Webex Reviews

I use Webex for having meetings in the cloud. For example, sometimes I use it for technical reviews with my team, and sometimes, I used it for education.

The most valuable feature is the remote control. I can share my screen, or control other PCs, which are very good features. I can do all of this from home without having to travel.

Webex is easy to use, even for people who are just learning it. They can join meetings or share content with the click of a link.

This solution would be much better if we could install an endpoint and have centralized management. This would allow me to subscribe, push an endpoint to the client, and then control these points.

I would like to see the inclusion of security agents, for example from McAfee or Symantec, which can scan the communication for threats. This would help avoid problems if a user has malware on their machine. Webex would also be able to scan for malicious files.

I have been using Webex for three years.

The stability is very good and Cisco is doing a great job with it. We use it on a regular basis.

This is a scalable product. In the past three years, I have not faced any issues related to scalability.

I have been in touch with Cisco support and they are very good. For enterprise-level organizations, I find them very good.

I have also used GoToMeeting and Zoom. I found that Webex is easier to use than these other products.

This cloud-based solution is very easy to install, with only a single click.

My advice is simply that if this product fits the requirements then people should just start using it. It is very easy to use and can't be complicated, even for non-professional users. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for voice calls, desktop sharing, and sharing drawings or texts for presentations.

The solution is useful for communication. It provides the basic features available in other products.

The solution is heavy and slow. It takes too much time to open. It is a bit old. I do not feel comfortable using it.

I have been using the solution for six years, but not frequently.

I rate the stability a five out of ten.

The initial setup was easy.

Microsoft Teams and Zoom are better than Webex. Webex is pretty slow compared to Microsoft Teams and Zoom. Microsoft Teams is also a bit heavy and slow. I like Zoom. I feel more comfortable using Teams and Zoom. I have been using them for a long time.

We use the solution rarely. I use Webex only when our partners ask us to join meetings through Webex. I might not be comfortable using Webex because I do not use it frequently. Our organization takes care of our security needs. Overall, I rate the product a four out of ten.

We use the solution for multiple purposes, including collaborative meetings and online education through web events, seminars, practical sessions, and lab sessions.

The solution provides a secure environment for meetings. Along with this, its feature for conducting exams works the best. In addition, it helps the instructor to monitor student engagement during online educational sessions.

They should integrate the solution with multiple hardware vendors.

I have been using the solution for more than ten years.

It is a stable solution. I rate its stability ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability ten out of ten.

Technical support is optional for the solution as it is never out of connectivity or has latency issues.

I have used Zoom and Microsoft Teams before. In comparison, Webex provides additional features and a standard license policy.

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward. 

The solution is low-cost for a hybrid model.

It is a unique solution. I rate it ten out of ten.

I use it for virtual meetings.

It is useful for me for having meetings with others and working well remotely.

It is very powerful and stable.

When I use it personally, not in my enterprise, there is a time limit of about 60 minutes. After one hour, the call gets cut off. This limit should be increased.

I have been using this solution for about three years.

Its stability is good.

It is 99% scalable. All employees in our company are using this solution.

I don't have any experience with their support.

It is easy.

I can set it up myself.

I would rate it a nine out of 10. It is perfect for communicating.

Using it anywhere on any devices.

Having the quickest meetings ever.

Overall collaborations.

I have used it for one year.

No issues.

No issues.

No issues.

A 10 out of 10.

A 10 out of 10.

Jabber. It was less flexible, which is why we switched.

The initial setup was easy and quick.

It was implemented through a vendor team. I would give them a 10 out of 10.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

We use the product for attending training webinars, meetings, and team collaboration.

The product's most valuable flexibility of features is particularly in terms of the user experience, from joining meetings to the controls available during the meetings. We can easily manage the audio-visual aspects as well.

There could be a feature available to record the meetings.

I have been using Webex for half a year. At present, I use the latest version.

I rate the platform's stability a ten out of ten.

The number of times we use the platform depends on a particular virtual event. It varies from every day to once in a week or month. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

We use different webinar platforms, including Webex, Teams, and GoToWebinar, depending on the organization's needs.

Compared to Teams, I rate Webex's initial setup process a ten.

Webex has enhanced the remote team collaboration process regarding time management and cost savings. The whole platform works well in terms of productivity. Its integration with other tools has improved workflow efficiency.

It is an easy-to-use tool with lots of reliability. It should be considered by every potential user looking for a meeting platform.

I rate it a nine out of ten.

We use Webex for conferencing.

The most noteworthy aspect of Webex is its quality, which I found satisfactory without any notable issues.

In terms of features, it would be beneficial for Webex to focus on improving its chat functionality to make it more user-friendly. Additionally, enhancing communication operations to create a friendlier user experience would be advantageous. Other individuals who have tried using it faced challenges when attempting to share content with third parties during conversations or meetings.

I have been using Webex for approximately five years.

We encountered connectivity issues that could have stemmed from our network, the internet service provider (ISP), or other factors. It seemed to be an isolated incident, and I didn't have the opportunity to connect with tech support to diagnose the exact problem. It could have been related to an update or an issue with Webex itself. However, the problem was eventually resolved. While it was a significant concern for someone else, I had not personally received any complaints about it prior to that occurrence.

We have three people in my group that have used Webex.

Although there is internal technical support available, I didn't escalate the issue as it was resolved almost immediately. The presence of an active internal technical support team played a key role in swiftly fixing the problem.

I have a preference for alternative tools. Regarding conferences, Webex is acceptable. I want to be honest with you about this. Connecting on Webex is actually easy. I would consider it to be on par with Zoom in terms of overall quality. However, I'm aware that some external users from the company's perspective have encountered certain issues that have hindered their conversations. Honestly, they weren't particularly enthusiastic about this solution. When I need to communicate with these external customers through Webex, they tend to choose another tool. This doesn't inspire much confidence in me, but I understand it's a personal matter. Perhaps the design could be improved, but that's also just my personal opinion. Apart from that, I believe Webex has all the necessary features. As a regular Zoom user, I simply prefer to stick with Zoom based on my own experiences and preferences. Additionally, I find it more useful to use Zoom for both personal and team purposes.

For my ideal solution, I would suggest taking the best features from various tools. For instance, I would incorporate Slack's messaging capabilities and Zoom's audio-video functionality. That combination would be perfect for me. If it were possible to also include elements from other platforms like Telegram and Webex, it would further enhance the overall solution.

The solution requires maintenance. 

I rate Webex a seven out of ten.