JumpCloud vs Microsoft Entra External ID comparison

JumpCloud and Microsoft are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. JumpCloud is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. Additionally, 100% of JumpCloud users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

JumpCloud and Microsoft Entra External ID are robust players in the identity management and IT control arena. JumpCloud appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive device management and focus on IT control, giving it an edge for organizations with diverse IT needs.

Features: JumpCloud excels in device management, providing single sign-on capabilities and seamless integration with applications like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. It also supports SAML authentication and extensive application integrations. Microsoft Entra External ID focuses on strong single sign-on and integration capabilities, particularly excelling with federated identities and compatibility across various platforms, ideal for hybrid and cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: JumpCloud could improve mobile device management, enhance Microsoft 365 synchronization, and offer more integration features. Users suggest better mobile device management for Apple devices and expanded cloud storage options. Microsoft Entra External ID could work on improving synchronization speed and simplifying its complex licensing model, aiming for better cost transparency and customization options for single sign-on.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JumpCloud uses a predominantly public cloud deployment with strong technical support that's appreciated for responsiveness and helpful forums. However, there's room for speeding up customer support response. Microsoft Entra External ID, offering hybrid and on-premises deployment models, faces challenges with user-friendliness and complex licensing, despite providing solid customer support.

Pricing and ROI: JumpCloud offers a straightforward, competitively priced model, aiming to reduce identity management costs by up to 60% and offering different feature tiers. Microsoft Entra External ID's pricing is tied to Microsoft licensing, which can be complex and potentially costly, although it is well-integrated into broader Microsoft solutions, making it more expensive for extensive use.

To learn more, read our detailed JumpCloud vs. Microsoft Entra External ID Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

JumpCloud vs. Microsoft Entra External ID

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,637 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Featured Reviews

reviewer2701851

Managing Director

Enhances web security with a single pane of glass and flexible deployment

I don't see any need for improvement; one of the really good things about iboss as a company is that they listen to customer feedback. I have suggested enhancements, and they are responsive, making changes for the better, and they do a lot of testing. To improve iboss, although we haven't used it, we considered the VPN solution that comes with the highest tier licensing, which includes DLP and various other add-ons. We prefer using another product which automatically logs you back onto your network when turning on your PC. With iboss, the connection is manual, which doesn't meet our needs. Additionally, sizing can be tricky because, although the initial recommendations may seem adequate, actual usage may require more gateways than anticipated.

Read full review

Arun Jose

System Administrator at Mensa Brands

Unified directory and device management has streamlined remote workforce security and onboarding

JumpCloud can be improved in several areas. Some users feel the initial configuration can be complex, especially for larger organizations, and better guided onboarding could be helpful. Additionally, while its reporting and integrations are strong, more granular and customizable metrics and real-time alerts would be beneficial for advanced use cases. From my team's perspective, there is often a desire for even more intuitive administrative controls, particularly when managing complex policy sets. Enhanced integrations with specific industry-specific applications could provide even greater efficiency. It is about refining the user experience and expanding compatibility. Another area for potential enhancement could be customer support and resources. While generally good, faster response times and more comprehensive or specialized documentation could further improve the user experience, especially during complex deployments.

Read full review

F. Seki

Consultant at Artifield

Offers strong identity unification but needs better customization

Microsoft Entra External ID can be improved with additional features, specifically customizable flexibility and a customizable user interface for the login dialog. Currently, the login dialog has very limited customization options, which only include font styles, colors, text messages, or brand icons. Last month, Entra ID introduced some customizable features in their login dialog, but this does not apply to Microsoft Entra External ID, indicating a significant gap between the two. In theory, Entra External ID can support many external identity providers where custom login dialogs could be integrated, potentially via SSO feature coordination, although I have not yet confirmed this. Hence, enhanced customizable login options and the ability to use attribute password logins are critical features that are required for Microsoft Entra External ID to gain dominance in the authentication market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The security aspect of the solution, particularly the malware behind it, is excellent. That's something that really helped us out. It's not just a simple proxy that just blocks the insights of potential threats that come on behind it. They do malware detection and that helps us a lot."

"I would rate the technical support of iboss a solid 10 without a shadow of a doubt."

"Our primary use case for this product is DLP,"

"Granular setup, which was able to set different levels of filters using the OUs in the AD."

"From a use-case scenario, what I like the most is the plug-in. I like the fact that we can do the filtering of these devices offsite independent of the network they are connected to, and we do not have to have traffic coming back inside our network."

"I would definitely recommend iboss for web filtering purposes to other organizations or individuals."

"First of all, the security policies are essential. I do not have to rely solely on Active Directory for our users."

"iboss is among the few products providing inline filtering where no application is needed on the device. It operates on the network side and is not device-based. This feature was one of the main reasons why we stayed with them for so long."

More iboss pros

"Some of the most valuable features of Jumpcloud have been the use of the policies. They have been very helpful. There are modules in there for policies where you can create your own which indirectly are GPOs similar to what you have for Microsoft environments, however, they are only doing registry changes. They are very powerful and useful. Additionally, having your directory and SSO in one spot is another thing that they provide in application management. Adding, removing, and updating applications are in one place for desktop administration."

"As a cloud-based directory, JumpCloud allows me to integrate nearly every system I have come across that supports SAML 2.0. That's a specific technology that allows different services to integrate for user authentication and identification purposes. That means that with JumpCloud, I can then have one single password. Single sign-on for a particular user that works with VPN, radius authentication for WiFi, logging into Office 365, and their email. Their individual computers use that same password. It's extensible which allows us to tie in customers' security systems. We don't have to provision a new user, 12 different places with 12 different passwords. I only have to create them once and assign them privileges."

"The solution is stable."

"Ability to integrate all applications."

"Azure Cloud services are on time and run well and if we use a JumpCloud, the benefits we receive are the ease of management and the solution is completely user-friendly. End users can do identity management easily."

"The product enables device management."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most impactful feature of JumpCloud is that it allows me to use one credential for all platforms or accounts, reducing the need to remember multiple credentials."

More JumpCloud pros

"When it comes to Microsoft Entra External ID, Microsoft itself is the best distributor."

"Primarily Microsoft Entra External ID SSO is valuable as it works with everything when it comes to integration."

"I have not encountered any stability issues with Microsoft Entra External ID."

"For policy management in my organization, I would say it is perfect."

"The fact that it is quite integrated into the entire Microsoft environment makes it quite easy to use."

"Microsoft Entra External ID offers numerous advantages; there's no need to maintain anything on-premises, which results in a significant IT infrastructure cost saving."

"Microsoft Entra External ID is more secure, offering a secure environment."

"The fact that it is quite integrated into the entire Microsoft environment makes it quite easy to use."

More Microsoft Entra External ID pros

Cons

"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."

"Sometimes, obviously, there are bugs."

"If they could implement an extra security layer preventing access to iboss from the open internet, it would be great."

"The dashboards for local use could be better."

"Our iboss subscription access should be more secure with an OTP or VPN etc. It is easy to gain access if, for example, hackers obtain my username and password."

"SSL decryption: We had issues with learners using apps instead of using web browsers. This type of encryption is tough for any appliance in a BYOD environment."

"Its pricing could be better."

"To scale up, a new iboss Node Blade Chassis must be purchased."

More iboss cons

"Customer service is fairly good, and sometimes it takes a little time to hear back."

"The visual tool and interface must be more fine-tuned."

"Customer support should be enhanced, especially the response time which should be much faster than it is now. I think it is slow."

"I chose to give it a nine out of ten because I see the need for improved security levels in JumpCloud, including more security features."

"The product needs to create its own self-service feature which has been requested by all the admins in the community."

"It could dip into CI/CD tooling as well. That would be a very interesting part to see."

"Support is not good enough."

"A nice feature called patch management with different kinds of licensing is not included in JumpCloud."

More JumpCloud cons

"The quality of Microsoft customer support varies. With an enterprise contract, good resources are usually provided, especially in regions like Saudi Arabia or UAE. However, we have faced challenges with support quality, especially in some subcontinent areas where the resources might not be as experienced."

"There have been a couple of times when it was unavailable because of Microsoft issues, but other than that, I don't remember any problems."

"I would like to see faster synchronization."

"The cost is very high."

"Technical support needs improvement."

"The support engineers are not as skilled as our engineers. When they say something would not work, or there is no solution, we usually hear that Microsoft would not support this."

"I generally find Microsoft solutions expensive, especially in specific offerings."

"Single sign-on for external applications such as Oracle could be improved to be a little bit cheaper."

More Microsoft Entra External ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"The pricing is all on the JumpCloud website. It's not hidden, you don't have to go through a show me a quote type procedure. The pricing is straightforward to understand."

"The cost was around $5 per user per month."

"Licensing cost can be anywhere between $2 and $18 a month depending on what you want to do."

"I rate the product's pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The pricing model changed about 18 months ago. It used to be that you got 10 users free, and then you paid for any user above 10 users. Now, when you go above 10 users, you pay for every user. It has become a bit more expensive, but it's such a good product. When you take into account Microsoft licenses, if you were to run Active Directory, you'd need a server to put it on, or you would need a couple of servers, backup, etc. It's a no-brainer. JumpCloud is so much easier to manage from my perspective, regardless of the cost increase. It's just brilliant."

"We are using an enterprise license for JumpCloud. We have purchased a license for approximately $3,000 a year, but we are charged more than $135,000 annually."

"I am pretty sure that the cost to acquire JumpCloud is less. They have à la carte or per-user pricing. The pricing is there on their webpage. I am not sure if they have any enterprise pricing or discounts if you have more users. But the overall pricing is less than Okta."

"The cost of the solution is approximately $12 per user. However, the cost depends on what modules you're using. They have an all-in-one package and they do have tiers. For example, the more users you have, the cheaper it ends up being in the end too. I know they've done some changes to the pricing model and I haven't been involved in a lot of the licensing lately. I don't know the exact cost at this time."

More JumpCloud pricing and cost advice

"We don't pay separately for Microsoft Entra External ID as it's part of our Microsoft Exchange subscription."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

For zero trust implementation, we encountered complexity issues, especially with a large infrastructure company Exxon...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

Previously when I used iboss, we did the POC for iboss for ExxonMobil. Four or five people wanted to move from our ol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern. There are cheaper alte...

See all answers

What do you like most about JumpCloud?

The product enables device management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JumpCloud?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing can be considered competitive with simil...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JumpCloud?

JumpCloud can be improved in several areas. Some users feel the initial configuration can be complex, especially for ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Entra External ID?

Microsoft is flexible in the pricing for the product, so I cannot say that it is expensive, but definitely they are f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra External ID?

Not really at the moment, but perhaps when we go deeper into using Microsoft Entra External ID, we may experience som...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra External ID?

When I say identity, I mean Microsoft Entra External ID. We have been using Microsoft Entra External ID since the beg...

See all answers

Comparisons

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 11% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Okta Platform vs JumpCloud

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs JumpCloud

Compared 7% of the time

Teleport vs JumpCloud

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs JumpCloud

Compared 7% of the time

Jamf Pro vs JumpCloud

Compared 6% of the time

More JumpCloud Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 17% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 16% of the time

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 15% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 5% of the time

Google Titan Security Key vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Entra External ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

February 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

JumpCloud

February 2026

Download JumpCloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra External ID

February 2026

Download Microsoft Entra External ID product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

Resmo

Azure Active Directory External Identities

Overview

Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.

Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across diverse networks.
SASE: A consolidated approach to secure access.
SSL Inspection: Ensures safe data transmission.
Granular Filtering: Detailed control over accessible content.
Single Pane Management: Unifies control through a centralized console.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with robust features.
Autonomous Operation: Reduces management overhead.
Responsive Support: Provides assistance when needed.
Flexible Deployment: Available for both cloud and on-premises environments.

The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.

iboss

JumpCloud offers efficient device management, single sign-on, and integration capabilities. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, streamlining user management across diverse environments.

JumpCloud delivers device, user, and application management across platforms like Windows, Mac, Linux, and cloud services such as AWS and Azure. Acting as a cloud-based directory, it facilitates single sign-on and identity access management, making it an attractive replacement for Active Directory and LDAP directories. Its policy management and centralized directory simplify user and device administration, offering a user-friendly interface with flexible access control and remote management. Organizations can experience streamlined onboarding and offboarding processes, robust authentication, and scalability. Despite being powerful, room for improvement is noted in alert capabilities, comprehensive MDM for Windows, multi-tenant features, and API reliability.

What are the key features of JumpCloud?

Device Management: Manage Windows, Mac, and Linux devices efficiently.
Single Sign-on: Seamlessly integrate with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace.
Centralized Directory: Simplifies administration by consolidating user credentials.
Policy Management: Enforce policies and provide VPN access.
Remote Management: Provides flexible access control.

Why should users consider JumpCloud?

Streamlined Onboarding/Offboarding: Efficient user management saves time.
Robust Authentication: Enhances security through strong credential management.
Scalability: Adapts well to growing business needs.
Integration Capabilities: Supports seamless connections with cloud applications.

Companies across industries utilize JumpCloud for comprehensive management of devices and user identities. It is especially beneficial in technology-driven sectors where centralized directory services replace traditional Active Directory and LDAP models. Organizations employing platforms like AWS and Azure find it essential for maintaining efficient and secure access management.

JumpCloud

Microsoft Entra External ID, part of Microsoft Entra, provides highly secure digital experiences for partners, customers, citizens, patients, or any users outside your organization with customization controls. Combine external identities and user directories in one portal to seamlessly manage access across the organization.

Microsoft Entra External ID refers to all the ways you can securely interact with users outside of your organization. If you want to collaborate with partners, distributors, suppliers, or vendors, you can share your resources and define how your internal users can access external organizations. If you're a developer creating consumer-facing apps, you can manage your customers' identity experiences.

With External ID, external users can "bring their own identities." Whether they have a corporate or government-issued digital identity, or an unmanaged social identity like Google or Facebook, they can use their own credentials to sign in. The external user’s identity provider manages their identity, and you manage access to your apps with Entra ID or Entra External ID to keep your resources protected.

The following capabilities make up External ID:

B2B collaboration - Collaborate with external users by letting them use their preferred identity to sign in to your Microsoft applications or other enterprise applications (SaaS apps, custom-developed apps, etc.). B2B collaboration users are represented in your directory, typically as guest users.
B2B direct connect - Establish a mutual, two-way trust with another Azure AD organization for seamless collaboration. B2B direct connect currently supports Teams shared channels, enabling external users to access your resources from within their home instances of Teams. B2B direct connect users aren't represented in your directory, but they're visible from within the Teams shared channel and can be monitored in Teams admin center reports.
Azure AD B2C - Publish modern SaaS apps or custom-developed apps (excluding Microsoft apps) to consumers and customers, while using Azure AD B2C for identity and access management.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.

Cars.com, GoFundMe, Grab, ClassPass, Uplight, Beyond Finance, Foursquare

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

JumpCloud vs. Microsoft Entra External ID

February 2026

Free Report: JumpCloud vs. Microsoft Entra External ID

Find out what your peers are saying about JumpCloud vs. Microsoft Entra External ID and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JumpCloud vs. Microsoft Entra External ID report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.