Small process tracking for in-house requirements investigations, which are shared across several departments.
Business Analyst, Global IT with 5,001-10,000 employees
Provides combined reports and data with timeline tracking. Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format.
Pros and Cons
- "Combined reports and data with timeline tracking."
- "No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository."
- "Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
- Combined reports and data with timeline tracking.
- Better than looking into three systems to find the full picture.
What is most valuable?
- Metadata store
- Cascade dropdowns for selection of data sets.
What needs improvement?
- Links to Outlook and native storage of emails.
- Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format.
- No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository.
- The linkages to external record stores could be beefed up.
Buyer's Guide
SharePoint
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about SharePoint. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
824,052 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Consultant with 201-500 employees
Full functionality is available from anywhere in the world with a web browser so everyone is always connected.
Valuable Features
The features which are most valuable to us are its powerful search, edit in browser, social features.
Improvements to My Organization
It’s a single entry point to all internal systems with integrated security: no password management issues as with disparate products. All functionality is available from anywhere in the world with a web browser, so everyone is always connected.
Use of Solution
I have been using the solution for 2 years.
Deployment Issues
No
Stability Issues
No
Scalability Issues
No
Customer Service and Technical Support
Customer Service: Customer service is very good.Technical Support: Technical support is very good.
Initial Setup
Straightforward but user profiles take some time to set up.
Implementation Team
We implemented in-house.
ROI
Being able to drop all the cloud service subscriptions saves a lot: the amount depends on how many of those services can be replaced.
Other Solutions Considered
If you’re on corporate Active Directory then there are no real competitors.
Other Advice
Read the planning documentation: running the installer without planning has some disadvantages for auditing, for example.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SharePoint Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Enterprise Content Management Web Content Management Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) Enterprise IntranetPopular Comparisons
OpenText Documentum
OpenText Extended ECM
Adobe Experience Manager
IBM FileNet
Hyland OnBase
Alfresco
Kiteworks
OpenText Content Manager
Oracle WebCenter
Oracle Content Management
IBM ECM
Newgen OmniDocs
Mobius Content Services Platform
Objective ECM
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SharePoint Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the best ECM solution for a midsize management consulting firm?
- Compare SharePoint to Jive as an enterprise content management tool.
- SharePoint Online VS. Jive - which is a better collaboration platform?
- How do Sharepoint and Yammer match up to IBM’s connection solution?
- Would Alfresco give an organization more benefits in terms of cost, features & security as compared to Sharepoint?
- SharePoint versus Alfresco?
- SharePoint vs. Autonomy TeamSite: compare and contrast?
- What is on your SharePoint wish list? What about pain points?
- A recent reviewer wrote about Sharepoint that it has "no password management issues as with disparate products." Agree?
- Microsoft SharePoint vs Internal Wiki - Pros and Cons of Either?
The only functionality I am aware of that needs IE is the server farm SSL security administration, which is a seldom touched highly administrative function; of course IE is the only browser that supports ActiveX so I maybe missing something. I would actually argue that there is improved user functionality in some instances for Firefox over IE, such as the ability to resize text areas.
Regarding the LDAP integration, I have come across people that consider password synchronization to be integration; for me it's SSO and nothing less. To this end there are certainly many systems out there that achieve seamless SSO using SPNEGO Kerberos running off LDAP, but for Claims authentication (SharePoint default) it's a different matter. At best you may be able to use something like PicketLink, Once again, if you're talking Office 365 then it's O-Auth and that's much easier to integrate. Taking this a step further, SharePoint automatically manages password changes for service accounts and provides social functionality such as dynamic organization charts and badging based on AD properties.
I would certainly look at other options, but the bar is set pretty high by SharePoint if you are using Microsoft Office file formats on an Active Directory Network. Also, times change: once upon a time (5+ years ago?) Microsoft held back on browser support, workflow scalability and other features for perceived commercial reasons. SharePoint and Linux - as every decent product should - adapt and grow over time and are nothing like the versions on 10 years ago. What other CMS allows editing DOCX and XLXS in my phone's web browser? Only OX and SharePoint can do that.