Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user836682 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Project Manager with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Information is now available instantly to managers on all devices
Pros and Cons
  • "Information is now available instantly to managers on all devices."
  • "The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit."
  • "OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information."
  • "Annoyingly, many new Office 365 apps always end up being only US locale for the first year of their life. Microsoft needs to realise that most of their customers are not in the USA."
  • "You still need a bit of expertise to add branding."
  • "The company also needs to make sure that their policies are dictating how information is stored and used, instead of letting SharePoint take control."

What is our primary use case?

Majority of our employees (around 800) all have Office 365 E3 Enterprise licences. Using at first purely email and Skype, we have now created a SharePoint Intranet and all users now use OneDrive.

Teams are now being linked to SharePoint document libraries and embraced by many of our departments. Yammer is now the centre communication tool for company-wide information. We are starting to find the benefits of Power BI, Forms, and Stream.

How has it helped my organization?

It has allowed improved auditing and opened up the cloud. Considerable in-house savings. We are able to add IRM and DLP to company information. This has made the auditors happy.

We have given users a common platform and increased reporting. Information is now available instantly to managers on all devices. 

What is most valuable?

The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit. Teams are now heavily used in how all our departments work.

Skype/Teams are now the main way our company communicates internally. OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information.

What needs improvement?

You still need a bit of expertise to add branding. It is still important to have Super Users to keep moving sites forward. 

The company needs to make sure that their policies are dictating how information is stored and used, instead of letting SharePoint take control. 

Annoyingly, many new Office 365 apps always end up being only US locale for the first year of their life. Microsoft needs to realise that most of their customers are not in the USA. 

Buyer's Guide
SharePoint
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about SharePoint. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
IT Services Manager at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
We use it for storing, collaborating and archiving documents with versioning and custom workflows.

What is most valuable?

I find that SharePoint when used for the right purpose, lends itself to be a fantastic collaboration and workflow service.

It is very easy to store documents, collaborate and archive documents with versioning and custom workflows.

How has it helped my organization?

SharePoint provides a simple way to store documents and we created lots of subsites to contain the courses and materials for our students.

We found that applying permissions were very easy, due to the integration with the Active Directory.

What needs improvement?

It was a shame to see the SharePoint Design being deprecated, as this was a great way to create very customizable workflows.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used SharePoint since the 2003 release, back in the year 2007. We initially used it as a Virtually Learning Environment and a business platform for our college.

We found it simple enough to manage and were able to integrate it with third parties.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There were very few stability issues. The issues are usually related to problems with the related Microsoft stack such as Windows Server/ SQL/ IIS.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

When you set it up as a single server, you will quickly outgrow it. If deployed correctly SharePoint scales very well with the ability to provision multiple web front ends, dedicated reporting servers and SQL clusters. This all helps to remove a single point of failure.

How are customer service and technical support?

As this is a Microsoft product, it can be difficult to obtain direct support. That being said, there is a thriving partner community around this product.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before SharePoint, we used internally designed websites, WordPress and Drupal. We found that they did not provide the collaboration features and integration that we would have liked.

How was the initial setup?

As we were new to SharePoint, we found that the initial process was complex. So, we hired a partner to perform the installation. Over the years, this experience has improved drastically.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

As a an education institution, we had a very favourable pricing policy.

What other advice do I have?

Read and research this subject area thoroughly. Reach out to the large community and visit others that have adopted this solution.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
SharePoint
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about SharePoint. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
IT Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
I like the document libraries, team sites and workflow engine. It could be more intuitive.

What is most valuable?

Document libraries
Team sites
Workflow engine

How has it helped my organization?

Improved collaboration through multi-user document editing capabilities. Improved governance through process workflows.

What needs improvement?

The product could be more intuitive both from an administrative point of view and from an end user point of view.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this for five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We did not have any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We did not have any scalability issues. However, we have deployed a very simple system, with no bespoke tooling or plugins. We have, as yet, not had to scale the solution beyond adding more RAM or disc to either the database or application server.

How are customer service and technical support?

Never had to use technical support from Microsoft for this product.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not have a previous solution.

How was the initial setup?

Setup was complex. Setting up the solution requires a solid understanding of the various architecture options available. While Microsoft has made significant improvements in changing the deployment method so that it is much more guided, decisions taken at the time of deployment can have long lasting detrimental impacts if the decision is not well understood.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Atlassian Confluence (we use both products in house for different things).

What other advice do I have?

Plan thoroughly and well for your deployment and make sure that you understanding the implications of the decisions you make around multi-server implementations for scalability and resilience.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We're a Microsoft partner.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Web Developer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
By using the cleaner user interface, we have managed to assign access requests back to the users.

What is most valuable?

Some valuable features are:

  • The SharePoint document management is second to none. This was one of our main reasons to upgrade from SharePoint 2010 to 2013.
  • SharePoint 2013 had a better and cleaner user interface that has appealed to more users.
  • The improved out-of-the-box Search functionality, was also a driving factor in migrating to SharePoint 2013.

How has it helped my organization?

With the cleaner and friendlier user interface, we have managed to assign access requests back to the users. While our support desk dealt with these requests previously, we have now managed to easily train managers in each team/department to provide access requests easily, thus reducing the load on our support desk.

What needs improvement?

The areas in which this product can improve are:

  • The user experience can be simplified a bit more.
  • The performance and customizability can also be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this product for 12 months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There were no major stability issues as such, but the user profile service stopped unexpectedly on a few occasions.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues were experienced in regards to the scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

Being a Microsoft product that is widely used around the world, the technical support is easily available.

The only problem is when there is any customization done to the default SharePoint tool.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used the older version, Microsoft SharePoint 2010.

Our reason to upgrade was Microsoft decided to stop its support for SharePoint 2010 aand also because our license was soon going to expire.

How was the initial setup?

For someone who had not set up SharePoint previously, the initial setup was somewhat complicating. However, it became very straightforward thereafter.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing and licensing is one of the most crucial parts of using Microsoft SharePoint.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Confluence by Atlassian was the only other option that was considered.

In the end, we chose the Microsoft SharePoint solution because we have a Microsoft Gold membership; so the pricing and licensing was greatly reduced for us.

What other advice do I have?

Try and stick to a vanilla installation/setup as much as possible. When branding your instance of SharePoint, also try not to implement too much of custom codes. The more custom codes you implement, the less maintainable and less migratable SharePoint becomes.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user366102 - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Process Coordinator at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Metadata is easy to index in the research engine. Wikis are limited and hard to use.

What is most valuable?

We are using metadata tags on documentation, indexed research, linked calendar to outlook, and controlled navigation.

We are not using libraries to classify information, but columns linked to metadata (customer, services, processes, and so on). We have generated a true document ID card, and metadata is easy to index in the research engine. We have a “Google-like” page dedicated to research, which includes refinement fields available to help in research.

How has it helped my organization?

We are only using it as a documentation storage system for around 500+ people, so we can find the right document at the right moment, as required. With metadata tags and acronyms, we were able to manage the company terms and create a common basis.

What needs improvement?

Various wikis are very limited; there is no integrated solution for communicators; master pages are too limited and require a developer; and libraries are sometimes useless.

Wikis are not simple enough and too hard to use. There could be auto links, for example, like you can implement in Confluence. A wiki should have an integrated table of contents and auto link to already available terms in the wiki, like Wikipedia works.

An integrated communicator would be an asset. You could use it to ask documentation owners when it will be available in the platform. It would work something like Facebook messenger.

Master pages are just too hard to manage because everything in SharePoint is linked. One level on one page might be a different level in another page; so you need time and failures before you succeed.

In general, it is a good product, but it has limited support and too much expertise required.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used it since 2010. The company I work for has been using it since 2003.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We never had any stability issues. In fact, our system is quite simple. We only experienced downtime three times in six years. This was only due to a VM management problem with human resources.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We did not have any issues with scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

Microsoft’s support is much too expensive and too complicated. We are not using their support at all. We are doing everything internally the best we can.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We tried ShareDrive and Confluence. We stay with SharePoint because of the indexed content and corporate licenses.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was complex. We hired an external consultant to implement the Content Type Hub.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I’ll strongly recommend to adopt metadata solutions, but with a SharePoint expert. This is expensive, but you save a lot of time.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate any other options because of corporate requirements.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend hiring experts and architects and preparing detailed business requirements for them.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Limited
PeerSpot user
it_user11634 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Choosing between SharePoint and Yammer

A caveat before we start: This post is referring to the current release of SharePoint – SharePoint 2013. If you are using SharePoint 2010 or older versions and want to introduce enterprise social networking (ESN) tools, your decision is more straightforward. Use Yammer or an equivalent product such as Jive or Newsgator, or do without until you upgrade.

Here’s the summary:

For organisations already using SharePoint 2013 for content management who want to leverage social networking features…

Use Yammer when: Use SharePoint when:
  • You want to use the superior social networking technology
  • You want a social network spreading beyond your organisation
  • There isn’t a good reason not to
  • You want to avoid confusing users with multiple user interfaces
  • You want to minimise identity management overheads
  • You have compliance needs that SharePoint meets but Yammer does not
  • You want an ‘on-premise only’ solution (and don’t want to use additional products)

Read on for the long version:

Do we have to use Yammer now instead of SharePoint for social activities and news feeds?

It’s a question I have been asked by many clients and event attendees who have invested in using SharePoint 2013 and/or Office 365 since the beginning of the year. The confusion has been caused by Microsoft seeming to be more in love with Yammer than SharePoint of late:

“In my customer meetings over the last few months, people have often asked, “What should I use for social? Yammer or the SharePoint newsfeed?” My answer has been clear: Go Yammer!”
- Jared Spataro, Director, Microsoft SharePoint Product Group1
“OneNote, Yammer, SkyDrive are growth drivers for Office”
- Kurt Delbene, President, Microsoft Office Division2

So the advice from Microsoft is pretty clear. If at all possible, choose Yammer.

There is also a specific reason for choosing Yammer over SharePoint:

  • You want to invite people into the network who are not licensed SharePoint/Office 365 users.

i.e. you want your social network to spread beyond the organisation. You can invite external users to participate in content within SharePoint, but they don’t get a profile or any level of personalisation features. They just get access to the content. Yammer gives every participant a profile and personalisation such as an activity stream of who and what you are following.

But there are reasons to not use Yammer, at least for now if you are using Office 365:

  • Do not want the overhead of maintaining an additional set of users accounts
  • Want enterprise search and Office integration
  • Regulatory issues with using the service

Whilst Yammer is included for free within an Office 365 Enterprise plan subscription, it still has its own separate user identities. There is integration thanks to federated sign-on: logging in to one will also log you in to the other. But it’s still two separate identities to maintain which adds to IT overheads. This is due to be resolved in the Autumn.

The social features within SharePoint are fully integrated with search and Office. This means you can view people and conversations in search results, and can co-author documents direct within the browser using Office Web Apps. None of this is currently possible with content stored within Yammer. Office integration is slated for Spring 2014.

The final key blocker for now is regulatory issues. Office 365 has higher security credentials than Yammer. It goes beyond the basic EU Safe Harbor Agreement to also support EU model clauses which covers additional EU member state data protection legislation. In the UK, that means IL2 accreditation for UK government bodies. At the time of writing, there’s still no comment as to if or when Yammer will be IL2 accredited.

There’s a reason to not use Yammer specifically for on-premise deployments of SharePoint 2013, and that’s simply that Yammer is cloud only, it’s an online service. If you want social networking content restricted to on-premise services, then stick with SharePoint 2013 or use an alternative on-premise enterprise social networking tool.

And finally, there’s another reason to not use Yammer for now. And that’s the ‘keep it simple’ principle. If the preference is to keep the choice of technologies as simple and consistent as possible for users, and you are already using SharePoint sites for content management, then stick with SharePoint unless you have a compelling reason to use Yammer that SharePoint cannot satisfy. Running two solutions that look similar, with some overlapping features but also some fundamental differences, can be confusing and may increase training/support overheads.

Is Yammer the future? Microsoft seems to think so and given they spent quite a lot of money to buy it, you have to assume they are serious. Integration with the other Office 365 services – Exchange, Lync and SkyDrive – is on the cards, along with integration with the Dynamics range including CRM. But enterprise social networking tools are still immature and who knows what the future may hold. I’m surprised the likes of LinkedIn haven’t started to encroach on this space. For now, use the tool that offers the most value for your organisation today. Vendors will say what’s in their interests. That’s not always as in alignment with what organisations need.

References

1 Yammer and SharePoint: Enterprise Social Roadmap Update – Microsoft, March 2013

2 OneNote, Yammer and SkyDrive are the growth drivers for Office – Microsoft, February 2013

3 A short guide to business impact levels – HMGovernment G-Cloud

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Founder & CEO at Solution Enablers
Real User
The workflow is a valuable feature

What is our primary use case?

Collaboration.

How has it helped my organization?

Single window information sharing.

What is most valuable?

Workflow.

What needs improvement?

It should have a lighter interface.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Founder/CEO at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Vendor
There are no happy customers, only happy contractors.

We have used SharePoint for more than eight years.

In the 10+ years of being in traditional IT, I have never once heard of a happy customer of SharePoint, only happy contractors and IT personnel who feel safe in their jobs because SharePoint never quite works. I’ve even tried to find a happy customer. I couldn’t. 

This is probably harsh criticism to some readers, but in my honest view, SharePoint is a system that only really works for IT departments and the contractors who develop SharePoint, because the solution is folded into the existing enterprise agreements. It’s free because it wouldn’t have value on its own. There are no happy customers of SharePoint, only happy contractors.

Let’s talk UX. Employees today have little time for systems that don’t address their needs. If a team needs the ability to share files and that system restricts them, then IT has failed. SharePoint doesn’t really help in today’s world of mobile access, collaboration and sharing of content. 

SharePoint doesn’t provide real workflow so common practices are always having to be redone. This frustrates end-users and always makes IT look less than capable, which is unfair, because it’s SharePoint.

When systems require lengthy timelines to spin up, require additional expert staff to create and then ultimately under-deliver solutions to end users who then feel constrained, force-fed and unable to use the system, then the only conclusion I can make is that the product is sub-standard. While Microsoft has no doubt put tremendous resources into developing SharePoint (and is now saddled with a massive contractor partner channel that refuses to change its ways), the world has moved on. 

SharePoint requires too much administrator-level effort in order to launch. Typical installations of SharePoint require conversations regarding hardware, storage and access permissions which slow business down. SharePoint requires all of these things because the architecture is — in IT time — ancient and inflexible. Once those lengthy conversations are finished then the actual work begins in order to ensure SharePoint can function. This takes business time, money, and contractors are usually very happy in making sure everything is just right. 

Software should not require additional effort to operate effectively. Business should not need additional outsourced expertise in order to get a fileshare running. Then there are the operating concerns of security, governance and collaboration. SharePoint offers only read or read/write ability to files which is far less than competitors offer for a lower price. 

SharePoint isn’t necessarily any more secure than anything else and doesn’t offer the level of governance required for many companies. It cannot report in-depth user activity or provide policy automation out of the box. Ultimately SharePoint offers less than what you need for more than what you bargained.

Competitors are solidly in the market who offer better workflow, security, governance and collaboration. Box.com offers higher degrees of collaboration AND Office integration than SharePoint. 

If you’re a business that needs to collaborate on content, and has the desire to share that content outside your building to your executives on their phones or vendors in other locations, SharePoint is not the solution for you.


Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SharePoint Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SharePoint Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.