Oracle E-Business Suite Reviews

We use it for our interfaces and to run APIs.

The implementation of Oracle E-Business Suite is easy.

They should have a nicer way to handle very high volumes of data because we deal with really high volumes, and sometimes, we end up with performance issues.

I've been using Oracle products since 2005.

Oracle E-Business Suite is currently deployed on-premises, but we hope to move it to the cloud soon.

The stability of this solution is good.

It's scalable. We have hundreds of users.

We have a separate team that manages the installation, and I expect that it was a straightforward process for them.

We have about 15 to 20 people on-site and off-shore for maintenance, deployment, patches, etc.

Prepare yourself before you start the installation because sometimes you can end up in a mess. You don't want to have to uninstall everything and re-install it. So, read the manual carefully, prepare the infrastructure and hardware properly, and then slowly go for the installation and deployment.

Overall, I'd give Oracle E-Business Suite a rating of eight out of ten.

I implement the solution for customers in Saudi Arabia who prefer on-premises solutions.

E-Business Suite is an on-premises solution but you have the option to deploy its infrastructure as a service. For example, we have already implemented Amazon, Google, and Oracle on the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. With the infrastructure, you don't need to have your own data center but you need to have ownership of your database and more. You have options with the solution. You can install it on-premises, host it elsewhere, or place it in a cloud solution like Oracle Cloud Infrastructure as a service. 

The on-premises solution has maturity in features but also flex fields. If you have ownership of a database, you can fully customize and personalize the solution. 

This differs from a public cloud where you are limited in customization such as adding tables or integrating with a third party. 

Improvements could be made in mobility for mobile applications or tablets. The solution still has some web-built pages and Java forms, and Oracle is currently shifting Java forms to be web-based. Once that is complete, Oracle will be accessible from mobile applications and tablets. This is a main difference and strong benefit in comparison to cloud-based solutions like Oracle Fusion. 

I'd like the addition of modern merges and an integration with social media like LinkedIn. 

Minor enhancements in function are sometimes requested and should be implemented. 

I have been using the solution for nine years on and off. 

The solution is very stable. It was created in 1980 and there's a pool of consultants very experienced in working with it so they don't even need to contact support for issues. There are 40 years of knowledge behind it and all issues are known. 

The solution is scalable. 

Customer support is based on the awareness of the person who contacts Oracle. Service requests sometimes loop because Oracle supports the solution at the product level, not the functional level. The product level is any item related to the product itself. The functional level includes change requests or maintenance for the product.  

Neutral

The initial setup is straightforward and simple. For maintenance, two consultants might be needed to address any issues. 

I am a member of the Oracle Implementation Team and implement the solution for customers. 

One of the major issues is that the solution has a high price. 

We evaluate options to determine the best solution for customers based on scope of work. We determine the type of business, requirements, architecture, and streamlining needs. For small to medium companies, we generally recommend Oracle. 

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

We use E-Business Suite for managing finances.

The interface is easy to use. 

The system alerts could be improved.

I've been using E-Business Suite for more than two years.

E-Business Suite is stable.

E-Business Suite is scalable. There are about 2,000 users on average.

Oracle support is helpful.

The cost of the license depends on the price you can negotiate with the vendor. 

I rate E-Business Suite about seven out of 10. My advice for future users is to ensure you get the correct license.

We use Oracle E-Business Suite for our financial modules in our business procurement projects. We are using the team models in our organization.

The use of the Oracle E-Business Suite has kept our organization healthy.

The most valuable features of Oracle E-Business Suite are all the 15 to 20 modules. We use them on a day-to-day basis.

Oracle is continuously evolving with new versions and updates, it is a mature solution.

I have been using Oracle E-Business Suite for approximately 20 years.

Oracle E-Business Suite is a stable solution.

The scalability of the Oracle E-Business Suite is good.

Oracle E-Business Suite is a very mature solution. I recommend it for any organization, medium to large scale organization, it would be the right choice.

I would rate the support for Oracle E-Business Suite a four out of five.

Oracle E-Business Suite requires maintenance.

We have an annual license to use the Oracle E-Business Suite and we have an enterprise license.

We are migrating to the cloud version of this solution in the days ahead.

I rate Oracle E-Business Suite a nine out of ten.

We use this as our ERP.

It is a very consistent product. With a wide range of knowledge base

The solution needs to be updated with modern technology as it currently runs on the Java platform, JRE, which quite running obsolete and requires you to need an NPAPI supported browser to run the tool

I would also like to see an interface that is supported on a tablet or phone.

I have been using this solution for the past 12 years. 

It is pretty stable.

The cloud version is more elastic than the on-premise.

Tech support was very knowledgeable.

It was quite complex to setup, taking about six years. We currently have three employees maintaining it.

We had three partners that helped us with the implementation.

There is an annual licensing fee and you are able to add features depending on the scope of the environment.

Be diligent when reviewing which partner to select.

For us, the most valuable feature is that we have one database, one instance; yet we operate in more than six countries across the world, so it makes it easy for us to run with a very small IT staff.

Its features are good, but I think they need to look around at the other products in the market. There are a few industry standard features which are missing from this product. We are discussing one of these with them where synchronizing calendars across different countries is a big thing.

On the reporting side, they should give financial reports more in AxelBase to filter and sort data to make it faster and easier to close the books.

The other area is definitely the support side. Turnaround time needs to be faster. They need to improve working with the end user, and asking very specific questions to help resolve an issue. People should collect different types of information before sending the problem back and forth.

As a company, we've been using it for five years.

It didn't start that way; but at this point, it's pretty stable. Don’t forget there were improvements in the reporting side, the performance side, and in the UI experience.

I would say that it is scalable.

I have good and bad experiences with Oracle support. Sometimes it's very difficult to open up an SR, to keep it open, and to get a timely answer when you need it. It feels like everything has to be marked severity 1, critical, 24/7: sometimes in order for it to get something done. They might have heard that a lot, obviously.

We often have problems if we have to cross teams. If I have a problem, and then all of a sudden they decide, "That's receivables," so now you have to open a separate ticket with receivables. Receivables work differently than everyone else, so you're going to have to prioritize it higher and make it 24/7. It can be frustrating sometimes that all the support teams don't work similarly.

It's okay, but the real pain comes when you're moving from one area to another. Configuring the APR system is not that easy and it is not easy to get something out of it that you configured. You need to keep on working on an environment’s configuration to bring it up to speed. Now, you're sure this environment is all up-to-date, and everything is working fine. Now, we need to move into the next environment where people are going to test the system.

Currently, there is no automation for migrating an entire configuration to a different instance. You need to manually resolve all the errors. It is very difficult to even identify where and what went wrong. If you are really senior, and you have a lot of experience working on it, then it might easy for you to go and see, "We are missing that."

It would also benefit from a full-fledged comparison when something went wrong. If we could run something that will identify, "Here is the configuration here.This is a mismatch." That would also work well.

• Integration
• Ease of use
• API interface
• Personalization capabilities

The punch-out capabilities to other vendors e-commerce sites for shopping. The county does not need to manage catalogue content. All information is exchanged electronically including purchase orders and invoices, this automation has improved county efficiencies.

Prior to Oracle, the county procurement system was antiquated and individuals typed orders on a typewriter or filled out paper forms. Orders were faxed to suppliers and delivered to a central county warehouse that farmed out orders to departments. The county was dependent upon a 20+ year old mainframe system and there was no integration between the procurement and financial systems.

With Oracle, the county switched from paper-based purchasing to an automated solution which allows departments to place orders and receive within days or a week. The Purchasing department was centralized and allows the county the ability to better manage contracts and negotiate better prices. The purchasing operations were fully integrated with back office financial systems.

Reporting, particularly in the area of public sector encumbrances.

I've used it for 11 years.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

10/10.

9/10 - there is always room for improvement. Occasionally It takes too long to work problems and there is typically an unnecessary long list of information that has to be supplied before the analyst will start work on the issue.

We previously used a custom mainframe solution that was developed in house. We switched because we wanted to leverage modern technology, with a vendor who would enhance their solution, and incorporate new intellectual property through acquisitions and/or mergers.

Oracle implementations are complex and require that the customer understands, and reviews their business processes. Often time it is difficult to revert from one configuration to another. Customer need to wisely consider things like set of books and general ledger account structure and how their business processes align with best practices and what Oracle has to offer.

We used Oracle Professional Services for our implementation. The team was extremely knowledgeable.

While I cannot provide a tangible amount for the ROI, the county has definitely seen a significant return in regards to operational efficiencies.

The county spent $8million on licenses, training, and implementation services. Oracle offers the best deals at the end of their fiscal year in June. The licensing for Oracle is very complex, and it is best to buy only what you need. Oracle, like most vendors, is not amenable to removing products that you are no longer using/need.

The county did look at SAP, but decided on Oracle E-Business.

• Make sure you document and understand your business processes and how they align with the product and best practices
• Ensure that you have a plan for governance and adoption
• Limit the number of integrations and customizations. While Oracle API’s are good, they require strong technical resources to develop. Once developed, they are very stable and require little maintenance
• Make sure you have appropriate support staff. Oracle is very complex and requires a lot of expertise to support and maintain
• Make sure you have a plan to perform and keep up with upgrades. Again, upgrades require a lot of testing and it would be nice to have a dedicated team to work on upgrades
• Look at Oracle’s road map for Oracle E-Business over the years. The strategy and road map keep changing

It handles business application standard functionalities very, very well. It allows for easy customization and enhancements.

Sometimes with Oracle support, depending on the analyst you get, you can hit walls in trying to find answers. But they’ve gotten a lot better, so I hesitate in bringing that up.

About 10-11 years by now.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

8/10.

7.5/10.

Nordstrom, my current employer, didn’t previously use a different solution.

I think we implemented via both vendor and in-house teams, and it's worked fine.

You should research the new cloud capabilities. It’s pretty important and a cost-effective way for a company to install.