Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Reviews

We are using it in our school. We are using an old version. It is five years when my contract expires.

It has improved the way our school functions.

I like the record that is being kept and multiple SSDs.

Its price could be improved.

I have been using this solution for eight years.

It is stable. I didn't have any issues with its stability.

We have probably 30 to 40 users.

It is scalable. I need to add a couple more and upgrade to four.

I did not use their technical support.

I didn't use any other solution.

It was pretty straightforward.

It is expensive, but it is a good product.

If you have some money, it is a good thing to buy. It is a trouble-free product.

I would rate Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN a nine out of ten.

The management console is valuable. It helps manage everything.

The solution is limited to Meraki products. It does not extend to Catalyst products. Our customers have a mixture of Catalyst and Meraki products. They cannot manage Catalyst products. Cisco Meraki must improve the integration between its own family of products. It is a disadvantage.

I have been using the solution for two to three years.

The tool is stable. It is quite good.

We work with products like Ruckus, ExtremeCloud, and Aruba Central. Cisco Meraki is easier to deploy than other tools. Cisco Meraki supports both wireless products and switches.

For some customers, Cisco is not the first choice when it comes to pricing. The solution is pretty expensive.

I am a reseller. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We use Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for the wireless network connection inside the company.

The most valuable feature of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is fast and does the job.

The initial setup of the solution can be improved and made easier.

My company has been using Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for three years.

I rate Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN a ten out of ten for stability.

I rate Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN a ten out of ten for scalability. 2000 people are using Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in our company.

The initial setup is complex according to me. We require 12 people to deploy and maintain Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN was implemented through an in-house technical person.

Users have to pay a yearly license fee for the solution. The pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is good.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a very good tool that users can use without problems.

Overall, I rate Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN a ten out of ten.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a wireless LAN solution providing wireless access points for the organization.

What I like most about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is the cloud based management of the entire system. The product was also easy to deploy and easy to troubleshoot.

I haven't really come across anything that was a big issue with this product. I can't think of anything that would have raised a flag about something needing to be improved in Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, but it could be their support. We had some issues, and we couldn't figure out why they happened, but some of their first level support staff does not seem to be well-versed with how to solve those issues.

Nothing really comes to mind about what I would like to see on the next release. I know they are using the six GHz band now for Wi-Fi 6, submitted out as an option, seeing use of the six GHz band down the road for Wi-Fi 6.

I've been using Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for two years now.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a stable solution.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is scalable.

Support for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN needs improvement, as it seems their first level support staff isn't that knowledgeable on the solution, however, their response time on the issues is okay.

We used a different solution before switching to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. We decided to use Cisco products because the Meraki devices were much better than other platforms, particularly in cloud management, ease of deployment, and ease of troubleshooting.

The initial setup for this solution is a combination: it could be straightforward, or it could be complex, e.g. setting it up would've been complex in some situations.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a cloud solution with on-premise deployment, and we did the deployment ourselves, without an integrator, reseller, or consultant. The deployment did not take long.

We tried Aruba, but we didn't get any feedback from the vendor.

We try to have a relationship with the vendor, e.g. we have a Cisco rep for that, but they wouldn't really help us with the Meraki blocks. I'm a network engineer assigned to the company that uses Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN.

We cannot have more than 400 users of this product, and we currently have 200 to 300 people using it. For deployment and maintenance, we only have one staff who takes care of it, e.g. one engineer. We have no plans of increasing the number of users of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, unless we expand in size.

My advice to others looking into implementing this product is that it's definitely a good investment. They just have to be mindful and really understand the technology. They should be able to go through the documentation on the website, to really understand the product features and functionality, because sometimes they may need to exert effort in examining issues on their own, because sometimes support doesn't really provide a proper, tangible response.

I'll give Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN a rating of eight out of ten, because we're very satisfied that it meets all the technical attributes we were looking for, and it's a solid infrastructure. It works with our problems, e.g. any major problems.

I am an electronic engineer and a specialist in Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. I am a distributor of Cisco Meraki and have 100 customers using this solution.

There are many valuable features of Cisco Meraki, including the switches, stacking, and layer 3 routing.

The products are delayed when arriving in Argentina. These delays can be as long as 6 months, causing the customers to be unhappy. I would like to see Cisco Meraki improve the accessibility by region level here in Latin America.

I have been working with Cisco Meraki for the past few years.

The stability of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is great.

This solution is scalable.

Technical support is easy to contact and ready to help.

When you are in the dashboard of Cicso Meraki, you configure the hardware and connect to the internet line and the script will download to the hardware. The deployment is very easy, it is plug and play and takes 50 minutes.

Cisco Meraki requires either a one year or three year license for a standard enterprise license.

This is an excellent product. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is robust and has a tough access point.

I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.

My primary use of this solution is to provide WiFi to users and guests.

The most valuable feature is that the solution is friendly to manage.

An area for improvement would be that Meraki doesn't work well in a warehouse environment. The device is too sensitive to other wireless devices, which provokes noise and can require a reboot to erase this. In addition, the cost of the product could be better.

I've been using this solution for three years.

The stability of this product is good.

This solution has good scalability.

Cisco's technical support is good.

Previously, I used TP-Link, but it's designed for use in the home, so I switched to Cisco, which is a better product for the office.

The initial setup is easy.

I used a partner team to implement, which took around thirty minutes.

My yearly license costs $200.

This is a good solution for the office but not for warehouses. I would give this solution a rating of eight out of ten.

We use the solution for wireless network connection in the organization.

The solution is fast. It is a really good tool, and we do not face any problems with it.

The initial setup could be made easier.

Our organization has been using the solution for three years.

The stability is fine. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

About 2000 employees in the organization are using the solution. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

The initial setup was complex for me.

The implementation can be done in-house. We need twelve employees for the implementation and maintenance of the solution.

We pay a yearly license fee for the solution.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We are using it in a enterprise network, a financial business. Users are completely using it for accessing the servers, internal networking, so the building is completely wireless and the wireless is the main connection to the network, for the gas separate network and for the lease

I like the status page Cisco added that shows you the health of the wireless connection. 

Cisco could add more security features on the other layers, like if Cisco's IPS antivirus could be downloaded. They could also add some more controls for guest access. For example, when you have a captive portal, it would be nice to limit the amount of time users can stay connected per day. Right now, you can only configure the splash frequency. And you can set the connection for one hour, but you have to use the billing feature.

Meraki WLAN is stable. However, some APs that are around five years old have peer connectivity problems.

Meraki WLAN is easy to scale. If it's a small network of around 50 access points, I think one staffer can handle the installation and maintenance. But if you go over 50 access points — about 400 clients — you would need one more staffer.

Cisco technical support goes deeper into troubleshooting than other vendors that I've worked with. They're more superficial compared to Cisco.

The initial setup is easy. If you have an ACP network with internet access, it's just a plugin.

It's a little expensive to use Meraki WLAN. You have to pay for all the licenses.

I rate Cisco Meraki WLAN eight out of 10.