SharePoint Reviews

I use the solution as a document repository to back up personal data.

The solution is easy to use. It worked well for collaboration. People could easily access it. The integration was okay.

I am not a big fan of the user interface. The navigation is confusing. The UI should be more user-friendly.

I have been using the solution for four years.

The tool is stable enough. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The tool is scalable. I have never seen anything go down because of the load. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten. I have never seen the product break down. We have 4800 to 5000 users. We use the product regularly.

The setup is straightforward. It is a website. I had a link to it. I did not have to set up anything. It is all in the cloud.

The solution enables me to access my documents from anywhere.

I will not discourage people from using the product. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.

We use SharePoint to save client-specific and internal documents.

SharePoint has an option where you can open files on the browser, whereby more than five people can make amendments to one Excel online file. The best option on SharePoint is that it can be opened from your desktop. If I map the URL of SharePoint to my desktop, I can see the files on my desktop. That is a fantastic feature I don't see in many other service providers. SharePoint's interface is very good.

SharePoint’s scalability could be improved. I don't know how much an organization pays to scale SharePoint, but I have seen quite a few organizations opting out of SharePoint. The reason may be its scalability or because it is less cost-effective.

I have been using SharePoint for six to eight years.

SharePoint is a stable solution.

My organization is an enterprise business, and half of my organization is using SharePoint.

SharePoint's initial setup is not complex. It's good for any new customer to adapt and understand.

I advise users to think about SharePoint's scalability if they have a huge use case. Otherwise, SharePoint is a good option to save internal and external files.

Overall, I rate SharePoint a seven out of ten.

We internally use SharePoint for all of our document management, and we integrate that with D365. We use CRM and SharePoint to manage our sales pipeline and all documentation related to Sales and subsequent projects are stored on SharePoint. We use the Power platform for certain workflows, for example, approvals of Business Proposals. 

We have created our own custom modules within D365 for our project billing. 

SharePoint allows us to manage the full lifecycle of documents within our organization. 

I do like the collaboration around documents. The versioning history has proven useful in some instances as well. 

It's also very easy to use. I like the fact that we can integrate with various other applications.

For my role, it personally covers all my requirements. 

I've been using this solution for about twenty years. we have always used the latest version of SharePoint, as well as CRM, which is now D365.

I haven't had any issues around that. It's all very stable once it's deployed.

Based on things I've heard, I'd rate it a six out of ten. Just from the feedback I've had from developers working with SharePoint Designer, they do feel that there are some limitations. For SharePoint, most of our clients are medium-sized organizations.

We do most of the support for our clients, but I do know that on very odd occasions, which was a few years ago and doesn't happen as much nowadays because it is more stable, when we have logged support calls with Microsoft, they have always been great. Over the last few years, their support has certainly improved from 14 years ago when support was difficult. I'd rate them a nine out of ten.

Positive

I wasn't involved in its deployment, but I can think back to projects that we have done with SharePoint with customers. Obviously, the project itself will be dependent on how many customizations they need, but they are generally not very long projects. We have had some that are done in two to three weeks including customization and deploying everything. It isn't a difficult deployment process from my experience.

It's a good buy for small to medium businesses that are looking for a basic document management solution. If you have a Microsoft environment, you obviously got the benefit of it natively integrating with the whole Office suite. It's quite easy to integrate with other applications as well, but if you're looking for something more scalable and robust, you may want to investigate other products before making that choice.

I'd rate it an eight out of ten.

We work with the on-premise version of this product at our client's site. The solution is used in specific industries like banks and insurance companies where a local solution is needed to satisfy document storing requirements. 

The organization where the sharepoint solutions are deployed have benefited immensely in terms of the document managment system requirements. Storing all their digital assets in document format. Scanned documents and later use it for reference and legal and regulatory requirements.

Other features being the collaboration, web content management, workflows, analytics available within the product has helped the organization in not going in for separate products. Cost is a big factor when it comes to IT implementations and products usage.

SharePoint has many good features. You can store files of any type, whether office-related documents, videos or MP4 recordings. Metadata can also be stored which makes searching, categorizing and grouping of documents easier. At the same time, the database doesn't take a huge amount of space because documents are on a storage device, unlike other solutions. You can also create forms, have workflows, approvals, scan and upload documents. The solution also has OCR capabilities which are key for the banking and insurance industries. It also has a good forms feature and approval. The DocuWare archive fits very well with that. The solution is cost-effective and has a perpetual license per environment. The product fits neatly within small and medium enterprise banks. It's very cost-effective.

The solution lacks collaboration features so that I am unable to collaboratively create and work on a document with others. The second element that is lacking is compliance or records management so that certain documents, of a legal nature, for example, are only accessible to certain users. I would really like to see that kind of feature.

From a compliance perspective like GDPR  and if the document or data contains personally identifiable data PII data, the SharePoint feature for records management should allow to identify the data being PII data and also provide feature for GDPR wherein the customer is asked for confirmation if needs to be stored and how the data and documents will be used and for what purpose.

If the customer does not confirm should not allow storage of documents and data that contains personal information should not be stored without customers consent. It should allow for archiving feature post the period for which the customer has given the consent for the data and document to be stored  is over should allow to delete the data and document.

Looking for GDPR and other compliance features built into the product as a workflow

I've been using this solution for 21 years. From its 1st version in 2001 till date. We have moved to the cloud version and offering of SharePoint i.e. 0365/SharePoint Online as well.

For a company like ours with around 25,000 users, this product is good and quite stable. We need to explore what happens when the data increases beyond 1 million or 10 million records. At that point, we may need to look again at scalability and what the product can support. They have support for vertical or horizontal scaling. They have a feature where you can increase server hardware, but that needs to be checked. We have two people assisting with maintenance. 

The solution has a good ability to scale up in terms of number of documents and number of users.

Microsoft has the best customer service and support both on web, online, on calls, emails and if you are one of those partners it becomes all the way easy to get the support needed.

Some of our client were first time users of SharePoint so going from no prior system for document storage, collaboration, content management, workflows, application development platform was a boon.

For all of our client who have moved from one version to another version of the product, they always found the product improved in terms of features and functionality and performance.

They have good documentation for deployment so it was quite straightforward. I was involved along with the vendor, setting up the environment, setting up the product, the infrastructure and configuration. We had some minor issues but deployment was quite seamless. It took two or three hours, we had one infrastructure and one technical person working on it, that was enough for us. 

This was implemented using Vendor as well as an in-house team with the client. A kind of hybrid development team created for application development, product deployment and configuration.

I should say if an organization has decided to go for the flagship Microsoft product i.e. Sharepoint, then they should start thinking ahead and plan a roadmap of moving their department applications to Sharepoint and also use the other pillars/features to their advantage the ROI and TCO will be shorten and the organization will gain immensely from early usage of the product for all their development needs.

The license is a one-time cost when you purchase the solution, but there is an annual support fee.

I have worked with products similar to SharePoint such as Documentum, and others. They are heavily loaded with a lot of features, which small and medium enterprise banks, catering to anywhere up to 20,000 users, may not require. 

I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

We use SharePoint for information sharing.

The most valuable feature of the solution is file sharing or information sharing.

The solution should be made more user-friendly for technical and business people.

I have been using SharePoint for six months.

SharePoint is a stable solution.

SharePoint is a scalable solution that supports more than 1,000 users.

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

The solution has good integration capabilities. I would not recommend the solution to other users because it is not easily compatible or operable by everyone. More than 20 engineers and managers are needed for the solution's deployment. SharePoint is a good solution for IT collaboration.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I use SharePoint for collaboration, storage, file sharing, and content management.

The most valuable feature of SharePoint is its ease of use. It's quite easy to navigate through the tool.

The most useful feature of SharePoint is the collaboration part. At any point in time, you know who was working on a document, and you can know which version is actually the latest document in case you want to share it with external parties. If we want to make decisions or talk about information on a document, we know which is the latest and most updated.

When you are trying to migrate from a different platform to SharePoint for file storage, the upload utility should be more flexible, taking more files and then updating you on the upload status of the files you are trying to transfer into SharePoint. This part is quite clunky and could be improved.

I have been using SharePoint for five years.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for stability.

Around 50 users are using the solution in our organization.

I rate the solution’s scalability a seven out of ten.

The solution’s technical support is fine.

Positive

On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the solution's initial setup an eight out of ten.

The solution's full deployment was done by three people in less than ten days.

The solution's pricing is relatively expensive because it's bundled with other products.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six or seven out of ten.

The solution's integration with Power Automate and many other Microsoft solutions has been very seamless. SharePoint is deployed on the cloud in our organization. The solution requires a bit of maintenance, but it's very minimal. Since most Microsoft solutions are now bundled with AI, the turnaround time for searching and indexing has improved. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I have been using SharePoint for over twelve years. 

It's a big solution comprising many services similar to an active directory installation with connections to Skype, Exchange services, metadata services and stuff like that, it can do basically everything you need in order to deliver something like a Twitter website or similar solutions. So I do not think that anything rivals SharePoint on the market. Maybe if a lot of effort is placed upon some WebLogic solutions, this may happen. But, this would need a lot of customizing.

So if you want to have something like a business, or if you want to have something like a product catalog and you are selling something like Amazon, you want to uniquely identify your product like Amazon does it with its ASIM numbers and these to be identified with a name. So the service identifying these unique ASIM in numbers with their names which might be localized in English, German, Dutch or other languages. These are being identified by a managed Metadata service. Amazon does something very similar to Metadata and SharePoint. So, that's the basic technology everyone needs for this web service experience and order to identify the same object with different names.

The metadata services, the WCF service integration and the Voxel feature are three most valuable elements of this solution. The Voxel feature, for obvious reasons, because you want to implement business processes and you do not want them to stop if the machine stops so they have to be automatically started. This is What the Voxel feature in SharePoint does. The managed Metadata allows you to define your own notions or terms denoting notions within your companies. And I if I want to disarm them, or disarm power supplies of different types, I need something to denote the names pointing to entities, any program can identify.

Perceptively it does what people used to do with the pens and pencils, on paper. For Millennials, by taking a note of what to do on the paper or stone or whatever they have been using and let anyone else read it and execute with it. So what any back flow or business process you have did legal one for King Nebuchadnezzar 2,700 years ago or for any business where you are taking a phone call, we two are doing right now and writing down something or I have to remind myself to do whatever and sent that over to pop and be while having receipts from department A and have to digitally sign it and send out the paper. It streamlines everything for us.

All of this business processes, people have been performing solely within their minds. Maybe automatized with the structural feature, but it depends on all the metadata that has been stored within the managed metadata, service, user profile data or whatever. So you can not just say, "Oh, I want to send a car" to whom do you want to send it to. Which car do you want to send? So, all of these parameters have to be stored somewhere else. This is what drives the business process and SharePoint solution allowing you to automatize them.

I would be liking to see the talk features included in SharePoint because Microsoft effectively discontinued this talk and put something like logic apps but only for Azure, and most German companies do not like Windows Azure because they do not want to put that data into a cloud where everyone can see it. So, there's a lot of distrust with Azure environments and you need something to have on premises as a similar solution. And this talk is something like a big playing ground. For instance, if you want to play monopoly and anyone wants to move the pieces but moving the pieces on street A to street B means you are changing your business process from, I have been starting tax declaration, to I've been finding it but not yet sending it out. So, if you wanted to have something like a business process be denoted as a board game, which is what Monopoly did in 1945, effectively.

It is very stable if you know what you are doing and make some precautions. Microsoft lists these precautions, but these precautions are not automatized. It would be nice to have precautions such as: disk size, backup checks, or whatever automized that can be integrated with the SCCM team foundations server.

Well, that's one of the strengths because it not just using soap web services where it sends some XML file to different machines, but it's using WCF, which is a version of a web service, web services being used if you have a different machine where you want to call a function. The type of machines we are using now are invented by Alan Turing, a guy from the hacking Enigma code and Robert Dennard, who invented RAM. These types of machines do not allow you to, all functions on the remote machine. If you want to do that, you have to send a hint which is what web services does.

I have been using the commercial technical support and they're always professional. It's not cheap, but they are always professional. So if there's problems to be solved, Microsoft tops off as excellent.

The initial setup was very complex. We had to keep in mind all of the backup solutions. It is kind of like remodeling a kitchen. You must think of all of the parts, the architecture, the electricity, the air flow, etc.

I think that SharePoint is the best on the market in terms of stability, quality and capability. I also suggest that if a company has chosen SharePoint, the company must have at least a two day training prior to implementation.

The cost is expensive, but worthwhile.

Most departments use SharePoint for their own organizational homepages and their document repositories

It is better than static repositories via shared drives, and better than having to use software that is not mainstream (i.e. Microsoft is very mainstream).

• Its configuration management ability is critical for document-based systems.
• It offers ease of use, which is crucial.
  

• During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty.
• It should have a Google-caliber search ability and a model-based GUI.