SAP SuccessFactors Reviews

I have the longest experience with a module named SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting (RCM), which was five years ago. My company is currently in the process of implementing the rest of the modules of SAP SuccessFactors in our company.

Presently, the most valuable feature of the product is related to the recruitment module that the product offers since it is a module that I have recently started to use. I feel that the product has improved, and the tool has introduced AI to help with areas like job description. The tool is also integrated with Microsoft Teams, which helps with the scheduling of interviews. The most recent features introduced in the product have been very valuable.

Compared to the other tools in the market, I feel that SAP SuccessFactors should improve more in the area of employee experience (EX) in the cloud, where there are some shortcomings.

The product doesn't have a modernized look and is not very user-friendly like other products. In the future, the product needs to have a more modernized look, and it should be made more user-friendly.

I have been using SAP SuccessFactors for four years. My company is a customer of the product.

All my company employees, including around 2,000 people, will start using the product in April.

I have contacted the technical support for the solution. The response from the solution's technical support was fast. The solution's support team has been good so far.

My company chose SAP SuccessFactors over other products in the market, considering the system's capabilities to meet our company's requirements.

The solution was deployed over a period of six months.

The product is expensive. The product is worth the money you pay for it.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it because it can be used in big companies with a lot of complexities since it is a flexible product that is scalable. For big companies or global organizations, SAP SuccessFactors is good.

Considering the flexibility of the system and its ability to accommodate complex business processes, the product is ready to be used in multiple industries.

I rate the tool a seven to eight out of ten.

We use Performance and Goals Management and the Succession and Development modules.

The performance is okay. The reporting and analytics feature is very important for decision-making. The product helps with our company’s compliance and regulation needs. The tool has a unique talent management platform. It is responsive. It provides evaluation, recruiting, learning and development, and compensation processes. It is easy to navigate through the platform.

The Onboarding module must be improved. It doesn’t have many features.

I have been using the solution for three years.

The tool has good scalability. Our clients are medium-level businesses.

The technical support is slow. We generally have low and medium-level incidents. I rate the technical support a three or four out of ten.

Negative

The initial setup is easy. The deployment takes two weeks. The product is deployed on the cloud. We use a public cloud provider.

We do implementations. I will recommend the tool to others. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We implement our employee centers with core employee data using the solution. It integrates and stores employee profiles, and our foundation objectives.

The solution's most valuable feature is the metadata framework. It's a good idea to implement such a powerful tool. It is better, easier, and more flexible.

Whenever I have to enable a feature fully, finding the document for guidance to know about that specific feature becomes difficult. Sometimes to activate or enable a particular feature in my instance, I have to enable more than one feature in provisioning. I always face issues in getting the documents or references from SAP itself.

They should include professional documentation. They keep making changes, and incorporating them into documentation needs some time. They should work on a faster way of locating a proper documentation as well. 

Last year, we went for the solution's learning hub professional and support edition training. We gained basic knowledge of the solution and transferred it to our internal team. We have been accelerating the learning internally for SuccessFactors integration since then. We also have a testing environment where we are already testing our cycles and succeeding in the initial data migration.

It is a scalable solution.

The setup was straightforward. Also, SaaS has made a lot of things easier. I rate their implementations as eight out of ten. They have a powerful learning hub. I respect the way they clarify their system and explain their processes.

I do recommend SAP as a solution. I studied SAP in college and have ten years of accumulating knowledge in the ERP field. SAP has succeeded in being number one in the whole world. They have their philosophy about business. They have standardized a lot of business processes and business terminologies. They have succeeded in sustaining a powerful system supporting their philosophy. I rate it as a ten out of ten.

We have a separate ATS, which is currently being integrated for managing external candidates. Internally, job posting is already integrated. We also use it for performance management, compensation benefits, feedback, and reporting. It's a one-stop shop including for our various vendors who provide support in terms of learning, our talent marketplace for internal mobility, etc. We are customers of SAP. 

The solution is very intuitive. Many of the things we need to do are easily accessible. There is support in the form of chatbots. Before we implemented SuccessFactor, it was very difficult for us to implement use of the feedback section. That has now become very intuitive, and usage has increased. The solution is stable and robust. 

Many organizations are very relationship-driven and we're lacking information regarding how to build a network; what you need at what stage of your career journey or employee journey.

We've been using this solution for three months. 

The solution is stable. 

The scalability is good. 

Customer support are reasonably responsive. 

We previously used PeopleSoft and the extra we get with SuccessFactor is access to support using chatbots. 

We are a large organization and implementation has been a massive project. All our resources went into it and it's been a very complex process. We're still having some teething issues that the team is working on. Not all the issues are connected to the solution but in the context of an organization operating in a highly regulated area, the financial industry, and in 60 countries, it's a complex organization. Any solution will be difficult to implement. We had external assistance for the implementation. 

I think this is a good product and rate it eight out of 10. 

I use SAP SuccessFactors for various HR applications, including payroll, HRIS, onboarding, recruiting, learning management, talent management, and other HRA applications.

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration capabilities with on-premise ERPs and other systems. 

One area for improvement is making SuccessFactors more compatible with other countries, especially in terms of payroll and other functionalities.

I have worked on 15 projects with the product. 

The solution is stable.

My company has 300 admin users and 200,000 employees. The product is scalable. 

We've encountered issues with connectivity, integration, and occasional service downtime, leading to ticket submissions.

Neutral

The tool's deployment is complex due to various dependencies. The steps included user training, documentation, configuration, and aligning training for end-users. Around 25-30 resources were involved in the deployment. The overall deployment rollout takes two days to complete. If it is a complex project, it can take around four days. 

I recommend carefully considering other products before committing to a big ERP system like SuccessFactors. Once implemented, switching can be challenging, so it's crucial to assess the real need for such a large system. I rate the product a seven out of ten. 

We are using SAP SuccessFactors for our mandatory training.

SAP SuccessFactors is working on making beneficial changes but they are not fast enough. They can improve by making the improvements or updates quicker. Additionally, the user interface could improve, it is not something you want to return to when compared to a solution similar to Instagram.

I have been using SAP SuccessFactors for approximately three years.

SAP SuccessFactors is a very reliable and stable solution.

The scalability of SAP SuccessFactors is good. They are many modules that we could use. For example, they have the Employee Center module where we can expand our employee information, such as which skills we have and career aspirations.

We have approximately 20,000 employees using this solution in my organization.

We plan to continue to use the solution in the future. We do not have plans in our roadmap to change solutions.

I have not contacted the support from SAP SuccessFactors.

I have previously used Saga People, which is a learning platform. It's not the same as SAP SuccessFactors, it does not bring the same capabilities.

The implementation of SAP SuccessFactors is highly complex.

We are a pharma company and in this domain, it's very important to have mandatory training. All the inside notes and email that has been sent to the employees are very heavy and it's not easy to modify them because it's part of the suite. It is very complex to use. It's not easy to change things and if you would like to change things, we need to wait six months. We can wait for a long time, and if there are not any other customers that need the changes we will not receive priority.

We used a third-party integrator in Israel named AKT for the deployment.

This is a very heavy solution suitable for large companies, but not agile enough for my design needs to bring learning for employees.

I rate SAP SuccessFactors a six out of ten.

Our organization uses SuccessFactors for employee management. We can look at the organization's structure to find vacancies that need to be filled and training records for courses that must be completed. The company's reporting structure is also fully available on SuccessFactors. All the reporters under me and their user credentials are available as a workflow in SuccessFactors. We have more than 1,800 employees in our region, so everybody uses SuccessFactors to view the organizational structure and complete mandatory training courses. 

The feature I like the most is the notification bar where we can see upcoming courses that the organization requires from time to time. It's easy to track any pending courses. I also like the search feature in SuccessFactors. We can search for newly available courses that are updated in the system for completion.

I find that the website sometimes has problems loading, but I'm unsure if it's an issue with SuccessFactors. After the login, there are some connection issues. We get some errors telling us that it cannot connect to the host.

I have been using SAP SuccessFactors for a year.

SuccessFactors is a stable product. When a new employee under me joins, I get an email notification from SuccessFactors. The push notifications, etc., work seamlessly. I don't have any complaints about stability. I never experienced any delays with any push notifications or important organizational structures.

I rate SAP support eight out of 10. I had to raise a ticket once because I was unable to complete a course on time. The "complete" button was invisible. The SAP SuccessFactors team had implemented a change. 

The company switched to SuccessFactors worldwide, so all the local branches adopted it.

From a user's perspective, setting up the account was easy. We received the credentials when I joined the organization. We only had to fill in the credentials and get started.

I rate SAP SuccessFactors nine out of 10.  I would recommend it. SuccessFactors does its job. We have a few important things that we need to do. One critical thing is completing the mandatory course. These courses cover essential IT changes and job skills. These courses need to be completed in a timely manner.

From a user perspective, everything is straightforward. After login, we can easily navigate to any of the pages we need. The organization structure, salary details, and training records are all available as drop-downs on the home page.

We use most of the modules for performance goals, recruitment, employed central succession planning, and salary review STI. We'll be using additional features going forward. We are customers of SAP and I'm head of HR tech and operations. 

The best feature is that the solution has an open architecture and provides an open platform so it can coexist with other systems. It allows for a different goal setting system, but still integrates well. SuccessFactors also integrates well at the backend with your core SAP which is also a benefit. My sense is that in the future the solution will evolve into a model similar to Salesforce where you have the core platform from SuccessFactors and plugins for everything else. 

The downside is that SAP resources are expensive and not very common from a tech stack point of view. Anything you want to change or any customization is expensive. Our user experience is not great and we're looking at building a privileged user experience layer on top of what exists.

I've been using this solution for four years. 

In terms of system stability, data integrity is good.

The solution is scalable. 

The technology is changing quickly and the solution requires support but it's not forthcoming. They say, "This is the product, now you figure out what to do with it." Every time we upgrade or implement something, we have to rely on our internal resources, even if we're willing to pay for support. AWS and Microsoft have advisory units that invest in employee-customer success but SF has nothing like that.

It's a good setup but with emerging solutions like Darwinbox, I think there might be challenges ahead because of the user experience and that will dominate things in the next few years. 

ROI depends on your business case. If you're coming from an SAP SCM or IBM implementation, then the return on investment is very low. You won't have a strong business case to move from platform A to platform B because transition costs are three to four times the license fee.

It's important to be clear about how you want to spend your money. No more than 60% should go to the licensing fee because there's a lot of additional work required to get a great user experience and have good infrastructure. You will need interfaces, integration with third-party tools, enhancements, and the like. I would also recommend building some in-house capabilities for platform administration and small modifications. Figure out how you'll interface with local platforms, payroll, time management, etc. They're going to decommission the on-premise version soon so explore their future plans. It may take a couple of years to complete implementation and you need to know where they'll be at that point. 

I would give a higher rating if the user experience was better but for now I rate this product eight out of 10.