SAP SuccessFactors Reviews

We primarily use the solution for many things including performance management, Goal Management, Employee Central, Compensation Management, and SAP Jam, Recruitment, Onboarding.

SuccessFactors has a really solid process for talent management, starting with Goal Management which helps managers and employees build smart goals aligned with business goals. Unique Continues performance management provides another tool for managers to facilitate communication between employees and managers and ensure having high alignment between employees and managers. This helps to have effective performance and better optimize performance process. CPM helps managers to have an accurate picture of their employee's performance to evaluate employee performance all year daily.

From the moment you are evaluating the candidate through recruitment, the process related to review employee performance using Job profile builder will help to have a connecting process between Recruitment and performance.

Having an LMS and Compensation module helps you to have the complete process, where you can use LMS learning to improve weaknesses and reward top performers using compensation.

The performance management and learning management solutions are the product's most valuable features.

There are updates and new tools for measuring employees all the time. There's also a mobile application that can be used by anyone within the process.

Analytic reports are also provided, so you don't need another tool to handle reporting. It has its own dashboard and reporting tools that give you a good overview of everything.

The solution is losing a lot of utilization capabilities because most companies don't function in just one country; they operate in many around the world. It seems to have issues with handling the master data. One module is not the same across all countries. For example, in one case you will see the coverage of all of the localization processes related to the USA, but when it comes to the UK, it's covering maybe 50%. It's worse in other countries. In the Middle East, you might only get 10% coverage, for example. We were surprised at the level of variance from country to country.

The solution needs more localization, especially for the Middle East and Russia and Germany. 

There needs to be more end-user training.

I've been using the solution since 2012.

The stability of the solution is good, but I would not say it's perfect. Sometimes it's not 100%. There are occasions when you want to do some technical updates and it will shut down the server for eight to ten hours. Usually, there will be an agreement between SAP and the customer and we try to shut down the server during off-hours. This means, however, that the availability is not 100%. Still, it is, on average, quite stable.  

The scalability of the solution is good but not perfect. In our company, we have around 200 users and we use it for 16,000 employees. We plan to increase usage to cover 20,000 employees and have plans to roll out the solution to some of our countries in Europe.

The solution's technical support is weak. 

They have not taken care to put in place any certified consultants that understand the system very well to support you when there are incidents. They seem to just add people that are new, fresh, and don't have a lot of information about the system. They don't have the real capability to solve technical issues. It makes the customers suffer.

We previously used Microsoft Dynamics.

The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment times will vary from country to country according to the numbers, but most companies can implement it within three to six months.

You need to have some technical people on your team with you. You need one or two just to hand you each module and to help you understand the standard process so you can deploy and not forget any important features. From the business side, you also need from one to two people to be available during the implementation just to ensure that the user acceptance testing is done very well. It's a good idea to have a consultant visit with your team during implementation to check what was implemented inside of the business processes. They will help you understand the limitation of the space.

You need to have a consultant for deployment. Maybe later on in the process, if you are expanding, you don't need help, but you certainly need a consultant at the beginning.

Without having consultants and partners you will not be able to implement it. There is special access required to get to the backend of the system. We call it the low vision indexes. It's only provided to select consultants. Some features that you want to update also may require access to the provisioning. 

You will probably see an ROI after a year or two. It's great for auditing and there's a lot of reporting built-in so that you can really focus on processes. It will help you reduce manpower which saves money. And, because it can cover and support many companies and countries, it's perfect for multinationals that can now have one overarching system that covers basically everything.

The solution is subscription-based but companies do need to consider other ancillary costs, including upgrades, training, and general implementation costs.

We evaluated Origin and Workday before ultimately choosing this solution. In 2012, Origin was more on the cloud and Workday mostly just covered America rather than the rest of the world. They also didn't have any classes at the time.

We use the public cloud deployment model with SAP as the provider.

I'd advise others to schedule training for the team that will be handling implementation. It's important to have a reference case and go to other companies familiar with your business to check how it was implemented for them and to see how successful they have been overall. They may have good best practices you can learn from. 

Look for a good implementation partner who can take the time to work with you and choose wisely. Some may charge a lot of money and provide low-quality assistance.

You have to know the process before implementation. 

It's important to not purchase the license until you decide what you will use the system for and when you will implement it. It will help you avoid paying for a subscription without yet being able to use it or purchasing too large of a license.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

We use it in our company as an HRIS database for everything related to our employees. It's only for HR purposes, and no one else can access it. So, our colleagues aren't in touch with the data or anything.

It's a bit complicated to make a change in the tool. So, basically, you have to change the position first and then go to the person's profile to ensure the change was recorded there. And if it wasn't, you have to make the change there as well. So it is double work for us. It is time-consuming. Also, if you want to make a change, for example, if you have mistakenly inserted something in the past or inserted it incorrectly, then you need to go back to the exact date when you made the change and make the same change to everything else that has been modified after that specific update. If there is just one issue, then it won't show the correct change.

As of now, I have used SAP SuccessFactors for four months only. I am probably using the solution's latest version. I am a customer of the solution.

It is a stable solution.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I haven't contacted the technical support team. We have a team of experts, so we go to them if we face any issues. So if there's anything that they don't know, they will contact SAP's customer support team. I usually approach our internal expert team.

It is suitable for larger enterprises. I don't think we use it at full capacity. So, we only use a portion of it in HR. The solution can be time-consuming whenever I want to make a change. I would definitely recommend the solution to those planning to use it and be patient when using it. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

SAP SuccessFactors is used as its HR solution, to implement the SuccessFactors.

I implemented SuccessFactors' LMS and provided support and enhancements to Employee Central, Time Management, Recruitment, Performance Management, Goal Management, Reporting, and Analytics.

SAP SuccessFactors, in my opinion, is the best cloud-based HR solution tool for any size business.

Considering the entire suite, Learning is on the verge of many upgrades, but it still needs to be upgraded to such a scale that it almost feels tightly integrated with SuccessFactors because Learning is on Plateau, and SuccessFactors acquired Plateau, and later SuccessFactors was acquired by SAP. Learning is still based on another Plateau platform. Much more progress is required in the Learning space.

Everything, including the provisioning dependency, should be moved to the instance, and coding should be kept to a minimum. Wherever possible, coding should be minimized, and everything should be a drag-and-drop.

UX and UI are already user-friendly, but there are some aspects that require some HTML or XML knowledge. It's not for everyone.

I have been working with SAP SuccessFactors for three and a half years.

SAP SuccessFactors is a stable solution.

SAP SuccessFactors is a scalable product.

Our entire HR solution is built on SAP SuccessFactors.

We are implementation partners. Not only is it implemented in our company, but it is also implemented for others.

I would rate technical support a four out of five.

Positive

NTT Data is a partner for SAP.

Every module in SAP SuccessFactors is complex in its own way. LMS and Time Management, in particular, require extensive configuration knowledge, experience, and hands-on experience. Only certified consultants are encouraged to apply.

If you have a large customer base with thousands of records to deploy, it could take three, four, or four to five months.

Maintenance is determined by the scope of the project. If it is a large company with more than 50,000 employees, 50 plus countries, and multiple locals, then at least four to five consultants are required because configuration changes, support, maintenance, and everything else will be required, and some of the aspects in SuccessFactors require extensive experience, hands-on, and knowledge.

They rely on certified consultants, of which there are two levels of certification: associate and professional. It is best to have a professional certified consultant.

It is not expensive because it is a complete suite with a module-based cost.

I am not sure about the pricing, but I understand it's a popular solution for mid-size, small-size, and large-size businesses. I don't see pricing as a challenge. I would rate their pricing a four out of five.

Always refer to the SAP standard, help guide, and help portals. It is preferred to use certified consultants from the implementation partners because it is very difficult to rework and reimplement once it is implemented and all the integrations are in place. It is better to get it done clearly and sound the first time. It's good. 

I believe that more and more organizations will choose a cloud-based solution.

I would rate SAP SuccessFactors a ten out of ten.

SAP SuccessFactors is used for people management, it is an HR solution.

The most valuable feature of SAP SuccessFactors is that it is a full suite of applications to enable your employees. Additionally, it has good integration with S4 HANA. Our payroll solution is from SAP and the integration becomes much easier when using SAP SuccessFactors.

SAP SuccessFactors' pricing structure could be improved.

I have been using SAP SuccessFactors for two and a half years.

SAP SuccessFactors is highly stable.

The scalability of SAP SuccessFactors is good.

We have approximately 6,000 users using this solution in my organization. We plan to increase our usage as we are a growing business.

Whenever we have an issue with SAP SuccessFactors they respond. SAP SuccessFactors has a well-structured support platform.

We have not previously used other solutions similar to SAP SuccessFactors.

The initial implementation is SAP SuccessFactors straightforward. The full process of deployment took us six months.

We used an integrator firm to do the implementation of SAP SuccessFactors.

We have two to three people managing SAP SuccessFactors.

We are on an annual subscription to use SAP SuccessFactors. The pricing model is something that they could restructure a bit better. If it was based differently on the type of usage it would help.

We evaluated other solutions before choosing SAP SuccessFactors.

I rate SAP SuccessFactors an eight out of ten.

SAP SuccessFactors forms a key tool to our Employee Engagement pillar extensively leveraged by our HR function across the Group. Key processes around Employee Self Services, Learning and Development, Performance Goals and appraisals, Career Development, Succession Planning is run on SAP SF

UX, Intuitiveness of the System, Integration with SAP S/4HANA

SAP is heavily invested in bringing new features and functionalities in SAP SuccessFactors with every release. Integration with the core financial and HCM / Payroll systems is very critical. This is the area where SAP can leverage its own product portfolio like S/4HANA and provide a much seamless integration

I have been using SAP SuccessFactors for approximately four years.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I have found SAP SuccessFactors to be stable.

SAP SuccessFactors is a scalable solution.

We have 5,500+ employees using this solution in my organization.

We have had large-scale implementations of SAP SuccessFactors. The implementation is neither easy nor very difficult. If it's done right it can be easy and seamless but there's quite a lot of effort that is required. You need experts to do it.

The implementation lifecycle can be further reduced.

You require experts to be able to implement this solution.

An average 4-8 certified Consultants support with the Business as Usual activities

SAP SuccessFactors requires an annual subscription.

I rate SAP SuccessFactors an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for the performance management system. Under the performance management system we monitor the target, the objective of the employee, and have the assessment on the employee as well as the final result in order to track employee performance.

The performance management system of SuccessFactors is very valuable. We can set the goals and then the business process flow.

We can have goals reviewed and approved and then we can submit them to the system. We can review things and get self-assessments. Managers can add comments.

We can track and measure our goals from mid-year reviews to progress. We can calculate excess money in relation to goals and can self-calibrate. Overall, it's excellent performance management. 

The deployment process is easy.

The business processes on offer are excellent.

The solution needs to offer more languages. Many in Indonesia, for example, are not so good at English. In this product, English is the default language. We need to translate it to our main languages, which is difficult. 

The pricing of SAP is quite high.

It would be good to have tutorials for employees. If we had something to distribute to them to help with a general understanding of the solution, it would be quite helpful.

I've been using the solution for around two years or so.

The stability of the solution is very good. I don't have any downtime and the solution offers very good availability. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable. 

The scalability of the solution is quite good. It can provide services to many companies and many business units.

In Indonesia, we have 250 employees that are on SuccessFactors. Globally we have about 4,000 users, however, I can't speak to how or if it is used elsewhere.

Currently, the solution is only for the supervisor, manager, and the head of business. However, we are considering expanding to more staff in the future.  

In Indonesia, we mostly deal with Hong Kong. There's a team member in Hong Kong that works closely with our SAP consultant. I'm not sure of how responsive the consultant is as I don't deal with them directly. However, our project manager is quite good and understands this product well. When there are issues, he usually can handle them.

While I only have experience with this solution, in the last company I worked for, we also use OrangeHRM.

The initial setup is easy, however, we need to explain to the employee about the process of the performance system due to the fact that, for the most part, they don't know how much is processed in their performance management system. We'll give direction and then it's easy for them to handle. We'll also follow up to make sure they understand and everything makes sense. 

It's my understanding that the licensing is paid on a yearly basis, however, I cannot speak to the cost. The project manager handles that aspect of the product.

It's my understanding that SAP as a solution is quite expensive.

I did evaluate other options. Typically, I look at local offerings. However, due to the fact that our company is multi-national, I've only really looked at SuccessFactors for this particular work. We don't really have the capacity to decide locally. 

We are using the latest version of the solution. 

I would recommend the solution to other users.

The main pain point, however, is the price. It may be why not all employees in Indonesia end up using it. However, the business processes are very good.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We're mostly quite satisfied with the solution and its capabilities. 

I am a consultant, and this is one of the solutions that my company is currently implementing for one of our clients.

This solution is used for performance management. It can also be used for forms that people have to sign, and it does the validation. You can print documents that have all of the information populated from different business applications. It allows you to manage all of the people without a headache.

This solution contains several features related to performance management. It allows you to record achievements and feedback, and create monthly reports. 

This is a public cloud deployment model.

The most valuable feature of this solution is the performance management module.

The reporting is very good.

The GUI needs to be enhanced to be in line with the latest and complete version of the solution.

We would like to have more information on integrating this solution with other systems, such as financial solutions.

The predictive analysis functionality should be expanded to offer more recommendations.

This is a stable solution.

This solution is more scalable than other solutions because of the features that it offers.

This solution has very good technical support. They are very professional, and we have a good relationship with them.

The initial setup of this solution is not complex at all. It is very easy. If we have any issues then we can ask technical support for an answer.

The length of time for deployment depends on the customer and their environment, but I expect that it takes four months at the maximum. For our client, the deployment took approximately three months, and four people were involved. One or two people are sufficient for maintenance.

We are implementing this solution for our client.

The licensing fees are based on the number of modules that are being used, and the number of users. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

Many features and improvements have been announced for the next release of this solution. For example, there are many new integrations, including the ability to work with Excel files.

My advice for anybody implementing this solution is to plan ahead based on the organizational structure, and implement it one or two modules at a time.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We use the private deployment model of this solution. 

It was much easier than the previous system. It made things a lot easier and operations much smoother.

The best models we used were the Goal Management and Performance Management. They were the most useful. We use three modules in our company, the Goal Management and Performance, the Talent Acquisition, and there's the LMS, the training. The best features that were working well for us was the Goal Management and Performance Management. They were the most valuable to our organization.

They should improve the reports. We had a problem with the reporting. If we compare it to Oracle products, Oracle has much more comprehensive and a better reporting system all in all. They really should work on the reports and making it more user-friendly. There's room for more customization in the reporting. This is the feedback I received, that the main edge that all Oracle products have is the reporting system, which is the main reason why I'm using the system in the first place.

In the next release, I would like for them to make the system have a slot for regular, back and forth feedback. It should have a feedback form on the system. 

It is stable. We haven't had any problems. 

Scalability is good. We can easily expand it. We were able to integrate it with a couple of our systems.

We were not happy with their after-sales support. Whenever we had an issue it was really difficult to get in touch with them. There was a problem with asking them about a feature or other things. They weren't as responsive as we would have hoped. During the installation of the system, they replied 24/7. However, after we deployed the system, it was not that easy to get a response.

We previously used Oracle. We switched because SAP is much more user-friendly. We weren't using Taleo or Fusion, we were using Oracle Basic. SAP was user-friendly for our employees.

The initial setup was straightforward. SAP was really supportive during this time.

We used a consultant for the deployment and they were very supportive during the time. 

I would advise someone considering this solution that they need to really look into their requirements and be very specific regarding the requirements when getting their orientation on the system and creating the requirement documents. They really need to to be very specific and very detailed in their requirements. Make sure to understand all the features and capabilities of the system.

I would rate it a seven out of ten.