Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo

Top 10 Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Alternatives

Vendor: Broadcom
3.8 out of 5
Post review

Top Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers real-time threat detection with a lightweight agent and comprehensive visibility, ideal for those prioritizing ease of deployment. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response provides advanced threat analytics and robust incident response tools, suitable for buyers emphasizing strong customer service and ROI.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
CrowdStrike Falcon setup costs are significantly higher, reflecting its premium service, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response provides a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon setup costs are significantly higher, reflecting its premium service, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response provides a more budget-friendly setup option.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
Symantec EDR excels in threat detection and reporting, making it ideal for detailed insights. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers superior integration and automation, which benefits users within the Microsoft ecosystem. Symantec provides cost-effective deployment, while Microsoft Defender justifies its higher price with advanced capabilities.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, however, offers more comprehensive setup support, making its higher initial setup cost potentially justifiable.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, however, offers more comprehensive setup support, making its higher initial setup cost potentially justifiable.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers excellent value and ease of deployment with strong automated threat detection. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response provides superior threat intelligence and integration with other Symantec products. A tech buyer might choose Fortinet for cost-effectiveness, while Symantec appeals for its comprehensive feature set.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has low setup costs, making it budget-friendly for businesses, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has higher setup costs, which may be justified by its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has low setup costs, making it budget-friendly for businesses, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has higher setup costs, which may be justified by its advanced features.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint integrates advanced network security, appealing for its real-time threat protection. In comparison, Symantec EDR excels in detailed threat analysis and automation, attracting buyers with comprehensive features. Cisco prioritizes performance, while Symantec focuses on intuitive configuration and robust customer support.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has an affordable setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response tends to be more expensive. Users often find Cisco's solution simpler to implement compared to Symantec's, which requires more resources.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has an affordable setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response tends to be more expensive. Users often find Cisco's solution simpler to implement compared to Symantec's, which requires more resources.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Elastic Security stands out for its cost-effectiveness, flexible licensing, and real-time threat detection. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is appreciated for its comprehensive protection and advanced threat intelligence. Symantec's higher price is justified by its detailed reports and superior threat intelligence.
Download Elastic Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Elastic Security has a lower setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is pricier.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security has a lower setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is pricier.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Intercept X Endpoint excels in pricing and support, making it appealing for its cost-effectiveness and customer service quality. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response stands out for advanced features and comprehensive threat analysis, attracting buyers requiring high security levels despite higher costs.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Intercept X Endpoint offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, making it a more budget-friendly option. Symantec's higher setup cost reflects its extensive feature set aimed at comprehensive security.
View comparison
Pricing
Intercept X Endpoint offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, making it a more budget-friendly option. Symantec's higher setup cost reflects its extensive feature set aimed at comprehensive security.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is appreciated for its pricing and support, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is valued for its advanced features. In comparison, VMware is easier to deploy with good support; however, Symantec gives a higher ROI with superior analytics and automated responses.
Download Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has an easy setup with minimal initial cost, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response requires a higher setup cost. This reflects differing priorities in deployment complexity and budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has an easy setup with minimal initial cost, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response requires a higher setup cost. This reflects differing priorities in deployment complexity and budget considerations.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5


The Trend Micro Vision One platform is designed to extend threat detection and response across an organization's digital landscape. It is crafted to deliver advanced threat intelligence, using a layered approach to protect against a wide range of cyber threats.

Download Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Trend Vision One Report
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive integration and low resource consumption. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response excels in threat detection and real-time analytics, providing superior value. Trellix is ideal for cost-effective solutions, while Symantec justifies its price with advanced capabilities.
Download Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a moderate setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response presents a relatively higher initial setup expense. Comparing the solutions, Trellix's lower setup cost may appeal to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a moderate setup cost, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response presents a relatively higher initial setup expense. Comparing the solutions, Trellix's lower setup cost may appeal to budget-conscious users.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels in deployment and ease of use, while Symantec offers superior feature sets and more robust malware detection capabilities. In comparison, Bitdefender's affordable pricing appeals to cost-sensitive buyers, and Symantec's extensive features justify its higher price point.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response. Symantec's solution offers a more affordable initial setup, making it a cost-effective option.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response. Symantec's solution offers a more affordable initial setup, making it a cost-effective option.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Kaspersky excels with robust detection algorithms and quick response times. In comparison, Symantec offers a wider range of integrated security features and advanced analytics. Kaspersky is more cost-effective with competitive pricing, while Symantec provides comprehensive protection, making it a valuable investment.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, making Kaspersky more expensive for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a higher setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, making Kaspersky more expensive for initial deployment.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fidelis Elevate excels in advanced threat detection and integrated responses. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is favored for comprehensive security coverage. Fidelis Elevate is cost-effective, while Symantec's extensive features justify its higher price. Both offer effective customer support, with users preferring Symantec's service.
Download Fidelis Elevate vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Fidelis Elevate boasts a relatively low setup cost, making it an affordable option, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response comes with a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Fidelis Elevate boasts a relatively low setup cost, making it an affordable option, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response comes with a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response integrates well with existing security infrastructure and features intuitive alerts. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response offers advanced analytics, an extensive threat database, and incident response functionalities. WatchGuard's straightforward deployment contrasts with Symantec's detailed documentation and responsive customer service.
Download Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, which requires a higher initial investment for setup and integration.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response offers a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, which requires a higher initial investment for setup and integration.
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure
4.1 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response offers advanced threat protection, real-time analytics, and extensive integration capabilities. In comparison, Sangfor Endpoint Secure is more cost-effective with a quicker deployment process. Symantec provides robust customer service, while Sangfor's pricing makes it an attractive budget-friendly option.
Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, which offers a more affordable initial investment. The higher setup cost for Symantec reflects its extensive features and comprehensive security measures.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response has a higher setup cost compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, which offers a more affordable initial investment. The higher setup cost for Symantec reflects its extensive features and comprehensive security measures.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)