Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user293898 - PeerSpot reviewer
.NET Web Development Manager at a music company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
It provides on-demand profiling, allows for ApDex/error monitoring, and we're able to quickly identify how our product behaves in production.

What is most valuable?

  • On-demand profiling – This gives us the ability to execute a thread profiler on demand and get a very in depth view of call costs
  • ApDex/Error monitoring – As a dev-ops solution, this is a great tool because we’re able to help predict issues before the end-user starts notifying us. We can set thresholds that are based on our metrics

How has it helped my organization?

We are now able to quickly identify how our product behaves in production. Before New Relic APM, we would push a build, and try to dig through a plethora of information (event logs, error messages, customer feedback, etc) to find problem spots. Instead, we now publish and can see all the key stats (apdex, response time, error rate, etc.) and quickly drill into what’s causing an issue.

What needs improvement?

More configurability through the dashboard, for example, being able to ignore transactions without the need to update the config or code.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using it for two years and alongside Insights for one year.

Buyer's Guide
New Relic
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about New Relic. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and support?

Really high. While we’ve never had any major issue, the ticket I’ve opened have received responses within a couple hours with quality answers.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We didn’t use any other solutions prior to this.

How was the initial setup?

It was straightforward. On each of our servers, we installed the agent, added our key to a config, and then within minute we were seeing metrics on our site.

What about the implementation team?

In-house. Always start with your development or QA environment. While we had no issues, it’s best to take a dry run, and get a feel for how the app affects performance to see if the data is what you’re looking for.

What was our ROI?

I have no hard numbers detailing how much we get back for what we pay. However, as a dev-ops tool, it has been priceless. We are now able to pinpoint issues much quicker and can significantly reduce our downtime.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did evaluate one additional tool but the install and integration was significantly more cumbersome. The core reason we chose New Relic was the ease of us and the quality of the metrics it gave us. Within hours of demoing the product, we were already learning more about our application than we expected.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
System Administrator at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
In-depth reports, reliable, and straightforward installation
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
  • "The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."

What is our primary use case?

We are using New Relic APM to monitor our production application and to get some insight into performance.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information.

What needs improvement?

The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using New Relic APM for approximately six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability has been fine.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. We had a lot of infrastructure at the beginning and it worked well.

How are customer service and support?

The support could improve because they are not very fast and the information was not very accurate.

I would rate the technical support a three out of five.

How was the initial setup?

The installation is straightforward, and it only took approximately one month.

What about the implementation team?

Our office did the implementation of the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of the solution could be less expensive. You have to pay a lot for each user. There is an additional cost for extra features.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others is this solution is working fine for me and it might most likely be for you too.

I rate New Relic APM a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
New Relic
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about New Relic. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user344535 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Director at Ontegrity
Consultant
It allows us to perform threshold testing to see how quickly transactions are getting out to customers, providing us with data such as response time and adequacy.

What is most valuable?

We used it more heavily before Synthetics came, but it’s kind of like Synthetics, but used domestically.

It allows us to perform threshold testing to see how quickly transactions are getting out to customers, providing us with data such as response time and adequacy.

Our software does significant data queries, so we throttle performance according to region just to keep the application up. Now we can open it up completely because of New Relic tools.

Ability to quickly identify different browser usage performance issues across our application functions. Again saves time in coding to enhance the end user experience.

How has it helped my organization?

It enables us to fine-tune our application quicker. It's also better if we find issues in our application than if our customers find it.

It also prevents performance issues because we're able to see potential issues before they cause real problems.

What needs improvement?

I can't recommend any improvements to Browser. I really can’t find anything that I don’t like about these apps.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Deployment was very simple.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We've encountered no issues with stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scaling has not been a problem.

How is customer service and technical support?

I've not had to use technical support.

How was the initial setup?

We had no problems setting it up.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user344514 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
Although it isn’t as expressive as SQL, we're able to implement a solution that uses New Relic's API to provide data so the project manager can query it using NRQL.

What is most valuable?

It's schema-less and unconstrained to queries. And although NRQL isn’t as expressive as SQL, we're able to implement a solution that uses New Relic's API to provide data so the project manager can query it using NRQL.

They announced that they’re expanding a GUI to make NRQL even less technical.

How has it helped my organization?

Helped us understand that we had a professional group of our users that we didn’t even know about.

It identified mechanized behavior (e.g. bots) and then blocked them.

What needs improvement?

Raw transaction didn’t give us data that we needed. We needed user information so we needed to supply the data with an API.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It’s built to stay up. We starting sending a ton of data to them. They were able to deal with it on their end given their internal architecture. We had a marketing partnership with them.

How are customer service and technical support?

It’s responsive. When I have had questions, we used the forum. As a big customer, we get a response within a few hours.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Our CTO came back from a conference last year and we were trying to solve a problem using DynamoDB, S3 and Redis (trying to solve the user segmentation question and analyze user behavior). Within a few hours of implementing the API, I was able to query for what we needed. You could do a lot with elastic search, but that needs a team of three people.

How was the initial setup?

No complexity. Just an API call.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

They charge by the number of events and for the retention.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user293898 - PeerSpot reviewer
.NET Web Development Manager at a music company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
We've been able to create and report on custom metrics or events in real-time.

What is most valuable?

  • Custom instrumentation/events. We use this tool are additional analytics and debugging.
  • With limited code, we can create and report on custom metrics or events in real-time. This allows us to quickly identify success rates of our efforts.

What needs improvement?

Joining datasets. Currently, it’s only possible to pull data from a single event type. It would be nice to do more of a SQL-like join, for example, CheckOut events with ItemsAddedToCartEvent.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using it for one year, and alongside their APM, which I've been using for two years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and technical support?

Really high. While we’ve never had any major issue, the ticket I’ve opened have received responses within a couple hours with quality answers.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We didn’t use any other solutions prior to this.

How was the initial setup?

It was straightforward. On each of our servers, we installed the agent, added our key to a config, and then within minutes we were seeing metrics on our site.

What about the implementation team?

In-house. Always start with your development or QA environment. While we had no issues, it’s best to take a dry run, and get a feel for how the app affects performance to see if the data is what you’re looking for.

What was our ROI?

I have no hard numbers detailing how much we get back for what we pay. However, as a dev-ops tool, it has been priceless. We are now able to pinpoint issues much quicker and can significantly reduce our downtime.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did evaluate one additional tool but the install and integration was significantly more cumbersome.

The core reason we chose New Relic was the ease of us and the quality of the metrics it gave us. Within hours of demo-ing the product, we were already learning more about our application than we expected.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user3396 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user3396Team Lead at Tata Consultancy Services
Top 5Real User

Cool review

it_user167271 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Unix Engineer + Managing Dir at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Most important feature is the real time application performance & capacity reporting - complete product that just works.

What is most valuable?

We are using the SLA reporting, server monitoring and alerting, however the main and most important feature for Mangocam is the real time application performance and capacity reporting. We are also using plugins for memcached and database monitoring and alerting.

How has it helped my organization?

New Relic has changed the way we are dealing with application problems. It's the first place for our administrators to check if we encounter issues. In most cases, New Relic can immediately pinpoint the root cause of the issue, be it application errors, slow transactions, external services, database throughput or high transaction count. New Relic can monitor thresholds and alert if required. We are also using New Relic to help understand performance tests and bottlenecks.

What needs improvement?

Some of the 3rd party plugins could be improved - especially the requirement for java to monitor simple network services is not ideal. Also the pricing / plans may need restructuring as there is a big gap between the free offering and the first paid tier.

For how long have I used the solution?

About three years for Mangocam.com, also at two other companies as IT consultant for the last 4 years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

We have used the PHP and Java monitoring modules as well as the server monitoring service without many problems. There was an initial glitch with the javascript injection on parts of our site, which has been sorted out quickly with the help of the New Relic support.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

None so far. The service is very mature and very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

None so far. However, the amount of servers and services connected is limited.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

We only had to contact the support twice and in both cases the response time and professionalism were exceptional.

Technical Support:

The quality and expertise of the email support was very high, we have no complaints.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have tried different services in the past, which only offered part of the features, but again New Relic is very different - complete product that just works.

How was the initial setup?

Setting up New Relic is very easy and well documented. It's using the standard operating system packaging tools and is straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it in-house.

What was our ROI?

There is no measurable ROI as we are currently utilising the free plan / option.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user68016 - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
New Relic for PHP: Web Application Performance Monitoring

The performance of a web application plays a critical role in how an application is perceived by its users. It is important to measure it, identify the causes if it changes and react swiftly to any unexpected changes. This article describes an industry leading tool, New Relic, and how it can be used to monitor and improve your site performance.

Setting up a good web application monitoring system can be tiresome, but it’s well worth it. Without the monitoring tools the only thing we could tell is if our site is performing as expected or not. In order to improve the performance we have to be able to identify the worse performing user actions and profile them independently to pinpoint the cause. New Relic achieves that and more in just a few screens, all without manually adding any profiling code to your application.

New Relic is a real-time application monitoring service, providing various metrics about the performance of your production site, covering everything from application database queries through to the time it takes for the end-user to view a page. This data is then collected, post-processed and converted to simple and clean charts presented in the New Relic web interface. Since the New Relic agent has to collect and report the data, it does add some overhead to the application stack. Unless you’re running a service that has to respond in a few milliseconds, however, the overhead added is minimal and is far outweighed by the value of the reports enabling you to detect and solve problems early.

This article covers both the basic functionality of New Relic (that can be used for free) as well as describing what the Enterprise version has to offer.

Getting Started

The New Relic installation is split into several distinct components:

  • the agent component – a PHP extension, which collects the data and reports to a locally running New Relic daemon.
  • the daemon component, acting as a proxy between the PHP agents and New Relic datacenters. The main responsibility of the daemon is to reduce the time of reporting the data to New Relic.
  • New Relic reporting suite – the main New Relic website, where the data is presented for the user.

Both the agent and the daemon components are installed using the provided newrelic-install script. The script will detect the available PHP installations and deploy the agent extension to all of them.

Please refer to the official documentation for more detailed information regarding the installation and configuration of the New Relic package on your specific platform.

Basic Charts

“Forever. Seriously. That’s right. Free. Just the basics.” (newrelic.com)

While the free version of New Relic does not have all the bells and whistles of the Enterprise version, it does provide some basic, yet useful, feedback regarding your site performance.

Application Performance

If you are interested in an overview of how your application performs at PHP level, this is the chart to look at. It displays the average execution time of your PHP scripts in real time, split into separate layers by their execution type:

  1. time spent to execute database queries
  2. time spent in PHP
  3. external web service calls

Depending on which of the application layers take the most time, different optimisation (or scaling) techniques can be applied.

  1. The time spent in the database can usually be reduced by doing one or more of the following:
    • analysing the queries that are executed, ensuring that they are using indexes correctly or creating new indexes for them
    • caching the most frequently-accessed and computationally-expensive result sets from the database
    • optimising the structure of your application’s data using techniques such as database partitioning
    • scaling up the database layer (e.g. adding more slave nodes)
  2. The PHP time is the time that your application is processing the data and good tactics for bringing this down could include:
    • caching intermediate results
    • optimising the code, using faster algorithms
    • adding more webnodes (if the hardware limits are reached)
  3. A few things that can help to optimise the network operations:
    • cache everything that can be cached;
    • introduce an asynchronous job queue if possible.

Browser Performance

Even if the performance of your application is good, there is no guarantee that the users of the site will get it loaded within a reasonable timescale. The New Relic chart for browser page load time provides an overview of how your website is performing.

Similar to the application performance overview shown previously, this chart is composed of several separate layers:

  1. Web application time tells how long it takes for your application to process the requests. More information about this layer can be seen in the application performance chart shown earlier in this article.
  2. Network time is the time that is spent purely for the user request to travel to your application server and then for the response to reach the browser, disregarding the time spent in the application itself.
    To optimise this component one would need to review the network performance of your system architecture by considering the following questions:
    • do you compress the response sent to the site users (depending on Accept-Encoding)?
    • is it just that the response is huge and some of it can be loaded later?
    • is the bandwidth used reaching its limits and you simply need a faster network link?
    • would distributing your servers worldwide (see more on this later) help?
  3. DOM Processing includes the time from browsers receiving the HTML until the DOMContentLoaded is fired. The work done by browsers is essentially a preparation to execute your JavaScript logic, thus, it prepares the DOM structure, preloads CSS (if there are any script tags after them) and JavaScript files.
    To optimise the site performance at this New Relic layer, there are several actions that can be performed:
    • make fewer requests to retrieve JavaScript and CSS files
    • minify and compress JavaScript and CSS files
    • set caching headers so that static files could be cached by the client
    • reduce the number of DOM elements
    • use a CDN for the static files
  4. Page Rendering time is the time a browser takes to download everything needed after the DOMContentLoaded event; this is usually the time when all the images are downloaded. Similarly as for the JavaScript and CSS files, the list of actions available to optimise the delivery of static content includes:
    • optimising image files
    • using CSS sprites instead of multiple images
    • using correct caching headers
    • using a CDN to bring your content closer to the user (there’s also a chart for that, shown later in this post)

An extended list of rules and how they affect your website’s frontend performance can be found at Best Practices for Speeding Up Your Web Site. Also, there are several tools that can help you to analyse the frontend performance such as Yahoo’s YSlow or Google’s PageSpeed.

More information about the Real User Monitoring functionality can be found at How Does Real User Monitoring Work? (New Relic documentation) or How we provide real user monitoring: A quick technical review (New Relic blog).

Throughput Charts

Even if your application is performing very well, it is only performing this way given the request rate at that time. As the number of users on the site increases, new bottlenecks “appear” – which can slow the overall usage of the site or even bring it down. As a result, the rate your application is handling the requests is at least as important as the time it takes for your application to send the response.

There are two separate throughput lines available – one for the browser requests and one the application. The browser throughput tells how many pages were requested per minute. Some of those requests may be served from cache before even reaching the application server, other pages may include additional application requests via Ajax. Thus – the two lines may be completely different and suggest different optimisation targets.

Apdex Rate

In addition to measuring your website performance in time, New Relic provides an Apdex score, which tells how many of your site visitors were satisfied, tolerating or frustrated by the response time of the application.

Once the target times for the browser and application servers are set, it will be used to calculate the Apdex ratio:

  • satisfied requests are all requests that have completed in less than the target time (T), and “pull” the Apdex score towards 1.0
  • tolerating requests are those which have taken more than T, but less than 4*T. These requests are given the score of 0.5
  • frustrated requests are all the rest, and their Apdex score is 0.0

The main difference between using the Apdex ratio and the application response time, is that no one request (outlier) can affect the global ratio more than any other. This makes it a more scientific metric for the global overview of your site’s performance if your goal is to answer the question “what proportion of the site visitors see a page loaded quickly enough?”.

For more information about the Apdex score see the New Relic documentation about this metric.

Worldwide Site Delivery

Is your site performing well for local users? What about the users overseas? The Internet is really fast these days, however it is not instant. The further your user physically is from your servers, the longer distance the information packets will have to travel.

To get a glimpse of how your site is performing for different countries, you could look at the worldwide Apdex chart. New Relic also provides more detailed information for the enterprise customers.

Since the performance problem in this case is usually due to the global network speed, there is no fix that can be applied locally – you’ll need to bring your service closer to the user. Depending on your application needs one or more of the following measures can be employed:

  • use a CDN to serve static files from local servers
  • use local dynamic content caching servers for slower areas
  • implement your service locally for the slower areas

Enterprise Functionality

“The Total Package!”

The basic functionality that New Relic offers for free can give us a lot of valuable insights about the global site performance. We can see what areas need more attention than others and this alone can save some precious time while optimising the site. Yet, it does not provide some of the (sometimes crucial) information; where exactly is the bottleneck?

In addition to the free Lite account New Relic offers two more plans (Standard and Pro) which extend the basic reports and introduce some new ones, allowing you to drill down to the root of performance problems quickly and efficiently.

Application Profile Traces

One of the best features offered to help debug performance problems is the comparison between different web transactions and the ability to see timed application traces of slow calls. New Relic provides charts similar to those described above for each web transaction type (provided that New Relic supports the framework you’re using). Also, a list of slow transaction traces is included with the detailed information.

There are already several tools available to profile your PHP code, such as Xdebug and XHProf. Xdebug is a really powerful development tool as well as offering profiling capabilities. XHProf is simple to configure and relatively easy to use, and there are also companion tools such as XHGui which make life even easier. So what is different about New Relic?

The code profiling trace that New Relic provides is a call tree with only Incl. Wall (absolute and relative) information. This tree alone is not very well suited for a generic code analysis since it does not provide the count of how many times a method was invoked, nor its total time during the application run. The power of it is that it is integrated with all other New Relic features and is easily accessible for a quick review once a slower transaction is detected. In addition to PHP code profiling, New Relic also provides a separate report for slow SQL statements, with their execution times and call counts.

With the help of these integrated traces, finding slower pieces of the application code is a straightforward task, helping to keep the focus on the site as a whole while still being able to detect problems and pinpoint them to the method level.

Compare with Historical Data

In addition to displaying the current state, New Relic also provides a comparison mode. When this mode is turned on, all the basic charts are affected – in addition to the current data they now also provide information from one day and one week ago. This mode is especially useful to show whether the site is performing any better (or worse) than before.

Scalability

How well is your website performing under load? The easiest way to answer that is to look at the scalability chart that New Relic provides. The chart plots the application response time versus the throughput.

This chart can quickly give you an idea about how well your website is responding given that there are a certain number of requests per minute. If the response time is constant as the throughput increases then your site is performing well. However, if you notice that the response time is increasing together with the throughput then it is time to take action. Finding the bottleneck using New Relic should now be an easy task using the database and application code profiling tools described above.

More information about this chart can be found in the New Relic blog.

Final Thoughts

New Relic is an amazing service to monitor your web application. It is simple and powerful – all the numbers are presented in such a way that a quick glance to the chart enables one to tell a lot about the site’s performance. In this blog post we have reviewed the common problems that New Relic can help us to detect and provided several suggestions of how to fix them.

Also, it is probably worthwhile mentioning that while New Relic is very good at what it does, it is a service to monitor your application and it usually works best if combined with a separate system to monitor the server resources or the performance of each service you’re using – understanding how the whole application ecosystem behaves is essential in order to build a stable and well performing web service.

https://techportal.inviqa.com/2013/03/14/new-relic-for-php-web-application-performance-monitoring/

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user4968 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
I’ve used new relic with my rails apps for over a year now and like the service a lot

I’ve used new relic with my rails apps for over a year now and like the service a lot. I recently noticed that they have integration with php so I decided to get the php agent configured on my server so I could get stats on an upcoming symfony 2 app.

I use Nginx / PHP-fpm to run my php apps on ubuntu. The install instructions on the new relic site worked pretty well except for one minor quirk.

I had to install php5-dev so that the new relic install script had php-config to execute to find out information about my install. After that, the install script kept complaining that it could not find a valid php install on the system.

With this particular setup, new relic would look for php in /usr/bin/php (from the php-config script) but that did not exist. There was /usr/bin/php5-fpm and /usr/bin/php5-cgi.

I created a symlink for /usr/bin/php and reran the install script.

Success!

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free New Relic Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: February 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free New Relic Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.