SAP SuccessFactors Reviews

We use SAP SuccessFactors for our performance management, goal setting, performance evaluation, and employee confirmation, e.g. employee letters. We also use it as an employee self-service tool for personal data updates, life cycle events, and learning management.

It's the performance management feature that I find most valuable in this product. As for the product itself, I like its flexibility and configurability. It can handle different types of performance management from one organization to another, and this is one of its best features.

What needs to be improved in this product is the user experience. In general, for SAP products including SuccessFactors, the user experience is not so great, particularly the whole user interface. A lot of new age products beat them on that.

While SAP products are great from functionality and feature standpoints, the whole user experience element is always lacking. That's one area SAP should focus on.

There are other areas where we have not liked SuccessFactors. For example, as a recruitment solution, it's not great for onboarding and exit. Two years ago, we decided to use a different product for recruitment, onboarding, and exit. We're no longer using SAP SuccessFactors for those activities.

I've been using this solution for 10 years.

This solution is extremely stable.

I found this solution absolutely scalable.

SAP has implementation partners, so the technical support is given by the implementation partner. We have not contacted SAP for support, but as far as SuccessFactors is concerned, any product level support and response is very good. It's very well-structured and well-governed. They have a knowledge-rich library that you could always go to. There's also some forums where you can go and ask questions and get answers to your problems. The ecosystem itself is quite strong, including their responses as far as support is concerned.

The decision on which solution to use happened between 2010 to 2011. When we made the decision, it was not with SAP. SuccessFactors was a different organization.

During that time, the reason for moving to SuccessFactors was because we were looking for a SaaS-based product in performance management and there was nothing better than SAP SuccessFactors then.

If I look at the last three, four, or five years, and why we have stayed with SuccessFactors and continued with it, it was because of global scalability. We are a global organization. When you are an India-based company and headquartered in India, the only options you have are Oracle and SuccessFactors.

Performance and talent are the main focus areas for us and even today, SuccessFactors is much better in performance management and talent modules than Oracle, so we've stayed on. The other reason for staying with this solution is change management. Why change unless something is significantly better?

I wasn't there during the setup, but I don't think the setup was complex because there were a few things we've implemented and implementation of those weren't complex.

We have a yearly license for this solution. Any additional costs we pay to the implementation partner, to the support partner, but not to SAP.

This solution is a SaaS. It is deployed on the cloud.

I might have gone to your site out of curiosity, but we already have SAP SuccessFactors. We are using SAP SuccessFactors.

We have 7,500 users for this solution in our organization. We don't need much staff for its maintenance. We are using SAP SuccessFactors extensively. As for plans for increasing its usage, we definitely want to if the business and our headcount grows: We will use it for more users. As of now, no plans of increasing usage of this solution.

My advice to anybody implementing this product is to first have a SaaS mindset. It's a SaaS product, so you can't have an on-premise mindset of "I'll give whatever requirements and the product should do it." Having a SaaS mindset is my first advice.

My second advice is to keep in mind that these products give recommended practices based on which the product is built. If you could tweak your processes to embrace the recommended practices by SuccessFactors, then your chances of becoming successful, or embracing the product is going to be much higher.

My third advice is to stay with SAP SuccessFactors and use all the modules together. For example, there are modules for recruitment or onboarding where you may have certain functionalities missing, but if you could keep as many HR processes on the same product integrated, then the employee experience is going to be much better, compared to trying to use SuccessFactors for a particular purpose, then another product for performance, another product for learning, etc. It's better if you could be on an integrated solution, so your user experience and your adoption at the end of the day will be much better.

I would give this product an eight out of ten rating.

I am using SAP SuccessFactors performance management for documentation.

The most valuable feature of SAP SuccessFactors is analytics.

The price of the solution could improve, it is too high.

I used SAP SuccessFactors within the last 12 months.

SAP SuccessFactors is stable.

I have not used the support from the vendor.

The initial setup of SAP SuccessFactors is easy.

We have not seen a return on investment.

The price of the solution is highly expensive.

I would recommend the solution to others, but the price is too high.

I rate SAP SuccessFactors a six out of ten.

We use SAP SuccessFactors modules. For example, the employee central for employee repository and HR purposes, performance and goal management modules for appraisals, and LMS modules for all learning needs.

What I appreciate most about SAP SuccessFactors is that it has all the modules in one platform.

SAP SuccessFactors is the best option in the market for HR use cases.

I also find the solution user-friendly.

An area for improvement in SAP SuccessFactors is that it has a lot of quarterly updates. Still, the updates need to be more industry-specific because every industry has specific compensation modules. For example, every organization has a different compensation structure and incentives, so the compensation module and other modules still have room for improvement in SAP SuccessFactors.

What I want to be added to SAP SuccessFactors is a chat box where SAP staff can give support to users.

I've been using SAP SuccessFactors for ten years. I'm also implementing it for customers because my company is a consultant for module executions.

Stability-wise, SAP SuccessFactors is still a work in progress, mainly because it has a lot of enhancements required, so my company creates tickets for the enhancements. In terms of stability, SAP SuccessFactors is an eight out of ten.

You can choose to scale up or scale down SAP SuccessFactors nowadays. The solution is much more scalable, so if today you want to start with one hundred users, then tomorrow you want to go up to five hundred, then you can do that. Scalability-wise, I'm rating SAP SuccessFactors nine out of ten.

I'm satisfied with the SAP SuccessFactors knowledge base and support.

Setting up SAP SuccessFactors is easy, and it has zero downtime. It generally takes three months to deploy any talent module or employee central of SAP SuccessFactors.

I'm a consultant for SAP SuccessFactors, which means I use it in my company and implement it. I'm working with the latest version of the solution because my company upgrades it quarterly.

Deploying each SAP SuccessFactors module requires at least one expert, and there can be cross-functional resources, especially for the talent modules. Still, the SAP SuccessFactors employee central needs at least one person dedicated to the project.

I advise anyone planning to implement SAP SuccessFactors to evaluate it first. Ask yourself what the company's requirement is. You need to confirm the requirements and needs of your organization before choosing which SAP SuccessFactors modules to use.

My rating for the solution is eight out of ten.

My company is an SAP SuccessFactors partner.

We use this solution to provide HR application functions.

This solution is very user-friendly, and supports 60 plus languages.

There is not much scope for enhancements, personalization, or customization with the cloud-based variant of this solution, which could be improved.

We would like there to be better integration with this solution and our existing systems.

We would also like the option of whether to implement new features, or not, when they are released.

We have been working with this solution for four and a half years.

This is a very stable solution.

In our experience, this product is scalable and very adaptable.

We have found tehtechnical support team for this solution

Speaker 2:

Because they are responsive, they would be very approachable as well. But yeah, sometimes the SAP case, it goes across multiple geographies, across multiple points of contact, from development team to the product team or to the cross-functional teams. It floats around until a resolution or until it reaches out to the correct point of contact. So considering those cases, it may take a while for them to come up with a resolution for some cases. Otherwise, in most of the cases, pretty much the resolution is maybe in a latency of six to seven days it gets resolved.

Positive

The ease, or complexity, of the initial setup is dependent on the expertise level of the implementation partners, who will need to be certified in at least one module being deployed.

There are standard test cases, test scripts, best practices, implementation metrics, phases, timelines, and the way the project is generally executed. As long as these are adhered to, then the implementation is straightforward, but it is not admin-friendly and cannot be carried out solely in-house.

We would advise organizations that while this is user-friendly, in-house admin teams may find the technical dependencies of this solution to be challenging.

We would also suggest that that anyone involved in the implementation of this software becomes familiar with the best practice for this product, via the knowledge-base articles and help guides provided.

We would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

SuccessFactors is primarily used for employment engagement (e.g. payroll and claims) and to manage HR-related information.

SuccessFactors' best features are talent management and HR Analytics.

SuccessFactors' experience management is not so user-friendly - the launch through the initial dashboard is okay, but when you do a deep dive into certain applications or specific scenarios, the navigation needs to be improved. In the next release, SuccessFactors should include better integrations and reusable plugins. 

SuccessFactors is stable.

SuccessFactors' technical support is responsive.

Neutral

From a technical perspective, the initial setup is straightforward because SAP is engaged in the implementation. But from the customer's point of view, it's a little challenging because it's a new platform, so it requires some training before it can be used. That means that while the roadmap of implementation is six to eight months, there is an additional four to five months of user training.

I'd advise anybody thinking of implementing SuccessFactors to know their target audience and the kind of features they're trying to provide. I would rate SuccessFactors eight out of ten.

We use SAP SuccessFactors for HR.

SAP SuccessFactors improved my organization through automation because it converts all manual processes into automated processes.

What I like most about SAP SuccessFactors are its recruiting and compensation features.

There's room for improvement in SAP SuccessFactors, particularly in terms of innovation. I'd like more flexibility in its functionality and more customization.

In terms of what additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the product, it depends on the module because you have various modules in SAP SuccessFactors, so it's easier to go module by module and understand what features you have in each module. The product has a lot of features coming up, but the product being more mobile, or having mobile features would be nice.

I've been using SAP SuccessFactors for around three years, and I've used it in the last twelve months.

SAP SuccessFactors is a stable product.

SAP SuccessFactors has good scalability, and it's scalable globally.

The technical support for SAP SuccessFactors is quite helpful.

I didn't use a previous solution as an alternative to SAP SuccessFactors. This was my first deployment.

The initial setup for SAP SuccessFactors was not straightforward, but it still depends on your implementation plan, and it's based on your business needs. To be specific, the setup isn't complex or straightforward. It's a combination of both. On a scale of one to five, I'm rating the initial setup for the solution a four. The deployment of SAP SuccessFactors took six months to complete.

My team implemented SAP SuccessFactors, so it was an in-house implementation.

I've seen ROI from SAP SuccessFactors because it converts all manual processes into automated processes, so it gives more flexibility to the business.

I don't have any knowledge about the licensing cost of SAP SuccessFactors.

I'm using the latest version of SAP SuccessFactors.

Around five thousand people use SAP SuccessFactors, and ten to fifteen people handle the deployment and maintenance of the product.

What I can share with people looking to implement SAP SuccessFactors is that it's quite intuitive as it's a cloud solution, and it's also the latest solution and would be great for your business needs. What to keep in mind is that SAP SuccessFactors is also one of the top cloud-based solutions.

My rating for SAP SuccessFactors is eight out of ten. I'm not rating it a ten because there's always room for improvement.

My organization is a customer of SAP SuccessFactors.

We are using SAP SuccessFactors for many of its modules, such as payroll and recruiting.

The SAP SuccessFactors integration with old versions can improve. We are using an older finance module but we are having migration issues.

The problem we are facing is with our employee culture. It is difficult for some users to use the solution. 

I have been using SAP SuccessFactors for approximately three years.

SAP SuccessFactors is stable, we have not found any bugs or glitches.

The scalability of SAP SuccessFactors is good.

The technical support has been helpful.

SAP SuccessFactors is simple to set up.

I rate SAP SuccessFactors a nine out of ten.

I mainly use SuccessFactors as an onboarding solution, and we're also implementing it for compensation and benefits administration.

The most valuable feature is the onboarding module, which enables candidates to fill in their details online and smoothly transitions data from the recruitment module into the SAP database.

SuccessFactors could be improved by making it usable on mobile and making its features less rigid. Right now, if we make a customization and then SuccessFactors issues an upgrade, we get stuck because our customization doesn't come over from the previous version.

I've been using this solution since 2020.

It's stable.

SuccessFactors is scalable.

Accenture gives good technical support.

My company previously used Taleo.

The initial setup was very straightforward and hardly took any time - we were up within a few weeks.

We used Accenture as our implementation partner. Their performance was good, and they continue to maintain the system post-implementation.

We evaluated Oracle Fusion, PeopleSoft Fluid, and Darwinbox.

SuccessFactors is intuitive and easy to use. When implementing, go for all the modules instead of implementing a half-strategy, as this will be better for the company and the employees. I would rate this solution ten out of ten.