying incident handling. Both cater to different needs, with TrueSight offering extensive features and Moogsoft emphasizing automation and flexibility.
Download BMC TrueSight vs. Moogsoft Report
BMC TrueSight involves a significant initial setup cost, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight involves a significant initial setup cost, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Moogsoft Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Moogsoft offers proactive incident management with event correlation and noise reduction, enhancing IT efficiency. In comparison, Devo excels in real-time analytics and scalability, providing deep insights. Moogsoft suits those prioritizing incident prevention, while Devo attracts those needing detailed log analysis.
Download Devo vs. Moogsoft Report
Moogsoft has affordable setup costs that appeal to small businesses, while Devo requires a higher initial investment, making it more suitable for enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has affordable setup costs that appeal to small businesses, while Devo requires a higher initial investment, making it more suitable for enterprises.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
4.1 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers extensive scalability and diverse monitoring features for various environments. In comparison, Moogsoft focuses on AI-driven incident management and alert aggregation efficiency. Technical buyers might prefer DX for its feature set or Moogsoft for advanced AI capabilities.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Moogsoft Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management involves high initial setup costs, while Moogsoft offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management involves high initial setup costs, while Moogsoft offers a more cost-effective setup.
Moogsoft Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
Moogsoft appeals with its AI-driven insights and competitive pricing, making it ideal for cost-conscious tech buyers seeking efficient operations. In comparison, ControlUp offers a rich feature set with detailed analytics, attracting those who need robust performance tracking and comprehensive monitoring.
Download ControlUp vs. Moogsoft Report
Moogsoft offers a flexible setup with lower initial costs, while ControlUp requires higher upfront expenses, distinguishing their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft offers a flexible setup with lower initial costs, while ControlUp requires higher upfront expenses, distinguishing their pricing strategies.
Moogsoft Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
BigPanda excels in alert management and AI integration with flexible cloud deployments, while Moogsoft enhances event correlation and offers wider deployment options. In comparison, Moogsoft's Situation Room groups events efficiently. BigPanda's pricing model supports growth, whereas Moogsoft offers competitive on-premise licensing.
Download BigPanda vs. Moogsoft Report
BigPanda offers a straightforward setup cost, while Moogsoft may involve varying costs depending on specific requirements, highlighting a difference in cost transparency and predictability.
View comparison
Pricing
BigPanda offers a straightforward setup cost, while Moogsoft may involve varying costs depending on specific requirements, highlighting a difference in cost transparency and predictability.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics
3.9 out of 5
Moogsoft is praised for its AI-driven incident management, favoring cost-effective event correlation. In comparison, SolarWinds AppOptics is preferred for comprehensive infrastructure and application monitoring, offering significant ROI. Both offer strong customer support, with SolarWinds AppOptics known for intuitive deployment.
Download Moogsoft vs. SolarWinds AppOptics Report
Moogsoft offers a more cost-effective setup, while SolarWinds AppOptics involves higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft offers a more cost-effective setup, while SolarWinds AppOptics involves higher initial expenses.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
OpenText AI Operations Management
3.9 out of 5
OpenText AI Operations Management integrates data into a unified dashboard, enhancing cost and efficiency, while Moogsoft AIOps emphasizes AI-driven event handling and alarm reduction. In comparison, Moogsoft offers flexible deployment options and competitive pricing with a consumption-based model.
Download Moogsoft vs. OpenText AI Operations Management Report
OpenText AI Operations Management has higher setup costs compared to Moogsoft, which offers a more budget-friendly alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText AI Operations Management has higher setup costs compared to Moogsoft, which offers a more budget-friendly alternative.
Moogsoft Logo
Loom Systems
4.0 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
Loom Systems
4.0 out of 5
Moogsoft improves incident response with automated anomaly detection. In comparison, Loom Systems excels in predictive analytics and seamless integration. Moogsoft offers budget-friendly options; however, Loom Systems' predictive capabilities can yield higher ROI over time.
Download Loom Systems vs. Moogsoft Report
Moogsoft's setup cost can be higher compared to Loom Systems, which often provides a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft's setup cost can be higher compared to Loom Systems, which often provides a more budget-friendly setup.
Moogsoft Logo
Evanios
4.8 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
Evanios
4.8 out of 5
Moogsoft excels in incident management and noise reduction, offering straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Evanios provides robust integration and advanced automation with a comprehensive feature set that appeals to complex IT environments, ensuring a strong return on investment.
Download Evanios vs. Moogsoft Report
Moogsoft offers competitive setup costs with straightforward implementation, while Evanios may incur higher initial expenses. This difference highlights Moogsoft's cost-effectiveness compared to Evanios's potentially larger upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft offers competitive setup costs with straightforward implementation, while Evanios may incur higher initial expenses. This difference highlights Moogsoft's cost-effectiveness compared to Evanios's potentially larger upfront investment.
Moogsoft Logo
Resolve AI
1 out of 5
Moogsoft Logo
Resolve AI
1 out of 5
Moogsoft offers real-time anomaly detection, enhancing operational visibility through effective event correlation. In comparison, Resolve AI excels with extensive orchestration and integration options. Moogsoft suits those seeking detailed insights, while Resolve AI appeals to those needing comprehensive automation and seamless integration.
Moogsoft has a significantly lower setup cost compared to Resolve AI, which might impact the upfront investment decision for organizations. Resolve AI offers extensive initial configuration features that may justify its higher setup cost for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has a significantly lower setup cost compared to Resolve AI, which might impact the upfront investment decision for organizations. Resolve AI offers extensive initial configuration features that may justify its higher setup cost for larger enterprises.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
ignio AIOps Platform
1 out of 5
Moogsoft attracts tech buyers with its competitive pricing, effective support, and efficient event correlation. In comparison, ignio AIOps Platform offers advanced automation and orchestration features, appealing to those seeking long-term operational optimization and willing to invest in its comprehensive capabilities.
Moogsoft has a lower initial setup cost compared to ignio AIOps Platform, making it potentially more budget-friendly for new adopters. ignio AIOps Platform may entail higher initial investments, indicating a focus on comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has a lower initial setup cost compared to ignio AIOps Platform, making it potentially more budget-friendly for new adopters. ignio AIOps Platform may entail higher initial investments, indicating a focus on comprehensive capabilities.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service
3.7 out of 5
Moogsoft offers competitive pricing and an intuitive deployment process, attracting cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service, with robust features and advanced analytical tools, appeals to enterprises looking for comprehensive log analytics and seamless integration with Oracle's cloud ecosystem.
Download Moogsoft vs. Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service Report
Moogsoft has higher setup costs compared to Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has higher setup costs compared to Oracle Log Analytics Cloud Service, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer
3.8 out of 5
Moogsoft excels in AI-driven incident management, making it a top choice for those prioritizing fast resolution and effective support. In comparison, Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer focuses on data analytics and performance monitoring, offering extensive features that appeal to buyers seeking comprehensive infrastructure assessment.
Download Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer vs. Moogsoft Report
Moogsoft has a higher initial setup cost than Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has a higher initial setup cost than Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
SAP IT Operations Analytics
4.2 out of 5
Moogsoft offers real-time event correlation and user-friendly deployment for efficient incident management. In comparison, SAP IT Operations Analytics provides robust predictive analytics and comprehensive support, appealing to enterprises seeking extensive features despite higher costs for long-term optimization.
Download Moogsoft vs. SAP IT Operations Analytics Report
Moogsoft has a lower setup cost with straightforward installation, while SAP IT Operations Analytics involves higher initial expenses and a more complex configuration process.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has a lower setup cost with straightforward installation, while SAP IT Operations Analytics involves higher initial expenses and a more complex configuration process.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
Oracle IT Analytics Cloud Service
4.0 out of 5
Moogsoft attracts buyers with its cost-effectiveness and responsive customer service. In comparison, Oracle IT Analytics Cloud Service targets enterprises with advanced analytics features, offering significant integration benefits for those using Oracle products and seeking comprehensive, long-term IT operations management solutions.
Moogsoft offers a flexible setup cost, making it suitable for growing businesses, while Oracle IT Analytics Cloud Service has a more structured pricing plan, which may appeal to enterprises seeking comprehensive analytics capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft offers a flexible setup cost, making it suitable for growing businesses, while Oracle IT Analytics Cloud Service has a more structured pricing plan, which may appeal to enterprises seeking comprehensive analytics capabilities.
Moogsoft Logo
Moogsoft Logo
IBM SmartCloud Analytics
1 out of 5
IBM SmartCloud Analytics excels in comprehensive data integration and reporting, ideal for large enterprises seeking extensive management capabilities. In comparison, Moogsoft provides AI-driven incident management with quicker cloud deployment, appealing to those prioritizing agile problem-solving and efficient operational workflows.
IBM SmartCloud Analytics has a lower setup cost, while Moogsoft offers higher flexibility with its initial investment, highlighting the cost disparity between the solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SmartCloud Analytics has a lower setup cost, while Moogsoft offers higher flexibility with its initial investment, highlighting the cost disparity between the solutions.

Related categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring
IT Operations Analytics
AIOps