TeamViewer Reviews

We use TeamViewer to offer remote help to customers and colleagues. 

I have been using this solution for about three years.

The solution is very stable. We've never had a problem with it.

Scaling this solution is very easy. There are currently more than 200 users of this solution at my company. 

The initial setup is straightforward and only took about five to ten minutes. On a scale of one to five, one being the worst and five being the best, I would give the setup process a five. 

I would rate this solution as a ten out of ten. 

I use TeamViewer to connect to other workstations, Mac, or PC without a VPN connection. You connect to your client or TeamViewer by a give access code, ID, and password. I can connect to clients and resolve problems on their workstations. I can remote connect to a mobile phone or tablet.

I have been using TeamViewer for a long time.

I would recommend the solution to others.

I have found TeamViewer to be stable.

TeamViewer is a scalable solution.

I have never used the support.

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment is very easy because the client software can be installed in half of minute. You download a few megabytes of the software from their site and set up the installation or run without setup and installation.

I did the implementation myself.

The solution has a pilot feature that is expensive. The overall price of the solution can be cheaper.

We have licenses for three technicians, and all clients in the company were supported. We have three licenses for the IT technician and we support 100 PCs connection when it's needed.

I rate TeamViewer a ten out of ten.

It is generally used for remote control for remote support.

It is fairly feature-rich and stable.

I didn't like the fact that you had to install a client for remote support. If you didn't install the client, you were very limited in terms of what you could do. For a whole enterprise, it is just not an easy task to install a client on everything. Even if you're using SCCM, it is an undertaking. For transient clients that you don't necessarily support a hundred percent of the time, it would be nice to be able to connect to them and support their issues without having to install something on their machines.

In my previous company, we were looking at this solution as being a collaborative tool for the enterprise in terms of video conferencing, calling, and scheduling. They were working on bringing a bunch of products together to make their suite a little more integrated, but it really wasn't at the point where we wanted it to be in terms of integration. We looked at it, reviewed it, and tested it out a bit. We then decided to go with Microsoft Teams. 

It has the clunkiness of having separate modules that aren't totally integrated. There are different methods for doing different things, which makes it a little bit more complicated. There should be the same way whether you are doing remote support or just calls.

I have used it on and off for a number of years. 

It has always been really stable.

I believe it is scalable, but the caveat is installing the client. 

In one of the organizations, we used it for a health system, and we were supporting 16 hospitals. More recently, I used it in a small engineering architecture firm, and we supported a couple of hundred people through six different offices.

Their tech support is really good. They were always very helpful. I would give them a ten out of ten.

If you're going to go with TeamViewer, I would recommend going all-in on their suite of tools instead of trying to do a hybrid model because you always get into trouble with hybrid models for collaboration tools. I believe that integration is the key. The fewer tools you have out there, the less you have to support. Your infrastructure is also less complicated.

I would rate TeamViewer a seven out of ten.

I wanted something which I could use to control other computers over the internet, and then I found TeamViewer, and it worked great. I can control any customer's PC right from my computer with ease.

TeamViewer improved my business because I can help my customer directly from here in very less time.

• Ability to share any files among others
• Easy to use, and has a clean user interface
• Value for money
• Ability to add any TeamViewer ID.

There is nothing to improve; TeamViewer already works perfectly. But still, I think the price factor for small business.

Most of the time, I use TeamViewer. There was some remote work to be done at the time.

We use TeamViewer for remote access. The login uses a key to gain remote control of someone else's desktop.

From my perspective, the most important is the login. That's the most important because you need that key, and everything else.

In my opinion, the user interface is good.

When the application is minimized I often close it in error.

When the application is minimized, I frequently close it by accident, but I'm not sure why; perhaps there is a way to improve the stability of TeamViewer with the minimize or close or not to close it accidentally, and then you must reconnect, and so on.

Unfortunately, I don't know what additional features I would like to see included right now. I only use the main functionality, and it's fine for me the way it is now. I can't think of any new features right now.

I would like to see something like a TeamViewer mobile application for iOS or possibly Android. I think this would be fantastic given how technology is evolving today. It would be beneficial to use it with your smartphone.

I have been working with TeamViewer for a couple of years. I still use it when it is needed.

There are some issues with the stability of TeamViewer.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten.

TeamViewer is easy to scale. It is a scalable solution.

We have two or three users in my department.

I have not contacted technical support.

I stopped using SmartBear, and TestComplete Mobile a year ago. That was a requirement at the company where I now work. I am currently assigned to another project and don't use TestComplete.

I am familiar with GitLab, but with limited experience. I don't have much experience with GitLab. I last worked with GitLab six months ago.

I am currently using some companies in specific test tools. We are developing some test tools at the company where I work, and this was one of them. In the past, I used Selenium mostly for web applications and some other dedicated desktop test tools, but that was also in the past.

I worked with SeleniumHQ a few years ago. Now I only work with dedicated test tools.

In this company, I only wrote a few JavaScript tests.

I have used a virtual machine in the past, but that is different from TeamViewer. I don't recall using another solution before TeamViewer.

From my perspective, the setup is simple enough. It is not complex.

I used the free version of TeamViewer.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate TeamViewer an eight out of ten.

This solution has been really useful when doing product installations and needing assistance. I am able to give remote access to the person assisting me and they can view my operating system. 

Using this solution is straightforward.

It would be useful if the solution could facilitate more than one remote user accessing my desktop at a time. 

We have been using this solution for 5 years. 

This is a scalable solution. 

The initial setup is very straightforward. It took five to ten minutes. It can be done by yourself and there is no technical support needed.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. 

• No configuration required; it starts quickly and is easy to use.
• High security.
• International (more than 30 languages).
• Multi-platform (PC, mobile phones, etc.).

Users can be easily supported remotely.

It would be nice to see TeamViewer load screens faster.

I have used this product since 2009.

I would rate technical support as 8/10.

I’m using two solutions due to company policies.

The initial configuration is very simple. There is no need to be computer literate to do it.

We evaluated RemotePC, Windows Remote Desktop and Microsoft Lync.

Go ahead, it’s the best of all the remote access software products.

• Personal users can use this app for free.
• External cursor view.
• Terminal Services-like services such as use of USB on remote desktop.
• Chat module, to instruct/inform the user on the remote desktop. We don’t have to use an external chat facility such as Skype.
• File transfer for exchanging files
• Scalability. Being able to use it at full screen makes it easier to work in and with
• Remote booting. TeamViewer has a nice utility to remotely reboot a system. So to do that, it's not needed to have someone physically do that at the remote location. During a remote desktop session, you don't want switch back and forth from and to the TeamViewer window. Instead, while you're working, you want to inform, guide or direct someone on the other side to carry out some physical actions you can't do yourself, as you're not there at the remote location, such as shut a system down or pull the power cord out to reset the power supply.

In a Windows environment, you would have to use Terminal Services Server for this.

In the past, use in wireless environments caused buffering due to limited bandwidth.

I started to use TeamViewer in 2008.

I did not encounter any stability issues.

I have not encountered any scalability issues yet.

Technical support is 8/10.

We used Terminal Services Server, which is obviously expensive.

In both personal and commercial use, initial setup was straightforward.

TeamViewer is a professional, flexible solution and platform independent, so it's worth it's price.

I evaluated Terminal Services, pcAnywhere, DameWare, VNC, Windows RDC (professional only).

For both personal and commercial use, if you are looking for ease of use and flexibility, TeamViewer is a good choice.