Zoom Reviews

We are a market research firm.

We use Zoom for a few instances.

I used to use Zoom on a regular basis for meetings for both my business and my office work. However, as the project has evolved over the last three years, we are focused on Microsoft Teams.

It would be 70% to 30%.

It was similar to password-based security when connecting to anyone. When a large number of people join in, there is a lot of noise. Random people become accustomed to receiving these invitations. They can also join without invitations, as they used to. As a result, there was a lot of noise earlier. Right now, I'm not dealing with that problem. But, in and out, there may be a few security web issues with Zoom.

I'm not sure if it makes a difference, but connectivity frequently drops when we are connected to Zoom compared to other logins or chat boxes. We are dealing with that issue. The voice quality could improve, and there are issues with the background.

I believe the background has changed in the last two to three months, or even in the last year. In Teams, we have the ability to change our own backgrounds. We can get a background that is unique to us. I believe Zoom does not yet support this feature. Or, if it is enabled, it is not functioning properly.

Its background does not function properly.

Noise cancellation should be available. Both noise cancellation and voice cancellation should be included. The number of people who attend the interviews or webinars, combined with those who join in suddenly, creates a lot of chaos. That can be minimized. Background options, such as customized backgrounds, should also be provided.

I have been working with Zoom for three and a half years.

I'm not sure what version it is, but I recently updated to the latest version of Zoom.

Stability is always an issue with Zoom. I am not sure if it's going well right now or not because I'm only using it 30 percent of the time. I am not sure if they are on the right track with stability or not.

When I used to connect, it felt a little that if you are a paid Zoom user, you can invite as many people as you want to that meeting. However, if you have a free version, you can only connect a limited number of people. I believe the maximum number of people is 15 or 25.

That makes sense because if it's paid, then you have a lot of security policies in place. which is good for data security and network security because you have a passcode that is being generated. However, if you have the free version, you do not have a passcode. That is open to everyone.

I have some experience with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery.

I don't have much experience with technology. But, I have worked with cloud-based technologies. On the basic front, I have the knowledge.

We are a firm. We use the Amazon cloud for everything, including data storage and other things, but I'm not an expert in that area. That is the IT person who will be in charge of that. I don't have any direct experience with the Amazon cloud. That is entirely handled by the IT department.

We are using Microsoft Teams and Zoom. We primarily use Teams for communication.

When compared, I believe Microsoft Teams is more stable than Zoom.

With new features come new services in the Teams. And because we use Outlook, we are linked to a variety of other services. We can connect to users using various other services or various apps. We can work on a variety of other things when we are connected to Teams and directly connected to Outlook. 

When we are connected to Zoom, and we want to schedule a meeting, we must log into Zoom separately and then connect to the meeting, or we must schedule a meeting.

The initial setup is straightforward.

There are both free and paid versions available.

I looked into CloudEndure Disaster Recovery for a project that required a few bits of data here and there.

We had a business relationship with Zoom, we were partners.

I would rate Zoom a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for digital meetings. 

We usually record the calls, the meetings. It's great for that. The recorded file is very quickly delivered to us.

It's a quick product. It's fast.

It meets my needs. It's good, in general.

The initial setup is easy.

I can't speak to any missing features. I just do basic calls and haven't had issues.

We've used the solution for a while at this point. We've used it since around the start of the pandemic, or thereabouts.

We have found the solution to be stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

When it comes to having meetings or webinars, it's been scalable. It seems to expand to our needs. We've never had any issues. 

I've never had a problem with any of the technology. Therefore, I haven't had a need to contact technical support. I wouldn't be able to rate their services, having never contacted them.

A few times when I have had calls with WebEx. It's not my primary tool. My primary tool is Zoom.

Previously, we had other tools like GoToMeeting.Since the start of the pandemic, we have been using Zoom.

We currently also use Meet alongside Zoom.

The initial setup of the solution is very easy, very straightforward. It's not very complex or difficult. 

I'm just a customer and end-user.

We tend to use the latest version of the solution.

I would recommend the solution. I'd advise users to try it out. It's very good.

I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

We use Zoom for internal and external meetings. 

Zoom's drawing tools could be better integrated. 

We've been using Zoom for about two years. 

Zoom is stable. 

Zoom is scalable.  We have about 10,000 users at my company. 

We used Webex in the past. 

Zoom is a cloud service. I think we only have to pay for the license. 

I rate Zoom nine out of 10.

The product is one of our prime platforms for delivering remote services.

The main feature I like with Zoom is that it allows me to do remote control and get access to the system so I have remote hands that I don't have to depend on the customer or the client to do things for me. They just give me access and I would be able to do what I need to do. That's one of the good features there. It also allowed me to easily transfer files back and forth.

The solution is very user-friendly.

The solution is easy to scale.

As long as you have good connectivity, the stability is good.

The initial setup is simple. 

If a user has bad connectivity, Zoom will not work well. 

I can't say anything is lacking. Overall it's pretty sufficient. 

They may need to scale it some more in terms of global users. 

Stability is pretty good, and the performance is decent. However, it's very dependant on the connectivity If the connectivity is poor, the stability won't be so good. 

Scalability is possible with oom. It's not a problem to expand it as necessary.

When we do training, we can add quite a bit of people. We've never had an issue during training sessions. 

Right now, everybody in our organization uses Zoom.

We've never needed the assistance of technical support Everything is pretty straightforward. The solution is problem-free.

I'm also familiar with Microsoft Teams. Given what it is now, Zoom is pretty different from stuff like Teams. Teams is very corporate and as far as remote control and stuff are a lot more restrictive. It's not as user-friendly when coming into those types of things.

I'm just part of corporate. I don't know the exact cost of the license. I can't really speak to that.

I don't know what version I use is. It gets updated every time I use it, therefore, it is likely the latest version.

Zoom is the way to go. I haven't had any issues with it.

I would rate the solution at a ten out of ten. 

The video side should be improved, especially if too many people log in at once. While they say that the solution can support up to 100 connections simultaneously, it slows down once 20 or 25 people join. So too, the quality of the audio decreases and this is in spite of one being in a good internet area with good network speed. 

For the moment, Zoom only allows one to schedule, so it would be nice if it offered the option of creating channels, such as Slack does. The latter solution allows everyone to be on the same call with just a click. 

I have been using Zoom for two-and-a-half years. 

Zoom comprises our main mode of video communication. We have slowly started incorporating Microsoft Teams, since the company, our employees and the back office use this. Consequently, it is sometimes easier for us to simply conduct a quick call. 

I rate Zoom as a seven out of ten. This is because it is much easier to use than Microsoft Teams, but both of these solutions face similar issues when too many people log in at the same time. In fact, Zoom rates slightly lower than Microsoft Teams in terms of video and audio quality when too many people, 20 or 25, log in at once.

Zoom only allows for scheduling at the moment, so it would be nice if it offered the option of creating channels, such as with Slack. The latter solution allows everyone to be on the same call with just a click.

I believe we deploy the solution on the cloud. 

Half of our organization makes use of Microsoft Teams and the rest use Zoom. 

I rate Zoom as a seven out of ten. 

I generally use Zoom for meetings when presenting to potential customers. It's a good way of being able to present information. I own the company and I'm a customer of Zoom. 

It's great that I can see people when I'm talking to them, it's really important to have that feature and to connect to clients. I also like the ability to share graphics; the ability to go through a PowerPoint presentation or share other visuals is very important. Beyond that, I know there are lots of other capabilities that we haven't used very much.

There are sometimes too many parallel meetings going on and the system gets overloaded, somebody drops out or we have to start over again. That's something that could be improved. 

I'd like to see 100% reliability in the solution. I also find that the controls are a little awkward, but that's a minor point. It's really the consistency and the reliability that are the big issues.

I've been using this product for a year. 

It's a stable solution most of the time, but I think it's dependent on the number of users at a given time. Too many users and you can have some issues. 

In general, the solution is scalable although there are occasionally issues when meetings are conducted in parallel and we might lose a connection.

I've made one or two calls to customer support and shared emails with them so it's been quite limited. I got a reasonable response, they were pretty decent.  

I think the main thing I would suggest is to get some kind of assurance that there won't be overload problems. I believe one of my clients has some kind of arrangement or package with them and we've never had a problem on any Zoom meeting with this client. 

I find that I can have more meetings and greater effect using Zoom. I've had many live meetings and conference calls over the years. It's difficult to connect with clients on a conference call. Zoom makes meetings as effective as a live meeting or close to it.

I'd rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

We use Zoom for virtual meetings. We have 250 people in our company using Zoom.

This is a cloud solution.

The video stream is very cool, and it's an efficient solution.

It could be more user friendly, like having permission to share documents quickly with other users.

It's a heavy application that requires a lot of bandwidth. I would like to see Zoom incorporate those features where you can share documents and form teams while still maintaining efficiency.

We have been using this solution since 2019.

The solution is stable.

It's scalable.

Before using Zoom, we used Cisco Webex. Compared to Microsoft Teams, I see Teams as being very heavy. I see it as a solution that was developed in a rush. It's just too heavy if you don't have the bandwidth. It's not as efficient as Zoom.

Zoom gives you the experience of seeing the other person who you are conversing with, even though the person is remote.

Installation is very easy.

We did the installation ourselves.

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. 

I recommend this solution. It's very comfortable and easy to use.

I primarily use it for myself and for checking. I use it for organizing teams. 

The performance is very good. We haven't had any stability issues.

The scalability is great.

The product is usable and very straightforward. 

Overall, the installation process is very simple. 

There is a free version of the product.

I don't think any other improvement is required at the moment.

You do need permissions to be recorded. I'd like to have the recording functionality in the free version so that we don't need any licensing in order to access it.

The free version allows only for approximately 45-minute meetings.

They need to be able to integrate it with other applications, such as, for example, Facebook, so that you could schedule meetings more effectively.

I've been using the solution for three years. It's been a while at this point. 

The solution is stable. The performance has always been good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. it's reliable. 

I've found the solution to be scalable for my purposes. It's never been an issue.

I do not have plans to increase usage at this time. 

I don't really require the assistance of technical support. Having never talked to them, I cannot speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

I use both Zoom and Google Meets. The quality of Zoom is better than Google. That said, Google Meets is pretty commonly used. 

The installation process is straightforward and not overly complex. You just click through the prompts and you are ready to go. 

You can handle the installation yourself. It's very easy. I didn't need an integrator or consultant to assist me. 

They have options for personal use, or we can have co-hosts, which we can assign.

The licensing is cheap and we can pay for it on a monthly basis. 

I use the free version. I don't pay a licensing fee at this time. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. Overall, I am satisfied with the capabilities of the product.

I would recommend the solution to other users.