Webex Reviews

We use the product for attending training webinars, meetings, and team collaboration.

The product's most valuable flexibility of features is particularly in terms of the user experience, from joining meetings to the controls available during the meetings. We can easily manage the audio-visual aspects as well.

There could be a feature available to record the meetings.

I have been using Webex for half a year. At present, I use the latest version.

I rate the platform's stability a ten out of ten.

The number of times we use the platform depends on a particular virtual event. It varies from every day to once in a week or month. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

We use different webinar platforms, including Webex, Teams, and GoToWebinar, depending on the organization's needs.

Compared to Teams, I rate Webex's initial setup process a ten.

Webex has enhanced the remote team collaboration process regarding time management and cost savings. The whole platform works well in terms of productivity. Its integration with other tools has improved workflow efficiency.

It is an easy-to-use tool with lots of reliability. It should be considered by every potential user looking for a meeting platform.

I rate it a nine out of ten.

I like Webex because it is easy to work with.

In terms of improvement, every time I want to join a meeting on the web, I have to download an extension or the desktop app. It would be better if I could just join meetings directly on the web without extra downloads and steps. Simplifying this process would make things more straightforward and convenient for users like me.

I have been working with Webex for almost four years.

I would rate the scalability as a ten out of ten. It is most suitable for small to medium businesses.

I have used Microsoft Teams along with other solutions like Webex, and in comparison, Teams stands out for its seamless integration with Office 365. The compatibility with business needs makes Teams a preferred choice. While both Teams and Webex serve their purposes, the ease of use and integration with Microsoft's suite of tools make Teams a more convenient option for me.

The initial setup was not overly difficult, but it was time-consuming.

For those considering using Webex, my advice would be to explore automation options, especially if there is an outside team involved. Automating certain tasks can streamline processes and make using Webex more efficient. Overall, I would rate Webex as an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for virtual meetings including video conferences. I'm an IT programmer. 

The stability of the solution is the most important thing. I've used Teams previously and we had a lot of issues with stability. 

I'd like to see a modernized user interface, something a bit more colorful. In that sense, a solution like Teams is much better, it has a modern UI.  

I've been using this solution for two years. 

It's quite scalable, we've had large numbers on WebEx conferences.

We previously used MyMeeting which is more of a boardroom hosted environment where you can connect boardroom Polycom devices to a virtual cloud meeting room. 

I recommend this product and rate it eight out of 10. 

I use Webex for virtual meetings.

Webex could improve the performance.

I have been using Webex for approximately one year.

Webex could be more stable.

We have approximately 1,000 users using this solution in my organization.

We have not contacted technical support.

I have used Skype for Business previously.

The implmentation of Webex is simple. It does not a lot of time.

We no longer use Webex because we found Microsoft Teams to be more stable.

I rate Webex a six out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for virtual meetings. 

You can use the solution for free.

It's a great solution if you need to connect for a virtual meeting. 

The product is very easy to use. It's user-friendly. The overall simplicity of the solution is great.

Its audio is pretty good.

The solution scales well.

In terms of stability, the solution is reliable. 

The initial setup is very straightforward and the deployment is fast.

The video requirement is kind of high. It requires a more stable network. There should be something done to compress the video - to compress the video size, not the quality while still maintaining good quality. Everything just needs to be shrunk down without sacrificing quality so that not so much bandwidth is needed in order to hold meetings effectively.

The solution is very stable. It's reliable. the performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution can scale well. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.

We have about 30 people that use the solution. 

We do plans to increase the usage in the future. As we increase the number of staff, we will increase the number of licenses we buy.

We haven't had any issues with technical support. We are satisfied with them overall. 

We use Zoom and Microsoft Teams alongside Cisco Webex.

Mostly, we use Microsoft Teams, which we actually pay a licensing fee for. We tend to use WebEx if a meeting was set up under it and in those cases, we can use it for free. 

We have found the initial setup to be very simple, very straightforward. The deployment is quick and only takes about 15 minutes or so. It's an easy process. It's not difficult. 

You only need one person to handle deployment or maintenance tasks. 

I'm able to handle the setup myself. I did not need any outside help from any integrators or consultants. 

We didn't pay for this license. We just use it to connect to specific meetings. It's just a free version that we leverage.

It's a good product I'd rate it to others. 

I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. 

I am a reseller and use Webex to host calls with my clients and other associates within my enterprise.

I enjoy being able to make video calls.

I would like the next release to be more user-friendly. 

I have been using Webex for about six years.

The solution is stable.

I do not consider Webex to be too scalable.

The initial setup was easy but it was difficult to integrate it within my environment.

I had a hard time integrating this solution within my environment. I prefer Microsoft Teams over Webex.

We use Webex for virtual meetings.

We are using Microsoft Teams for the whole organization, e.g. everybody uses Teams, but we have a Webex license because we are running a Cisco Telephony solution.

We decided to integrate Cisco telephony with Webex, particularly for our meetings in the boardroom, so we bought Webex licenses so that if we wanted to connect from our boardroom, we can use Webex.

What we like about Webex is that it's easy to use, and it's easy to set meetings and connect to meetings on this solution.

This platform has a lot of performance problems and challenges, particularly with the connection. Connecting is as easy as clicking on a link, but if you connect with so many people, Webex doesn't perform well. It doesn't run smoothly. It requires stable internet connection.

I've been using Webex since the beginning of the COVID pandemic, so almost two years now.

Webex is not as stable, especially when compared to Microsoft Teams. Webex can have a lot of glitches, and does not run as smoothly as Teams.

Webex is a scalable solution.

The installation of Webex was straightforward. It's a web-based solution, so you just have to log in to the Webex site, then you connect. You can do the installation yourself, without the need for a technical team.

I installed the tool myself. There was no need for a technical team.

I'm on a yearly subscription of Webex.

We evaluated Microsoft Teams.

Webex is on a cloud deployment model.

We don't have many users of this tool in our company. We have less than 10 users of it, and we don't intend to increase the number of users, because we are using Microsoft Teams more. We only use Webex when we want to integrate with our Cisco telephone solution from the boardroom.

I was able to log a case with a Cisco tech before, and he was responsive, e.g. within 24 hours for my Cisco devices, but not necessarily for Webex.

I'm giving Webex a score of seven out of ten.

Webex is used mainly for virtual meetings.

The most valuable features of Webex are the depth of the tone and the quality of the picture. I find them better than Teams or Zoom.

Webex could improve the sharing features.

Everybody these days uses virtual meeting solutions because we're all remote working. It would be a benefit if there were permanent collaboration spaces for projects. For example, the way Teams has its teams folders and shared locations.  Webex is missing that feature, or maybe it has it and I'm not aware of it. However, it needs a permanent sharing location for when projects can get stored and can be a collaboration space as opposed to only a meeting space.

I have been using Webex since it was released, approximately 20 years ago.

The stability of Webex is good. I have a very good home bandwidth, the stability isn't an issue.

The biggest Webexsession I have ever done was with approximately 120 people, but typically the sessions are between 15 and 20 people.

I have used other similar solutions, such as Teams and Zoom.

I did not do the implementation of Webex. However, it took one or two minutes to be installed.

I rate Webex an eight out of ten.