Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user584106 - PeerSpot reviewer
HCM Team Lead at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Offers out-of-box headcount and strategic reporting. The Learning module can be used for compliance training and talent development.

What is most valuable?

SF Learning and Employee Central are the most valuable modules in my experience.

SF Learning is a key element in making SF a tool with added value for the entire organization. All levels (managers, employees, HR, interns, etc.) can be involved in these processes and use SF Learning for compliance training, to improve their own skills, and work on their own talent development.

Employee Central is often the first full personnel backbone for a company. It offers all the possibilities to manage employee data, but even more important, it offers out-of-box headcount and strategic reporting.

For companies who are looking for a solution that supports their time registration and payroll processes, the SF solution will have some functional gaps. However, SF Employee Central is fast evolving and these gaps will be closed soon.

How has it helped my organization?

It enables active talent development by the employees, instead of driven by HR.

What needs improvement?

I would like more functionality in time registration, calculation and payroll.

For how long have I used the solution?

I’ve been using SuccessFactors for three years.

Buyer's Guide
SAP SuccessFactors
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about SAP SuccessFactors. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We had stability issues multiple times; sometimes disturbing and in a few cases, it caused blocks for business.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have not had scalability issues.

How are customer service and support?

I give technical support 2.5/5. It takes too long to fix issues and the impact on our business is often underestimated by SF support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using SAP Talent and Taleo. We switched to SF because of the SAP/SF roadmap strategy and insufficient integration options within Taleo.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup was straightforward. We aligned business processes, where needed, to the SF solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Don’t go for the traditional implementation approach with remote/offshore consulting. Use an experienced implementation partner who has enough expertise in HR projects.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Taleo. It had insufficient integration options and was not a full-scope product. We also looked at Workday. It was not a full-scope product and was not localized enough for European HR.

What other advice do I have?

Choose an implementation partner wisely for the long term. One who has a proven record in SF implementations and understands your business. Go for phased go-lives and apply a template for rollouts. Use the momentum to optimize business processes and align where possible to the SF solution. Start this before you start the implementation.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Global Hris Leader , Senior Director at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
MSP
Working with different types of forms in one platform is helpful.

What is most valuable?

Everything in the product is most valuable to us. The flexibility of working with so many types of forms in one platform and also the ability to define different eligible populations for any process are extremely helpful features.

How has it helped my organization?

It is a single platform that the HR team, managers, senior business leaders and employees use to participate in the company's annual processes and that was a great achievement. This also had cost reduction aspects.

What needs improvement?

There should be a single mechanism to manage forms, i.e., to create a template/forms, change/route etc. There is also need for role-based permissions and the ability to add filters in the compensation form.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this solution's components as listed below:

  • Performance: 5 years
  • Goals: 5 years
  • CDP: 1 year
  • Compensation: 1 year

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I did not encounter any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I did not encounter any scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

There is still need for improvement in the technical support; it is not ideal.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, we had used Oracle on-premises for compensation purposes. The reasons why we moved to another solution were its high cost and also since it was a highly customized solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

You should go for the three-year contract.

What other advice do I have?

You need to spend time learning this product at the SAP SF Support Portal. You should also talk to customers who have implemented it before and learn the best practice approach that has been adopted by them.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
SAP SuccessFactors
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about SAP SuccessFactors. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
SuccessFactors Solutions Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
How to Train a Global Workforce Without Breaking the Law

“How am I going to find a system to deploy to 12-20 countries around the world?” Each one has it’s own regulations and requirements for training…”

“I work for a pharmaceutical company? Is there a Learning Management System (LMS) that meets the very requirements of the FDA?"

--

The SuccessFactors LMS answers these common questions by providing features that support US, French, and German requirements. At this point you may also be asking: Does it completely meet the requirements? Does it do everything I ever hoped and dreamed it could do?

Perhaps - I’ll leave that up to you and your legal department.

Let’s go in to a little more detail about how the system supports regulations in the following industries and countries:

  • FDA 21 CFR Part 11 (medical and pharmaceutical companies)
    • E-Signatures
    • Audit Tables
  • French Government and French Work Councils
    • 2483 Reporting
    • DIF Tracking
    • Training Planner
  • German Privacy
    • Deletion of User Data
  • US Federal Government Agencies
    • EHRI
    • SF-182 External Requests
  • Manufacturing and other industries requiring worker qualifications
    • Curricula

US FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Intended to protect the public against manufacturing defects and anomalies in production of medical goods and pharmaceutical products, 21 CFR Part 11 includes regulations that govern the use of electronic signatures in food and drug related industries.

The SuccessFactors LMS implemented two major features to support the regulated medical industry:

1. Electronic Signatures

21 CFR Part 11 requires an additional password when recording learning events. When E-Signatures are activated in the SuccessFactors LMS, users must enter an additional password. This password is used only when recording learning. This comes into play in two situations:

  • Learning is recorded manually - Admins and Supervisors record learning for others and are prompted for the secondary password before learning is recorded.
  • Users complete online training. Typically online learning is recorded automatically. When E-Signatures are active Users must enter the secondary password before learning is recorded.

2. Audit Trails

Companies are audited regularly to ensure compliance, and must produce reports demonstrating that e-signatures are properly recorded. The LMS maintains audit tables on important data including changes to learning history, user, items (courses) and curricula. If an Admin has modified a learning history record, a report will show this change. The following reports are available on audit tables:

  • Curriculum Summary Data Audit Report
  • Item Summary Data Audit Report
  • User Custom Field Data Audit Report
  • User Summary Data Audit Report
  • User Learning Plan Audit Report

French Work Council

The French government as well as work councils in France impose certain training requirements on employers operating in France. Employees must be given the opportunity to complete a certain amount of training each year and the time spent in training must be accounted for. When training takes place outside of normal work hours employers may be required to compensate employees for that time. The French government requires 2483 Reporting, which details the dollars spent on training and the amount of training delivered to employees. A percentage of revenues is collected and applied towards training some of which helps train people who are out of work.

The LMS supports the following regulations applied to companies in France by the French national government and by work councils:

  • DIF Tracking
  • 2483 Reporting
  • Training Planner to forecast training budgets

German Privacy Regulations

The German government requires employee data be deleted from all systems 5 years after the employee has left the company. A process called the “Purge Deleted User Audit History” automatic process deletes user data after X days. The number of days can be set to any numeric value. It is not required to be set to1826 days (5 years), so companies can be stricter than the German government requires. Companies outside of Germany can be less stringent as they are not required to comply with German regulations.

US Federal Government

Support for US government agencies is extensive, as the SuccessFactors LMS is the system of choice for most US federal agencies. Two features in particular were implemented to support the US Federal Government regulations. The requirements were specified originally by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and generalized for companies to use if they wish.

  • External Requests - Originally called SF-182 forms, External Requests provide an alternate way to request and record training by filling out a form that specifies the costs and duration of training - and requires approval from supervisors and other parties before training begins. A verification process is included, which applies an approval process to the verification of training after it has been completed. Typically users in the federal government use this feature to obtain approval for the estimated cost of training and to document the actual costs of training.
  • EHRI - There is an entire set of functionality most people never see called EHRI. EHRI is a specific set of regulations requiring federal agencies report all training data to OPM. The original idea was to provide a single training record for all government employees so that when employees change agencies (very common), the training record remains intact. Two issues were discovered in the implementation:
    • Agencies utilize many different types of systems including major LMS vendors, Access databases, and Excel spreadsheets - integrating this data into one feed with common fields is quite the task and has taken several years (with continuation)
    • Training is not standardized across agencies; while similar training may be offered in multiple agencies and could be considered the same course for qualification purposes, they often have different names and IDs. In addition, it is not clear from basic data how similar these courses may be. The task of determining what training an employee needs based on his/her past records can be difficult until these courses are standardized.

Given all that, EHRI is supported. The LMS supports loading private data including Social Security Number and Date of Birth through a feed from the HRIS directly into the LMS. PII fields are never displayed to admins and users. It is imported through a system interface, stored in encrypted tables, and exported to a standard reported transmitted through SFTP to OPM.

Employee Qualification

One other area to consider is employee qualifications. These may be strict regulations imposed by a third party or they may be internal training requirements that determine employee eligibility to work. Employees not up to date on training may be prevented from doing their job until required training is complete.

The primary feature that supports employee qualifications is Curricula. Curricula were at one time (very early versions) called Qualifications, and some database fields and code still refer to qualifications. Don’t be surprised to find the phrase QUAL when you dig deep into the underlying properties files of the system.

Employee qualifications follow a general pattern:

  • Read a document and verify that the user "read and understood” - at one time this was accomplished with a handwritten signature. Today it is accomplished by pushing a button in the LMS next to the statement “read and understood”
  • Complete training - this training may be Instructor-Led, Online, or both
  • Demonstrate performance on the job - On the Job is a combination of training and demonstration. In some cases it is a hands-on mentoring process, in others it is similar to an evaluation. The application even supports checking off completion of tasks on the job through the “Tasks” feature. Fun side note - this feature works on iPads, so you can walk around the shop floor checking off tasks as they are completed.
  • Manually Record Authorization (optional) - some companies have an admin or supervisor manually record authorization and may enable these people to rescind that authorization at a later date if the employee demonstrates poor performance.

Final Thoughts…

As you can see the SuccessFactors LMS has extensive support for a wide range of both government and industry regulations across the globe. Companies operating in multiple countries should consider regulations when choosing an LMS, and ensure that whatever the choice the system does in fact support the applicable regulations. You wouldn’t want to find yourself in the middle of legal issues and fees now would you?!

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We're a SAP and SuccessFactors partner.
PeerSpot user
it_user516756 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user516756-- at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Real User

Latest version is world's above previous versions.

Renelia Villanueva - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President & Group Head- People & Workplace Management at Alorica
Real User
Top 10
Easily accessible and useful for performance and goals management but not very user-friendly
Pros and Cons
  • "Currently, we are using the performance and goals management functionality the most. It is connected with the enterprise solution, and it is seamless. It can be easily accessed because it is available via the net. It is readily available, provided you have an internet connection. Their technical support is also very good."
  • "It is not that user-friendly. It can be made more user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

We are using it for performance and goals management. We will soon be implementing recruitment and onboarding, and the employee central is also in the pipeline. There is ServiceNow as well, and we're still working with IT about it.

What is most valuable?

Currently, we are using the performance and goals management functionality the most. It is connected with the enterprise solution, and it is seamless.

It can be easily accessed because it is available via the net. It is readily available, provided you have an internet connection. Their technical support is also very good.

What needs improvement?

It is not that user-friendly. It can be made more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for more than a year.

How are customer service and technical support?

We are in constant coordination with SAP Philippines and the SuccessFactors team. We have been coordinating with them since the HCM time. They always provide assistance and support to us. I would rate them an eight out of ten.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate SAP SuccessFactors a seven out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Information System Manager at a non-tech company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Good for management to understand how people are performing
Pros and Cons
  • "The most important feature is the ability to follow up on the yearly performance of the team. It's very good for management to understand how people are performing."
  • "LMS, Learning Management Systems, needs improvement because there were some stability problems."

What is our primary use case?

I use the cloud deployment model. Our primary use cases of this solution is for making a fall schedule, human resources services. We're starting with the objectives, monitoring performance, efficiency, planning, and then management. 

What is most valuable?

The most important feature is the ability to follow up on the yearly performance of the team. It's very good for management to understand how people are performing.

What needs improvement?

LMS, Learning Management Systems, needs improvement because there were some stability problems.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using SuccessFactors for one and a half years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's scalable. We are expanding our business now to 500 employees. Scalability is good. We started with 400 users. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used HCM but I wasn't there when they switched to SuccessFactors. I don't know why they switched. 

How was the initial setup?

SAP implementation is not an easy thing. SAP implementation is an issue.

What about the implementation team?

We used a consultant for the deployment. 

What other advice do I have?

My advice to someone considering this solution is to focus on your business requirements and get yourself a strong, reliable partner. 

I would rate SuccessFactors a nine out of ten. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
SAP SuccessFactors Center of Excellence at Wipro technologies Ltd
Consultant
Top 20
Enables provisioning, job scheduling, and a competency library for import and export. I would like better integration with Employee Central and Employee Central Payroll.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are:

  • Provisioning
  • Job scheduling
  • Competency library import and export
  • Bulk employee export
  • BizX audit report (RBP & employee profile)
  • Candidate merge
  • Cloning company from stage to production
  • Admin user import

How has it helped my organization?

It has improved the way our organization functions as follows:

  • It has a pre-configured master tenant which can run applications.
  • It consumes less time for deployment using SAP methodologies and best practices.
  • It has a quality gate in which they assure quality at the milestone of the project.
  • It can use the same methodology for small, medium, and large enterprises.

What needs improvement?

The integration with Employee Central and Employee Central Payroll needs improvement as the client is still considering on-premises solutions.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have used this solution for over two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have not encountered any stability issues at my level. I only know the Indian market.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have not encountered any scalability issues so far.

How are customer service and technical support?

I would give technical support a rating of 7/10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used the following solutions:

  • Adrenalin ERP: I have used this as a process owner. It is average, with limited ease of use.
  • Greytip HR: This is an average to good solution, but only for small and medium size enterprises.

The main reason for switching into SAP SuccessFactors was for its brand, ease-of-use, predefined solution per business scenario, and agility.

How was the initial setup?

The installation was straightforward initially, but also complex and vast while dealing with data migration and mapping. You need good knowledge of the product.

You need a good background when dealing with MDF objects. You also need the right configuration and an understanding of SAP on-premise for hybrid scenarios.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

If you are deploying SuccessFactors for the first time, the first step is to get clarity from the implementation team on licensed features about any module. Do this before gathering requirements, or before doing iterations, to avoid last-minute chaos.

What other advice do I have?

For enterprises, spend time choosing a product for its suitability as per your business process. Customization is limited in some cases, or inapplicable in other cases.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are partners with SAP VAR and we deal with implementation services in the Indian market.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Founder at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Real User
We use it for quick and dirty solutions as well as complex services.

What is most valuable?

A. SAP is making a firm commitment to creating a new single unified platform for every app it owns, based on the top of Hana in Memory Platform. In the future I aspect HR connected with IOT with Leonardo platform.

B. SAP is asking to professional to rethink HR, less transactional and more "Conversational". In SF, the architecture of the system allows to have very structured vertical functionalities (Learning, Performance, Compensation, etc.), but you can draw new service models using together the individual modules (you can design a “Pay per performance” process for example with Performance Goal Compensation)

C. SAP SF includes libraries of free contents (different data structure in Employee Central according to local laws, competencies libraries, goals libraries, etc.)

D. The usage of HCI and HCP (from HANA Cloud family) will extend the functionality of the product connecting with third-parties software or by extending the features of the individual modules. SAP has created a market place with dozen of 3rd parties apps

E. Artificial Intelligence is the new horizon:

Intelligent Services can automatically connect all actions that the system must take when an event occurs: have a new assignment. In less than two years, SF has released 40 predefined services.

In "Business Beyond Bias" against gender and race discrimination. The recruiting module has a feature that highlights a discriminatory language for example in the job description.

BOT. I saw some test where is possible interact with the system in natural language where for instance you can require to the system a Time OFF and the system will run all the appropriate actions.

F. Collaboration with Microsoft, Apple, Slack

Microsoft, with its technology Azure, is one of the partners to improve the data center services, I suppose also that we will see a better integration with Office world.

Apple, mobile first is the claim, is working to redesign the mobile user experience. At the end of June 2017 FIORI for IOS available.

Slack, we have already discussed about the bot: in the future I assume that the interaction will be made by voice with Siri or Cortana, or Google As.

How has it helped my organization?

We can design a “quick & dirty solution” or “very complex services”, we can manage small enterprise projects (in our experience 150 users) as the big organization (in our experience 40000 users), all with the same solution. This is a big saving of time, costs, and team usage optimization.

What needs improvement?

Employee Central made an incredible improvement, but still is behind the SAP HCM “On Prem” solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

5 years - the full suite. 10+ years Learning Management System module (formerly Plateau Software).

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Not on the platform side. At the end of 2015 there are been issues in the Data Center based in Germany with access problems.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No.

How are customer service and technical support?

On a scale from 1-10: 7/10

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

a. 10 years ago we used SABA, due to a cut costing program they moved all the developers from US to India, the result was a release with hundreds of bugs.

b. 3 years ago we tested Cornestone for a premiere Insurance and we recorded some issues when the new releases went live and a weak technical support service in Europe.

How was the initial setup?

a. Employee Central is critical, you need to have a good experience to work on it. Is very powerful because the choices will impact also on the other modules. We are called to support some projects that were in fact blocked for wrong configurations due to limited product knowledge by other partners.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

a. Price is based on: Number of users and number of modules. Other companies like Oracle or Cornestone are very aggressive, but it’s only is a business practice that cannot go on forever. For instance, Cornestone is under pressure to be sold to investors.

What other advice do I have?

Invest the right time on Employee Central, looking for a competent partner with a proven experience on real projects.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are SF Var, SAP Gold Partner Level
PeerSpot user
reviewer1753278 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Human Resources Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
A strong HR activities solution with an easy to use interface
Pros and Cons
  • "This solution provides up with an easy way to on/off-board staff, as well as actioning internal transfers."
  • "We would like to see improvement in the initial launch of the product, as it is currently quite slow."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution for all required actions around people-related activities, such as on-boarding new staff and transferring internal position changes.

How has it helped my organization?

This solution provides up with an easy way to on/off-board staff, as well as actioning internal transfers.

What is most valuable?

We find the customization of the database to be very useful for our organization.

What needs improvement?

We would like to see improvement in the initial launch of the product, as it is currently quite slow.

We would like to see the addition of a dashboard feature, to enable faster access to regularly performed tasks.

For how long have I used the solution?

We worked with this solution for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have found this to be a stable product; we haven't experienced any issues with performance.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a very scalable solution.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for this solution is good. When we submit a request to them, they provide a timeline for the work to be completed and always come back to us.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

What about the implementation team?

The implementation of this solution was carried out in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This is a more costly solution than comparable products, and training is not available in the open-market, so this has to be purchased separately from the vendor.

What other advice do I have?

We would advise organizations to look into the full costs of this product, including the cost of training their employees to use its features . They should also ensure that they can meet the bandwidth requirements of the solution before implementation.

We would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SAP SuccessFactors Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SAP SuccessFactors Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.